...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Barrington

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’ve had the misfortune of experiencing a dog bite injury in the Barrington area, Carlson Bier offers outstanding legal representation. Our proficient team specializes in personal injury lawsuits to ensure victims receive deserved compensation for dog-related injuries. Recognized for our comprehensive understanding and expertise handling these cases, we are known throughout the state of Illinois as reliable attorneys that instill confidence during this challenging time. We respect every client’s unique circumstances; compassionately guiding them through their legal journey while fiercely advocating on their behalf. Our strategy includes scientifically proving liability based on an animal’s behavioral pattern and characteristics, ensuring all medical bills are taken care of accordingly if bitten unjustifiably by someone else’s pet—providing not just reparation but peace-of-mind following such traumatic experiences without compromising your location privacy. Choose Carlson Bier for skillful resolution to your predicament caused by canine aggression incidents close to you with complete professionalism and utmost diligence.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Barrington Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in Personal Injury Law with an emphasis on Dog Bite Injuries. When you or a loved one fall victim to such incidents, understanding your rights is consequential. Being based in Illinois, we’re proficient about the state’s applicable laws and statutes for dog bite injuries. Our expertise enables us to effectively represent clients who have suffered both physical and emotional trauma as a result of dog attacks.

Now let’s delve into the specifics of Dog Bite Injuries. Under Illinois law, the owner is strictly liable if their pet harms another individual without provocation. This liability remains even if there was no previous indication that their dog was dangerous or likely to cause injury. The damages included in such cases revolve around medical expenses, lost wages due to inability to work, pain and suffering including psychological distress which can be considerable especially among children victims. There might also be compensation available for disfigurement or permanent disability resulting from the attack.

• Dog owners are strictly liable for their pets’ actions.

• Victims can claim medical costs, lost income, pain/suffering as well as possible damages for disfigurement or lasting impairment.

The legal process tends to appear complex and daunting which is why it’s key to engage competent legal counsel as soon after an incident as possible. Timeliness serves dual purposes: Firstly gathering evidence while it’s fresh like witness testimonies or photographs; Secondly adhering to statute limitations also known as deadline within which you should sue in order not to forfeit your right before court.

The journey towards fair settlement entails several steps:

1) Consultation and case evaluation: We’ll establish whether you have a viable lawsuit together with expectations moving forward.

2) Building your case: involves collecting comprehensive evidence acknowledging real harm inflicted upon you due not just merely physical wounds but impact on general life quality.

3) Negotiation with at-fault party: attempting settlement prior reaching courtroom situation however if this isn’t successful, we’ll diligently prepare for trial.

4) Litigation: presenting your case before a judge or jury.

Bear in mind that each step is equally crucial to optimize successful outcome.

• Timely seek legal assistance following an incident.

• Legal procedure entails consultation & case appraisal, case setup, negotiation and litigation.

At Carlson Bier, we pride ourselves on our extensive understanding of the complexities involved in dog bite injury cases. Our compassionate and dedicated approach ensures clients feel supported throughout this often-stressful process. We’re here to navigate this daunting journey with you bearing guide role towards best possible result based on facts surrounding your specific situation.

Ultimately one may ask ‘what’s my claim worth?’ Understandably assessing how much compensation you’re entitled to can be challenging given that various aspects factor into such valuations. While no lawyer should promise exact figures upfront due factors unpredictability, generally considerable compensations have been attained especially severe circumstances involving torment/pain or grave physical impairment.

Every person’s scenario differs thus it’s pivotal tasking competent professionals able distilling these nuances hence providing most accurate evaluation possible.

Hence why not click the button below allowing us assess potential damages applicable to your distinct case? By offering valuable and comprehensive oversight into Illinois’ dog bite laws, summons preparation through to representation at court hearings alongside personal dedication each client well-being beyond mere monetary settlement – At Carlson Bier your welfare is more than just a priority; It’s our commitment!

Remember that compassion doesn’t compromise fierce representation – as we strive helping you attain justice deserved while endeavoring debunk myth associated with stressful/legal proceedings. As advocates for injured victims seeking fair compensation within Illinois jurisdiction, our legacy thrives predominantly from understanding unique processes attributed dog-bite injuries reflecting onto tailored efficient strategies employed hence maximizing restitution success odds granted individual variances exuding every matter undertaken.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Barrington Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Barrington

Areas of Practice in Barrington

Cycling Crashes

Proficient in legal representation for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others's carelessness or unsafe conditions.

Fire Damages

Giving adept legal support for patients of serious burn injuries caused by mishaps or recklessness.

Physician Incompetence

Providing specialist legal assistance for victims affected by medical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Items Liability

Dealing with cases involving faulty products, offering adept legal guidance to consumers affected by harmful products.

Nursing Home Misconduct

Supporting the rights of elders who have been subjected to misconduct in nursing homes environments, ensuring restitution.

Tumble and Stumble Incidents

Adept in addressing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal advice to sufferers seeking compensation for their harm.

Newborn Traumas

Delivering legal guidance for kin affected by medical carelessness resulting in infant injuries.

Vehicle Crashes

Mishaps: Focused on helping victims of car accidents secure fair remuneration for damages and losses.

Scooter Crashes

Expert in providing legal assistance for victims involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring justice for damages.

Semi Collision

Delivering adept legal support for individuals involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing just compensation for injuries.

Worksite Accidents

Committed to supporting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or recklessness.

Cerebral Impairments

Specializing in providing professional legal support for patients suffering from cerebral injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Bite Harms

Specialized in dealing with cases for people who have suffered wounds from dog attacks or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Incidents

Specializing in legal support for joggers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering recovery.

Wrongful Loss

Striving for relatives affected by a wrongful death, supplying empathetic and experienced legal representation to ensure fairness.

Vertebral Trauma

Committed to representing victims with backbone trauma, offering compassionate legal representation to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer