Construction Site Accident Attorney in Crossville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In Crossville and beyond, Carlson Bier maintains its superior standard as a dedicated Construction Site Accident attorney group. Unforeseen on-site hazards can lead to significant injuries that seriously impact lives. When you or a loved one face such circumstances, our expert law team vigilantly represents your rights for optimal results. Boasting extensive experience with intricate Illinois construction site accident cases, Carlson Bier’s record of securing favorable settlements and verdicts is second to none. Our attorneys’ comprehensive understanding of the complexity surrounding these types of incidents ensures every detail is meticulously evaluated for case strength development; because we believe every client deserves precise attention to their unique situation coupled with tenacious representation. Wherever in Illinois your home may be; when you need an exceptional legal ally in navigating the aftermath of a Construction Site Accident – look no further than Carlson Bier’s proven competence and unwavering commitment to championing justice for personal injury victims across the state.

About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in Crossville Illinois

Construction site accidents are unfortunate events that can lead to severe injuries, financial struggles, and extended recovery periods. At Carlson Bier, we specialize in handling these complex cases involving construction site accidents throughout Illinois and will strive to help you navigate through the legal process with ease.

One of the preliminary steps includes an understanding of how such incidents occur. Negligence is often at the heart of these unfortunate incidents. Some common causes include safety violations, equipment malfunctions, failure to provide appropriate protective gear or improper training. Understanding these factors strengthens your case as it enables you to identify where fault lies.

The aftermath of a construction site accident varies from minor injuries to life-altering damages like loss of limbs, spinal injury, and traumatic brain injury. These result not just in physical hardship but also trigger financial instability due to medical bills and lost wages from inability to work. Our team at Carlson Bier helps victims secure rightful compensation that can cushion against these blows.

Just as each accident is unique so is every claim; hence knowing what can be recovered legally ensures you get full justice. The monetary relief commonly attributable includes:

• Medical expenses – covering hospital stays, surgeries, therapies or medications

• Lost income including future earning potentials

• Pain and suffering – which embodies emotional stress

• Caretaker services if disability results

Our skilled attorneys will guide you on aspects relevant for your suit in line with changes enacted by Illinois law.

However, proving negligence isn’t always straightforward even when evident – complex jargon-filled documentation often shields truth; here our firm steps up fashioning compelling arguments while closely following state laws governing construction sites.

A pivotal point not worthy of neglect is the statute of limitations outlined under Illinois statutes which places time restrictions within which your lawsuit must commence post-accident; otherwise rights stand forfeited enhancing why speedy legal advice becomes essential upon facing such calamity.

At our law office, we value transparency greatly and acknowledging possible roadblocks signifies it. A fair chance remains that the negligent party may dispute their responsibility or Insurance companies deny rightful claims leading to court battles. Nevertheless, rest assured our team prides itself on its courtroom prowess, warranting a vigorous stand for your rights every step of the way.

The key to prevailing in this stressful circumstance is an alliance with experienced professionals adept at traversing personal injury law; therefore, entrust us at Carlson Bier where each case is viewed through a personalized lens ensuring comprehensive solutions prioritizing client’s interests above all else.

To cap things off, pursuing legal action post any personal injury especially from construction site accidents can be daunting and convoluted – marking beginning paths clear ensures prospective ease sailing. So let Carlson Bier lead the way standing up against wrongdoing allowing respite focus on recovery while we handle the rest.

While reading about it helps navigate initial rough waters progressively better, giving shape to these planforms calls for expert involvement which our group promises. Also equip yourself further learning Illinois legislative provisions directed towards such suits by accessing resource availability via clicking below.

Indeed hope lies in unity and Carlson Bier believes unifying knowledge with expertise elicits favourable outcomes materializing rightful duties satisfactorily. Be it medical filing guidance or settlement negotiations till combating courageously if heading trial ensues; we pledge unwavering support.

You’ve endured ample pain already; allow the dedicated attorney brigade at Carlson Bier provide solace fostering justice restoring peace of mind regained control over disrupted normalcy.

Receiving legal enlightenment is your first constructive stride leading admirable fightbacks hence make use of this opportunity exploring how much your dropping anchor here measures worth in terms of potential claim allowance – click on ‘Case Value’ button now enhancing pivotal moves promptly well within statutory periods ensuring not losing out on rightfully earned compensations awaiting collection.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Crossville Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Crossville

Areas of Practice in Crossville

Pedal Cycle Crashes

Specializing in legal assistance for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' indifference or perilous conditions.

Scald Traumas

Offering expert legal services for victims of serious burn injuries caused by mishaps or negligence.

Healthcare Misconduct

Providing expert legal services for persons affected by physician malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Items Liability

Taking on cases involving defective products, extending skilled legal help to consumers affected by harmful products.

Aged Malpractice

Protecting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to neglect in care facilities environments, ensuring fairness.

Stumble & Fall Incidents

Professional in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal services to individuals seeking justice for their harm.

Infant Harms

Extending legal guidance for relatives affected by medical misconduct resulting in infant injuries.

Auto Incidents

Accidents: Focused on aiding individuals of car accidents receive equitable recompense for damages and destruction.

Bike Incidents

Expert in providing representation for victims involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring fair compensation for traumas.

Trucking Accident

Ensuring specialist legal advice for victims involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing adequate compensation for damages.

Building Site Crashes

Concentrated on defending workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or carelessness.

Brain Harms

Specializing in delivering professional legal services for victims suffering from neurological injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Damages

Proficient in handling cases for people who have suffered traumas from dog attacks or wildlife encounters.

Pedestrian Crashes

Dedicated to legal services for walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering recovery.

Wrongful Death

Standing up for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, delivering caring and expert legal representation to ensure fairness.

Vertebral Damage

Expert in representing individuals with spine impairments, offering expert legal assistance to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer