Construction Site Accident Attorney in Dahlgren

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Navigating the aftermath of a construction site accident is unnerving, even intimidating. Thankfully, Carlson Bier seeks to alleviate that pressure for residents in Dahlgren and beyond. The firm, known for its experience in personal injury cases surrounding Construction Site Accidents provides expert legal support every step of the way truly imbibing with your best interests at heart. From helping interpret complicated laws to directly communicating with insurance companies on your behalf, Carlson Bier handles it all. Meticulous fact-finding combined with attention detail helps ensure optimal litigation conditions bolstered by thorough preparations are key features they prioritize navigating such legalities skillfully which makes them a wise choice when you need representation following an unfortunate event like this one could be potentially ruinous to daily life as usual thus needing professional backing can give you peace of mind while dealing through these adversarial circumstances possibly getting fair compensation for injuries sustained therein making their services crucial where Carlson Bier becomes truly instrumental providing pivotal assistance during these difficult times ensuring better outcomes possible just remember why diversity jurisdiction is so vital don’t hesitate reach out today letting their expertise work hard protecting rights obtaining justice deserved

About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in Dahlgren Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are dedicated to providing exemplary legal assistance and representation for individuals who have unfortunately found themselves victim of accidents occurring on construction sites. As an accomplished personal injury law firm proudly based in the great state of Illinois, our team is devoted to offering diligent and tenacious advocacy for those who face circumstances that often prove both trying and traumatic.

Construction site accidents can encompass a broad range of potential incidents; slip & fall occurrences on improperly maintained surfaces, injuries due to inadequate safety protocols, hazardous material exposure leading to affliction – the list goes on. Despite rigorous industry standards designed for safe working conditions, these unfortunate incidents continue to occur at alarming rates. Remember:

• Construction workers operate within risk-laden environments daily.

• The prolific use of heavy machinery exacerbates potential hazards.

• Ill-performing or misused equipment can cause severe injury.

The aftermath following such incidences often brings forth financial distress upon victims owing not only medical bills but also woes from loss of earning capacity during recovery periods or even long term disability. Legislation does offer paths towards restitution concerning occupational health and security breaches by laying down clear responsibilities on employers’ part regarding worker safety.

Your well-being, both physically and emotionally in these hardship times is paramount – let Carlson Bier fight your corner while you focus on the all-important task of recovery. We strive unyieldingly towards securing adequate compensation for any losses suffered as a result of a construction site accident you’ve endured.

Our personalized approach ensures that each case receives meticulous evaluation complemented with undivided attention from our experienced attorneys. We diligently work towards presenting compelling claims substantiated by robust evidence thereby strengthening your case.

Walking you through what may seem like an unnerving labyrinthine path filled with intricate facets of personal injury law terminology – negligence per se, vicarious liability etc., Carlson Bier keeps you advised every step along the way ensuring transparency throughout this process whilst translating complex terminologies into tangible terms

• A heavy machinery accident resulting from inadequate or lack of instruction could be a case for vicarious liability.

• Negligence per se may be invoked if an injury resulted due to safety standards breaches.

Our reputable Illinois-based firm prides itself on not just being supporters but staunch advocates for those who’ve suffered injury in the course of their work. Yet, we deem our role far more significant than mere representation – subscribing instead as partners pledged towards your journey on the path to justice and rightful restitution.

Today’s society is fraught with ambiguity, particularly when rights become subjected against influential entities. Carlson Bier stands as your worthy ally in your pursuit of fairness and compensation – let us shoulder this burden while you focus on healing.

Now, discover how Carlson Bier can aid you further on this journey toward fair restitution resulting from a construction site accident experience by exploring our comprehensive suite of services tailored specifically for such cases. Unearth what makes us stand out within the realm of personal injury law, learn first-hand about countless previous clients whose lives we have enabled to regain control over through aggressive assertation and realization of their rights. Click the button below to learn how much your case may be worth – allow yourself this opportunity at pursuing what is fair and due after enduring such a harrowing incident on a construction site. Our commitment remains unwavering – advocacy imbued with compassion that serves right where it belongs: firmly with you, always at your side throughout and beyond our professional engagement.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Dahlgren Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Dahlgren

Areas of Practice in Dahlgren

Cycling Collisions

Proficient in legal support for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' indifference or unsafe conditions.

Flame Traumas

Offering expert legal services for sufferers of grave burn injuries caused by mishaps or indifference.

Medical Negligence

Extending professional legal assistance for victims affected by clinical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Items Liability

Addressing cases involving dangerous products, offering specialist legal services to customers affected by harmful products.

Aged Malpractice

Advocating for the rights of elders who have been subjected to mistreatment in aged care environments, ensuring justice.

Slip and Stumble Occurrences

Specialist in addressing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal services to clients seeking recovery for their suffering.

Newborn Traumas

Delivering legal aid for relatives affected by medical malpractice resulting in newborn injuries.

Motor Accidents

Mishaps: Focused on helping individuals of car accidents receive equitable settlement for damages and losses.

Bike Accidents

Focused on providing legal assistance for motorcyclists involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for traumas.

Trucking Accident

Providing professional legal assistance for persons involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recompense for harms.

Building Site Collisions

Concentrated on advocating for staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or negligence.

Head Damages

Expert in offering dedicated legal advice for individuals suffering from head injuries due to incidents.

Dog Attack Traumas

Adept at tackling cases for individuals who have suffered damages from dog attacks or beast attacks.

Pedestrian Accidents

Committed to legal services for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering recovery.

Unwarranted Demise

Fighting for relatives affected by a wrongful death, supplying caring and expert legal support to ensure redress.

Backbone Trauma

Dedicated to advocating for victims with backbone trauma, offering professional legal representation to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer