Construction Site Accident Attorney in Beach Park

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Navigating the aftermath of a construction site accident can be distressing and overwhelming. When unfortunate incidents occur, having an experienced personal injury attorney to trust is paramount; that’s what Carlson Bier provides. Specializing in Construction Site Accident cases, our well-versed team assists clients in Beach Park with unmatched professionalism and dedication. Aware of intricate legalities connected to construction accidents, we deploy strategic procedures while advocating for your rightful compensation. Our firm stands apart from others through decades-long commitment towards client-oriented service balanced alongside robust know-how about industry-specific injuries and safety regulations. We embody unwavering dedication while pursuing justice against negligent parties, ensuring you get the optimum damage recovery you deserve. To simplify matters further during distressful times, we extend services to home or hospital visits because at Carlson Bier: You matter more than anything else! Remember – recovery becomes attainable when equipped with expert legal assistance solidly anchored on proven results and empathetic handling of personal injury claims surrounding accidents at construction sites.

About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in Beach Park Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are committed to serving as a powerful legal ally for those who have sustained injuries in construction site accidents across the state of Illinois. Our team of personal injury lawyers brings with them an unmatched understanding and expertise gained over years spent navigating the complex landscape of construction accident law. The bustling construction industry is unquestionably responsible for much economic growth, but unfortunately, it’s also a setting rife with potential hazards that can result in serious injuries or even fatalities.

In light of this reality, our mission at Carlson Bier is to provide comprehensive legal representation to clients hurt as a result of negligent working conditions or risky procedures on construction sites. Owing to their complexity, such cases demand extensive knowledge and sharp litigation skills – assets we both possess and continue refining day-in-day-out.

It’s essential to understand some key variables involved in construction site accidents:

– Hazardous materials: Exposure to hazardous substances like asbestos or lead poses severe health threats.

– Falls from heights: These could be falls from ladders, scaffolding, roofs etc., which often result in severe injuries.

– Equipment malfunction: Accidents involving faulty machinery or equipment including cranes and power tools may cause devastating harm.

– Struck by an object: Falling objects, flying debris or moving vehicles on-site potentially cause injuries at any point due to erratic movement across chaotic sites.

We invite you not just to rely on these summaries but rather delve deeper into each category listed above. Comprehensive knowledge about potential risks contributes towards prevention purposes too, alongside bearing its worth during possible claim scenarios after unfortunate incidents take place.

Across all cases we handle at Carlson Bier, our commitment remains unswerving; diligently pursuing maximum compensation for damages ranging from physical injuries and mental trauma through loss wages given inevitable work disruptions suffered due to the incident – reaching right up unto wrongful death benefits if relevant circumstances arise.

Having faithfully served numerous clients embroiled within similar circumstances previously, our law firm fully appreciates the devastating fallout that an injury can potentially trigger given its far-reaching effects on an individual’s life and livelihood. We also recognize how absolutely vital reliable legal representation may prove during such testing times as one grapples to cope with ever-mounting medical bills amid other pressing concerns.

Choosing Carlson Bier sends across a dual message: It informs the erring parties you mean business, and it simultaneously relays our acceptance in doggedly fighting for your rightful claims or defenses within this challenging legal domain — irrespective of case complexity or adversarial clout brought upon by rival firms.

Take a moment to remember this essential aspect – time is precious following construction site accidents. Illinois law stipulates strict deadlines (known as “Statute of Limitations”) within which lawsuits must be filed post-incident – another stark reminder acting hastily could make a world of difference to your claim’s ultimate outcome.

At Carlson Bier, we reinforce our pledge to diligently working towards securing maximum compensation for any hardships faced, by offering free first consultations. This obligation-free interaction allows us to understand better your unique circumstance facilitating personalized advice while forming an initial assessment regarding potential damages’ recoverability aspects you might seek.

Remember, every case holds immense value at Carlson Bier – sectors we regularly cover include not just employee-related injury cases emerging from negligent practices or faulty equipment usage but also legally represent bystanders unintentionally caught amidst deadly crossfires unfolding across frantic construction zones quite predominantly these days.

We know increasing knowledge alongside making informed decisions makes all the difference when dealing with aftermaths following catastrophic events such as construction site accidents. We invite you to draw from our deep wellspring of expertise, further clarified above. Armed with this understanding, take the next decisive step: Click on the button below and let us help ascertain what your unique situation translates into in terms of possible monetary recovery on offer—your pursuit for justice begins here at Carlson Bier; Let’s journey together.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Beach Park Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Beach Park

Areas of Practice in Beach Park

Bicycle Incidents

Focused on legal representation for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' carelessness or perilous conditions.

Burn Wounds

Supplying expert legal support for victims of serious burn injuries caused by events or carelessness.

Physician Incompetence

Providing specialist legal services for patients affected by medical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Products Fault

Managing cases involving dangerous products, offering professional legal guidance to customers affected by product malfunctions.

Nursing Home Neglect

Defending the rights of seniors who have been subjected to misconduct in elderly care environments, ensuring fairness.

Stumble and Stumble Occurrences

Specialist in managing stumble accident cases, providing legal advice to sufferers seeking recovery for their losses.

Childbirth Damages

Offering legal assistance for loved ones affected by medical malpractice resulting in infant injuries.

Vehicle Collisions

Crashes: Committed to guiding victims of car accidents obtain reasonable compensation for hurts and losses.

Motorcycle Collisions

Committed to providing legal assistance for bikers involved in bike accidents, ensuring justice for harm.

Big Rig Incident

Ensuring expert legal representation for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing appropriate settlement for injuries.

Construction Site Collisions

Concentrated on assisting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or recklessness.

Brain Harms

Expert in extending professional legal assistance for clients suffering from cerebral injuries due to accidents.

K9 Assault Harms

Proficient in managing cases for persons who have suffered traumas from K9 assaults or wildlife encounters.

Foot-traveler Crashes

Committed to legal assistance for walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering compensation.

Unjust Loss

Fighting for families affected by a wrongful death, providing sensitive and experienced legal assistance to ensure restitution.

Spine Injury

Committed to supporting persons with vertebral damage, offering professional legal support to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer