...

Medical Malpractice Attorney in Fairmount

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the event you or a loved one has fallen victim to professional negligence within Fairmount’s healthcare network, trust Carlson Bier, your stalwart defenders against medical malpractice. Renowned for our adept navigation of intricate medical jargon and complex legal mise en scène, we dedicate ourselves toward preserving the rights of patients mistreated by their trusted healthcare practitioners. Recognized as experts in illustrating factual causality between practitioner error and resultant harm across Illinois state; we meticulously craft compelling court presentations that resonate with jury members. We operate on a contingency basis – ensuring no fees unless recovery is achieved – underlining our unwavering commitment towards client benefit optimization despite financial capabilities. Drawing on extensive resources and expert networks, Carlson Bier investigates every malpractice claim holistically; bringing strategic acumen coupled with visceral passion to champion justice within courts across Fairmount’s jurisdiction region.Feel secure in exploring recourse options with us following harmful professional neglect.Sound representation need not be synonymous with geographical proximity; have confidence in Carlson Bier- proven authority figures eager to fight unjust treatment at the hands of negligent professionals wherever localities lie.

About Carlson Bier

Medical Malpractice Lawyers in Fairmount Illinois

When it comes to practices within the complex landscape of personal injury law, Carlson Bier stands as a beacon for justice and advocacy in Illinois. Our expertise is at its zenith when dealing with Medical Malpractice, an area that often involves complexities in understanding medical jargon, proving negligence on the part of health care providers and seeking deserved compensation under the laws of our state. The focus of every attorney within our cooperative forum lies heavily in acquitting themselves with every intricacy associated with this specific legal realm.

Medical malpractice cases hinge upon determining whether a medical practitioner has veered away from accepted standards of practice leading to harm. This can encompass several sub-categories such as misdiagnosis, childbirth injuries, surgical errors or improper medication dispensation amongst others. It is imperative to understand that not all adverse outcomes following treatment can be characterized as medical malpractice. Legal experts at Carlson Bier can help decipher these distinct differences.

· Misdiagnosis– Misinterpreting symptoms may lead doctors to prescribe incorrect or uninformed treatment resulting in further complications.

· Childbirth Injuries – Negligence before or during childbirth can lead to profound disabilities ranging from seizure disorders to complete paralysis.

· Surgical Errors – Unintended retention of foreign objects post-surgery, operating on the wrong body site or even wrong patient are stark examples.

· Medication Errors – Overdosing, underdosing or prescribing unsuitable medicine resulting from misreading doctor’s handwriting come under this category.

Carlson Bier assures you unstinted support by utilizing its extensive resources and professional commitment towards determining whether you indeed have a case for medical malpractice. Time is of essence here as Illinois implements a two-year statute for filing your claim for compensation- a feat made uncomplicated by our experienced attorneys once we partner with you on your quest.

Some key points about how we manage your case include:

· Meticulous Case Evaluation: We undertake exhaustive research into your ailment, treatment history and resultant distress.

· Expert Deposition: Utilizing medical consultants identifying the negligent act in your care that substantiates our case.

· Aggressive Representation: Implementing a tenacious approach to ensure rectification for the unforeseen suffering you have endured.

Building strong relationships with each client is part of Carlson Bier’s tradition, an element emboldened by our understanding that trust forms the crux of such partnerships. The transparency we maintain relative to legal costs further cements this trust. We advocate for you on a contingent fee basis which essentially means you don’t pay unless we recover compensation on your behalf.

We understand resilience does not mitigate pain nor does courage eradicate trauma. What hope does, though, is pave a path towards restitution; a path where Carlson Bier walks alongside you every step of the way proffering expert guidance and more importantly, empathetic support. Reclamation should not be perceived as a means to undo past harm but rather derive future solace from knowing justice has been served.

Navigate through complex legal landscapes and daunting medical terminologies without trepidation because at Carlson Bier, we endeavor to transform adversity into advocacy right here in Illinois – by being champions for those who cannot advocate for themselves, ensuring their voice will not only be heard but also echoed resoundingly across corridors of justice.

And finally, it’s perfectly fine if all this information sounds overwhelming; after all deciphering legalese isn’t everyone’s forte. That said however; shouldn’t you know how much your case may potentially be worth? Knowledge after all is power and understanding what’s at stake can make all the difference between enduring or overcoming hardship caused by no fault of yours but due to someone else’s negligence.

So why wait? Let us empower you with insights into probable outcomes based on proven precedence- click on the button below now for determining exactly where justice stands waiting – For You! At Carlson Bier, Your Justice – Our Pursuit.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Fairmount Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Frequently Asked Questions

Medical Malpractice FAQ​

Medical malpractice is negligence on the part of a healthcare professional that causes harm to a patient. Negligence occurs when a healthcare professional fails to meet the standard of care that is expected of them.

The most common types of medical malpractice include:

  • Misdiagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional fails to diagnose a patient’s condition correctly.
  • Delayed diagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional does not diagnose a patient’s condition until it is too late.
  • Surgical errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.
  • Medication errors: These errors can include prescribing the wrong medication, prescribing the wrong dosage, or failing to monitor a patient for side effects.
  • Anesthesia errors: These errors can occur during or after surgery.

The signs and symptoms of medical malpractice can vary depending on the type of malpractice that occurred. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Unexplained injuries: This could include injuries that occurred during surgery or injuries that were not properly treated.
  • Worsening condition: If a patient’s condition worsens after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.
  • Unexpected death: If a patient dies unexpectedly after receiving medical care, it may be a sign of medical malpractice.

The treatment options for medical malpractice injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to correct injuries that were caused by medical malpractice.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of medical malpractice injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for medical malpractice if you have been injured due to the negligence of a healthcare professional. A medical malpractice lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Fairmount

Areas of Practice in Fairmount

Bike Mishaps

Specializing in legal assistance for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others's lack of care or unsafe conditions.

Flame Damages

Offering professional legal advice for patients of grave burn injuries caused by incidents or indifference.

Medical Malpractice

Ensuring dedicated legal advice for victims affected by clinical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Commodities Accountability

Dealing with cases involving dangerous products, extending professional legal support to individuals affected by product-related injuries.

Aged Abuse

Protecting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to mistreatment in senior centers environments, ensuring compensation.

Stumble and Trip Injuries

Adept in tackling stumble accident cases, providing legal support to persons seeking justice for their harm.

Birth Injuries

Supplying legal assistance for households affected by medical misconduct resulting in neonatal injuries.

Car Crashes

Accidents: Focused on aiding clients of car accidents obtain fair settlement for harms and damages.

Scooter Crashes

Dedicated to providing legal assistance for motorcyclists involved in bike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for losses.

18-Wheeler Collision

Providing specialist legal support for individuals involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing just compensation for hurts.

Worksite Incidents

Focused on supporting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or recklessness.

Neurological Impairments

Dedicated to offering professional legal advice for patients suffering from neurological injuries due to negligence.

Dog Attack Injuries

Expertise in managing cases for victims who have suffered damages from K9 assaults or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Crashes

Specializing in legal representation for joggers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering recovery.

Unjust Death

Working for families affected by a wrongful death, extending understanding and experienced legal assistance to ensure fairness.

Vertebral Impairment

Dedicated to representing persons with spinal cord injuries, offering specialized legal representation to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer