Construction Site Accident Attorney in Farina

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In the bustling and progressive city of Farina, construction jobs are a crucial part of local growth. However, these workspaces can often become zones of accidental harm. When unfortunate incidents occur on a construction site, you need astute legal guidance to navigate complicated workers’ compensation laws that govern your rights as an injured party. That’s where our distinguished law firm Carlson Bier comes in! We represent victims of Construction Site Accidents with diligence and expertise necessary for achieving optimal outcomes amidst such challenging circumstances. With deep insights into Illinois’s intricate safety regulations and extensive experience in handling complex court cases related to personal injuries, we strive tirelessly to ensure our clients obtain the justice they deserve while safeguarding their rightful compensations. Our dedicated team at Carlson Bier provides personalized attention complemented by rigorous advocacy focused on validating your claims effectively so that you can focus more on recovery than red-tape bureaucracies or insurance paperwork confusion. Don’t struggle alone through unprecedented struggles post-construction accidents; allow the acute legal acumen from Carlson Bier be your sturdy support system during this strenuous time!

About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in Farina Illinois

Carlson Bier champions the rights personal injury victims, specializing explicitly in construction site accidents. As a seasoned law group based out of Illinois, we bring extensive experience and unrivaled expertise to the table, offering personalized advice and expert representation for clients across different tiers.

Construction site accidents can be life-altering experiences that result in severe physical harm or even fatalities. While workers’ compensation might provide some relief, it seldom covers all incurred damages leaving you exposed to financial vulnerabilities. This is where Carlson Bier Attorneys come into play.

Our dedicated attorneys will investigate your case meticulously ensuring your claim accounts for every detail from wage losses to medical bills, disability compensations and any other related damages within legal provision. We commit ourselves towards promoting safety within construction sites as well as attaining justice on behalf of accident victims.

Key aspects elaborated upon by our lawyers include:

• Defending rights against Insurance companies: Despite several insurers frequently downplaying these incidents or possibly avoiding liability, Carlson Bier provides an unyielding front guaranteeing maximum compensation.

• Legal assistance at each step: Our lawyers offer comprehensive support throughout the legal process right from filing your suit until its final resolution.

• Proving negligence: Uncovering cause and effect in such cases requires a high level of expertise which our talented team possesses.

It’s crucial to understand that every accident occurs under unique circumstances making general solutions ineffective. Your case will require tailored blueprints designed strategically after analyzing multiple factors such as incident specifics, parties involved among others. Through this intricate analytical approach, we simplify complexities enabling smooth transitions while focusing on maximizing client compensations ethically & transparently.

Should you find yourself needing assistance over any injuries relating to construction site accidents; whether it involves vehicle collisions on-site premises or tripping hazards resulting from neglected safety protocols – remember help is always at hand! Are you facing a brick wall trying to deal with insurance adjusters and confused about how much compensation you’re legally entitled to? Advisors at Carlson Bier are on hand to navigate you progressively, ensuring you comprehend every detail pertaining to your case.

Undeniably, procedural aspects in legal proceedings can be daunting as well as complicated. Over many years of focused service, Carlson Bier has built a prestigious reputation for its unswerving dedication towards clients – advocating tirelessly for their rights and meticulously driving steps necessary for just redress.

No victims should shoulder extra burdens or grapple with agonizing uncertainties when already battling consequences of personal injuries. With professional guidance from our attorneys at each step of your legal journey, rest assured that owner negligence won’t go unpunished or overlooked while demanding full compensation payout becomes an achievable feat rather than an uphill task.

Remember, construction site accident claims demand precise attention to laws under Illinois’ mandate which only a dedicated group like Carlson Bier can promise prompt delivery on. We go above & beyond providing legal help by reinforcing the crucial principle that every worker’s life matters significantly – thus making it imperative that hazardous work environments causing harm never deteriorate without accountability in place!

If you’ve endured detrimental impacts following accidental incidents on job sites believing justice awaits merely in dreams; click below now! Unearth realistic possibilities stipulated by law awaiting your rightful ownership. Our proficient attorneys will guide you meticulously about how much your unique case is worth and robustly strategize efficient ways of negotiating maximum settlements with minimal delays. Place faith where results speak louder than promises and narratives change lives for better with each passing moment – trust Carlson Bier Law Group today.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Farina Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Farina

Areas of Practice in Farina

Bike Incidents

Focused on legal services for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others' indifference or hazardous conditions.

Flame Wounds

Extending expert legal advice for victims of intense burn injuries caused by mishaps or negligence.

Medical Negligence

Delivering professional legal services for individuals affected by hospital malpractice, including surgical errors.

Commodities Responsibility

Dealing with cases involving problematic products, delivering specialist legal help to clients affected by product malfunctions.

Elder Abuse

Representing the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to abuse in senior centers environments, ensuring fairness.

Fall & Stumble Injuries

Specialist in tackling trip accident cases, providing legal support to clients seeking justice for their losses.

Newborn Traumas

Providing legal help for relatives affected by medical misconduct resulting in newborn injuries.

Automobile Crashes

Accidents: Committed to helping clients of car accidents secure just remuneration for damages and impairment.

Motorcycle Mishaps

Specializing in providing legal advice for individuals involved in bike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for harm.

Truck Mishap

Ensuring adept legal services for victims involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing just recovery for harms.

Construction Site Collisions

Engaged in representing workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or misconduct.

Neurological Impairments

Expert in ensuring specialized legal advice for persons suffering from cerebral injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Injuries

Skilled in managing cases for individuals who have suffered traumas from dog attacks or beast attacks.

Jogger Incidents

Specializing in legal advocacy for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering recovery.

Undeserved Death

Working for families affected by a wrongful death, delivering compassionate and adept legal representation to ensure restitution.

Vertebral Harm

Dedicated to defending persons with spine impairments, offering dedicated legal services to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer