...

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Chadwick

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When facing spinal cord injury litigation, securing the best possible legal support is invaluable. This introduces Carlson Bier; a proficient personal injury law firm with solid experience and deep-rooted dedication to Spinal Cord Injuries cases in Illinois state. It’s crucial to mention that our prowess extends beyond geographical boundaries, to clients from various places including Chadwick, who value our tenacious representation and guidance.

Our attorneys demonstrate predominant aptitude handling nuanced medical information, arguing probabilities of negligence while demanding maximum compensation for your injuries. Subsequently, we stand as an exemplary choice servicing Chadwick residents dealing with the aftermath of such traumatic experiences.

Carlson Bier’s commitment embodies relentless advocacy for victims’ rights coupled with astute understanding of complex Spinal Cord Injuries claims – enhancing opportunities for favorable outcomes. We proffer comprehensive legal procedures ensuring client capacity restoration due financial stability achieved through aggressive negotiation or trial resolutions.

Undoubtedly in selective process pursuit? Trust Carlson Bier! Our reliable counsel harmonizes strategic direction and compassionate advice throughout settlements processes – all attuned toward heralding justice on behalf of you – our esteemed client within Chadwick. Champion your cause today by enlisting unmatched expertise provided by no other than Carlson Bier Attorneys at Law.

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Chadwick Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we provide unmatched representation to individuals who have suffered Spinal Cord Injuries (SCIs) resulting from accidents or negligence. Backed by an extensive track record of successful personal injury claims across Illinois, our experienced attorneys draw on their deep understanding of the complexities surrounding SCIs to fight for justice and fair compensation.

The human spinal cord is a delicate structure responsible for transmitting messages between the brain and various body parts, enabling functions such as movement, sensation, and control of certain physiological processes. When a traumatic event disrupts this process by damaging the spinal cord, the consequences are usually dire – resulting in partial or complete loss of motor or sensory ability below the level of injury.

Key facts about SCIs include:

– The majority occur due to accidents like falls, car crashes, sports injuries or violent incidents.

– They frequently result in partial (paraplegia) or complete paralysis (quadriplegia).

– Early symptoms can range from pain and muscle weakness to more serious issues like difficulty breathing.

– Treatment encompasses emergency care followed by ongoing medical intervention which can be costly & time-consuming.

Those living with SCIs not only face physical hardships but also mental anguish. From adjustments in their lifestyle and relationships to dealing with lost earning potential – every aspect is affected. Because these injuries typically involve intense medical requirements including physicians’ services, hospital stays, physical therapy sessions and adaptive equipment needs; expenses associated with them often reach staggering numbers.

At Carlson Bier, we comprehend how life-altering a spinal cord injury is for victims as well as their families. We believe that those who experience these circumstances due to someone else’s negligence ought not bear these costs alone. Thusly strengthening our commitment towards securing just retribution on your behalf.

Our dedicated team meticulously investigates every accident detail right from how it unfolded to determining liability before formulating a strategic legal approach tailored uniquely around each situation’s specifics. To us – no case is identical and we bring our wealth of expertise as well as resources in every pursuit for justice. Our objective is to ensure that you receive adequate means to secure the care, comfort and dignity you ought to live with post-SCI.

The compensation pursued may cover:

– Medical expenses – both present and anticipated.

– Loss of future earnings due to inability to work or lost career opportunities.

– Pain, suffering and emotional distress experienced by the victim.

– Rehabilitation costs including therapies & assistive technology needs.

Being a victim of SCI can undeniably turn your world upside down. Yet, amidst all uncertainties – one thing remains firm – Carlson Bier’s unwavering commitment towards advocating on behalf of affected individuals while fiercely fighting against negligent parties involved.

While no price tag may entirely restore what was lost due to an SCI-related incident, justice yields consolation through monetary reprieve that allows you and your loved ones peace-of-mind during rehabilitation as well as restoration efforts. Even though navigating personal injury law might seem daunting initially; it doesn’t have to be when our proficient attorneys are here guiding you every step of the way.

As professionals in-personal injury litigation centered around spinal cord injuries across Illinois, we remain steadfastly dedicated in our mission towards fairness, advocacy and securing deserved financial relief for victims encumbered under burdensome medical bills along with disrupted livelihoods caused by these injurious events.

Do bear this crucial fact in mind – Illinois state law limits the time span within which you can file a personal injury lawsuit after an accident. Hence acting promptly will provide BJ Carlson’s skilled contingent ample opportunity for thorough research thus solidifying your claim substantially.

So why wait? Let us evaluate how much your case could potentially be worth today. For comprehensive insights into damages potentially applicable onto your situation along with further assistance regarding legal provisions intertwined amid SCIs – click on the button below now!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Chadwick Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Chadwick

Areas of Practice in Chadwick

Pedal Cycle Accidents

Focused on legal advocacy for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others' indifference or unsafe conditions.

Thermal Traumas

Providing adept legal services for people of grave burn injuries caused by occurrences or carelessness.

Healthcare Incompetence

Ensuring experienced legal support for persons affected by physician malpractice, including surgical errors.

Commodities Fault

Taking on cases involving problematic products, supplying specialist legal support to clients affected by harmful products.

Elder Abuse

Advocating for the rights of seniors who have been subjected to mistreatment in senior centers environments, ensuring protection.

Slip & Slip Incidents

Professional in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to sufferers seeking redress for their harm.

Birth Damages

Offering legal aid for households affected by medical misconduct resulting in childbirth injuries.

Auto Crashes

Mishaps: Devoted to guiding victims of car accidents gain appropriate remuneration for wounds and losses.

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Focused on providing legal assistance for bikers involved in bike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for damages.

Trucking Mishap

Ensuring professional legal services for victims involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing fair claims for losses.

Construction Site Accidents

Concentrated on representing workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Neurological Harms

Expert in offering expert legal advice for clients suffering from neurological injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Harms

Specialized in dealing with cases for clients who have suffered wounds from dog attacks or animal assaults.

Pedestrian Collisions

Committed to legal representation for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering damages.

Wrongful Demise

Standing up for relatives affected by a wrongful death, extending caring and expert legal guidance to ensure compensation.

Spinal Cord Damage

Focused on assisting persons with paralysis, offering professional legal services to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer