FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Products Liability Attorney in Arthur

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

With an unwavering commitment to champion your cause, Carlson Bier is the ideal choice for all facets of Products Liability law in Illinois. Whether you’re dealing with defective medical devices, faulty auto parts, or unsafe consumer products – we have vast experience navigating these challenging legal landscapes. We’ve built our reputation on the bedrock of trust and expertise; evident through a stellar track record of securing favourable outcomes for our clients faced with daunting battles against negligent manufacturers or suppliers. Our firm’s mainstay rule? put YOU first by cultivating open communication channels throughout every step of your case process – offering thorough guidance to make sense out of complex legal jargon into plain English that you can easily grasp and act upon accordingly. Equipped with a team embodying vast industry knowledge derived from years representing countless victims across Illinois State, Carlson Bier exemplifies leading competence within Product Liability legislation parameters. In choosing us as your trusted ally – you opt for absolute dedication towards realizing justice owed to you.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Products Liability Lawyers in Arthur Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our expertise as personal injury attorneys extends to the intricate field of products liability in Illinois. We’re committed to upholding your rights and seeking justice when defective or dangerous products cause you harm. Products we interact with daily, be it a car seat, kitchen appliance or medical device, are expected to be safe for use. However, if these do not meet standard safety requirements leading to an accident or injuries, you may have a products liability claim.

We deal extensively with three types of claims under this category: manufacturing defects, design defects and inadequate warnings. Manufacturing defect claims revolve around errors made during the assembly process which render a product unsafe; while design flaws consider cases where the product’s layout itself is inherently dangerous regardless of accurate manufacture. Thirdly, lack of adequate directions or failure to disclose potential risks can also lead to severe accidental consequences.

Understanding State laws is paramount when navigating any legal issue. In Illinois specifically, statute 735 ILCS 5/2-621 requires us to prove that the product was indeed defective and that it directly caused your injury. Manufacturer negligence need not be proven explicitly due its strict liability principle – holding manufacturers liable simply because their product caused harm even without fault on part state law supports each type associated with defects using “Strict Liability” theory vis-a-vis manufacturers responsibility towards consumers irrespective whether there exist elements such systems error

Painstaking attention is required when building an effective case strategy for products liability claims as evidence surrounding defective merchandise could be multifaceted involving wide scope inquiries spanning design history impact analysis user interaction etc our team brings vast experience board complemented aptitude yield best possible outcomes clients always maintaining adherence ethical mandate

Further understanding differences between federal and state laws aid decision-making process significantly For instance Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) governs most household items but FDA regulations prevail over food drug-related concerns Our nuanced insight into respective jurisdictions results comprehensive approaches tailored each client’s unique circumstances needs

• Identification of product-type (design versus manufacturing defect or presentation of inadequate warning)

• Evidence collection and evaluation, including medical records, photographs and expert testimonies.

• Understanding the state-specific statute of limitations – in Illinois you generally have two years from date of injury to file case.

• Evaluation of your total economic losses such as lost wages, medical expenses and non-economic damages like pain and suffering.

Carlson Bier is prepared to offer relentless advocacy tempered with compassionate understanding during a time when you need it most. We endeavor to demystify the complex legal landscape inherent to products liability claims while ensuring we hold those accountable who failed in their duty to deliver safe products to consumers. Transparency underpins our approach. No fees are charged until we can successfully secure compensation on your behalf.

We urge you not to negotiate or accept any insurance settlements related to defective product injuries independently without consulting an attorney first because these offers might fall significantly short compared actual damages caused potential future complications only noticeable after considerable passage time preventing retrospective financial recovery possible long-term effects sustained injuries

Knowing your rights and having experienced advocates by your side increases the likelihood that fair reparations will be meted out for your suffering. Don’t allow yourself becoming bogged down within daunting labyrinth complexity associated legal proceedings alone Let impediment deter accessing rightfully due justice Put faith hands proven experts guide through every step way remember path righteousness pursued patience perseverance There’s no shortcut victory when came embody essential qualities necessary victoriously navigate oathtaking process earnestly standing alongside commitment ceaseless dedication attainment sound justice Disputes concerning quality safety commercially available industrial goods concern us capability provide unparalled support client crucial juncture testament unwavering resolve steadfastness principle Professioanlism integrity hallmarks credibility recognised patrons throughout region lasting connections forged basis mutual respect trustworthiness Our firm Carlson Bier sets its goal towards safeguarding best interest diligently ripping apart defence opposing party absolute precision articulation fact evidence

Relinquishing control of your products liability claim to our competent legal team is the first important step towards fighting for your rights. Gain peace of mind by allowing our skilled attorneys, backed by years of success in handling personal injury cases, to manage your case expertly from discovery, through trial and towards a satisfactory settlement or verdict. Avail our knowledge and wealth of experience today by clicking on the button below. By doing so, get the valuable opportunity to find out how much compensation your products liability claim could potentially warrant.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Arthur Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Product Liability FAQ​

Product liability is the legal responsibility of manufacturers, distributors, sellers, and suppliers for injuries caused by defective products.

The three main types of product liability claims are:

  • Manufacturing defects: These defects occur during the manufacturing process and cause the product to be unsafe.
  • Design defects: These defects exist in the design of the product and make it inherently unsafe.
  • Marketing defects: These defects occur when the manufacturer or seller fails to adequately warn consumers about the dangers of the product.

The signs and symptoms of a product liability injury can vary depending on the type of product that caused the injury. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Physical injuries: These could include cuts, bruises, burns, fractures, and other injuries.
  • Property damage: This could include damage to your home, car, or other belongings.
  • Economic losses: These could include lost wages, medical expenses, and other financial losses.

The treatment options for product liability injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to repair injuries that were caused by a defective product.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of product liability injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for a product liability injury if you have been injured due to a defective product. A product liability lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Arthur

Areas of Practice in Arthur

Bicycle Incidents

Focused on legal support for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others' recklessness or dangerous conditions.

Thermal Wounds

Giving expert legal support for patients of grave burn injuries caused by events or indifference.

Physician Misconduct

Delivering expert legal services for clients affected by physician malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Items Accountability

Handling cases involving dangerous products, delivering specialist legal assistance to victims affected by harmful products.

Elder Misconduct

Advocating for the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to misconduct in elderly care environments, ensuring compensation.

Slip & Trip Occurrences

Specialist in handling trip accident cases, providing legal representation to individuals seeking redress for their suffering.

Newborn Traumas

Providing legal guidance for relatives affected by medical carelessness resulting in neonatal injuries.

Automobile Crashes

Crashes: Focused on assisting individuals of car accidents get equitable settlement for hurts and damages.

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Dedicated to providing legal support for bikers involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring just recovery for losses.

18-Wheeler Crash

Delivering experienced legal representation for clients involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing rightful settlement for harms.

Construction Incidents

Focused on representing employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or carelessness.

Neurological Damages

Committed to ensuring expert legal representation for individuals suffering from brain injuries due to negligence.

Dog Attack Damages

Proficient in handling cases for individuals who have suffered harms from dog bites or animal attacks.

Foot-traveler Accidents

Expert in legal services for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering claims.

Wrongful Loss

Advocating for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, providing sensitive and adept legal support to ensure justice.

Spine Injury

Focused on supporting persons with paralysis, offering professional legal services to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440