FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Construction Site Accident Attorney in Douglas

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with a construction site accident in Douglas, it’s critical to ensure proper representation. Trust Carlson Bier, the premier personal injury law firm with extensive experience and knowledge of Illinois’ legal landscape. As industry leaders, we’re acutely aware of the multifaceted challenges inherent to these cases. Having secured countless favorable verdicts on behalf of our valued clients affected by construction-related mishaps; Carlson Bier brings unmatched value.

Our solid track record stands testament to our skillful attorneys who excel at navigating complex factual & legal issues prevalent in such accidents– from work safety negligence, equipment failure disputes to dealing with insurance claims intricacies. We blend aggressive advocacy and compassionate understanding for every client’s unique circumstances thereby maximizing potential settlements or jury awards.

Residing across borders does not limit us owing subsequent credibility which reinforces your case dynamics even if it arises in locales like Douglas.Our strategies are tailored personally while upholding compliance standards that strictly adhere under Illinois law guidelines.

By choosing Carlson Bier as your Construction Site Accident Lawyer Group, you acquire an ally robustly equipped for securing justice that you deserve amidst life-altering adversities post-accident incidents!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in Douglas Illinois

Construction accidents are all too common, and they can have severe consequences for those involved. At Carlson Bier, as experienced personal injury attorneys based in Illinois, we understand the devastating impacts of such unfortunate incidents. We dedicate ourselves to providing legal support that aids victims of construction site accidents not only in navigating through the complexities of legal matters but also securing their rights to fair compensation.

Dealing with a construction accident involves understanding various aspects. First and foremost are the types of accidents that occur on these sites, which mainly include falls from heights, electrocutions, struck by objects, and machinery-related incidents. Each category represents a unique situation requiring keen examination before proceeding legally.

It’s essential to remember that traumatic injuries resulting from construction accidents may result in temporary or permanent disability or worse still death. Examples of such injuries range from fractures and amputations to burns or even spinal cord injuries.

When it comes to handling these cases, several key factors need consideration:

– Identifying liable parties: This may include property owners, contractors or sub-contractors.

– Thoroughly investigating and documenting the accident circumstances:

Gathering evidence at this stage is vital – photographs of the scene; statements from witnesses; details about safety protocols followed (or not) can make or break your case.

– Seeking medical reporting: Attending physician’s testimonials concerning injury severity provides weighing scale during settlement negotiations.

A crucial aspect readers must be aware of is workers’ compensation law – how it operates within Illinois boundary frame and its implications on employee rights post-accident scenario. But there’s more—third-party claims inclusion. If your injury was due in part because someone other than your employer acted negligently (e.g., equipment manufacturer), you could file a claim against them concurrently with pursuing worker’s compensation benefits.

Navigating this maze necessitates expertise—an expertise we at Carlson Bier provide clients dutifully over years offering seamless transition through tough times like these.

We appreciate the juridical system’s complexity, especially when dealing with personal injury cases relating to construction accidents. That’s why Carlson Bier provides every client personalized strategy and robust legal representation in a manner easily comprehensible for them – no complex legal jargons.

We emphasize our clients’ rights, assuring that they receive full compensation—whether it’s covering medical expenses, lost wages, and other costs associated with recovery or compensation for pain and suffering resulted from their accident.

Our devotion is seen not only in unwavering advocacy during the trial but also in compassionate counsel helping victims regain composure post-accident strains.

Remember: Any settlement offer you get from an insurance company following a construction site accident will be negotiated with knowledge of all facts on case-base and skillful negotiations backed by strong evidence compilation ensuring maximum possible benefits reach your end.

Here at Carlson Bier, we understand that getting back on track after a devastating accident can be daunting—physically, emotionally, and financially. Our job as your dedicated personal injury attorneys in Illinois is to lift this burden off your shoulders so you can focus solely on recovery while we take care of all legal aspects leading towards adequate reparations deservedly allotted to you.

Are you ready to find out how much your case is worth? If yes then don’t hold back anymore—we’re here to advise, guide and advocate for your best interests. The truth of just compensation for your pain won’t remain oblivious for long with us handling your concern assiduously. Please click the button below to initiate a discussion about potentially bringing justice within hand’s grasp as we stride confidently into battleground seeking fair retribution for wrong done unto you by negligent party/parties involved causing construction site mishaps affect imperishably on life quality dereference metrics post-incident scenario.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Douglas Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Douglas

Areas of Practice in Douglas

Bike Incidents

Dedicated to legal advocacy for people injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' carelessness or dangerous conditions.

Thermal Traumas

Offering expert legal assistance for victims of intense burn injuries caused by occurrences or carelessness.

Hospital Incompetence

Providing professional legal assistance for clients affected by physician malpractice, including negligent care.

Products Liability

Addressing cases involving defective products, delivering skilled legal help to victims affected by defective items.

Senior Neglect

Advocating for the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to neglect in elderly care environments, ensuring fairness.

Tumble & Slip Incidents

Specialist in addressing trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to victims seeking restitution for their harm.

Birth Wounds

Offering legal support for families affected by medical misconduct resulting in birth injuries.

Motor Collisions

Crashes: Dedicated to aiding clients of car accidents receive equitable payout for wounds and impairment.

Bike Incidents

Dedicated to providing legal support for motorcyclists involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring justice for injuries.

Truck Collision

Delivering adept legal services for drivers involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing appropriate claims for damages.

Worksite Mishaps

Dedicated to advocating for staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or negligence.

Cerebral Traumas

Expert in delivering compassionate legal services for victims suffering from neurological injuries due to misconduct.

Canine Attack Harms

Proficient in addressing cases for individuals who have suffered damages from puppy bites or wildlife encounters.

Cross-walker Collisions

Committed to legal advocacy for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering damages.

Unwarranted Passing

Working for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, supplying empathetic and experienced legal guidance to ensure restitution.

Spinal Cord Trauma

Expert in representing victims with backbone trauma, offering dedicated legal representation to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​