FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Personal Injury Attorney in Farina

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Specializing in personal injury cases, Carlson Bier represents clients seeking justice and rightful compensation. Well-versed in Illinois’s laws, we bring decades of experience to your disposal right from case evaluation to verdict or settlement. We advocate assertively for individuals harmed through negligence, be it automobile accidents, slip-and-fall incidents, product liability issues or other personal injury circumstances. At Carlson Bier we understand the physical and emotional toll an unexpected incident can take on our partons’ lives; that is why we tirelessly fight for them – standing by their side every step legal journey.

We stand out because of our dedicated support throughout these trying phases; leaving no stone unturned via strategic consultation and robust litigation where necessary.

If you’re a Farina resident requiring skilled legal direction while navigating this stormy phase in life—we are ready to assist you with unmatched dedication and expertise! Reach out to us today at Carlson Bier for diligent representation designed specifically keeping Personal Injury claimants’ rights at the core of each action!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Personal Injury Lawyers in Farina Illinois

Welcome to Carlson Bier, your reliable personal injury attorney group servicing clients across Illinois. With profound expertise in personal injury law and a client-first approach, our singular aim is providing you all the legal support you need during life’s most challenging moments.

Personal injuries aren’t just painful; they can also disrupt one’s daily life and well-being. Legal complexities around them should not further compound these difficulties. That’s why it’s crucial to understand what constitutes a personal injury case and appropriately navigate your potential claim.

Firstly, you must comprehend the concept of negligence. In most cases, proving negligence is pivotal as it forms the backbone of many personal injury claims. When another party fails to exercise reasonable care, resulting in harm or damages to someone else, that party may be legally negligent. Examples include an inattentive driver causing a car accident or a store failing to maintain safe conditions leading to customer injuries.

Understanding Illinois’ contributory fault rule is equally essential when dealing with personal injuries within the state because this rule can significantly affect your compensation size. If you are partially at fault for your accident in Illinois, under its “modified comparative negligence” rule, any damages awarded will be reduced by a percentage that equals your amount of liability.

Additionally:

• Although auto accidents are probably the most common type of personal injury cases seen across America, slip-and-fall accidents due to poorly maintained properties are also remarkably frequent.

• Under certain circumstances such as defamation or invasion of privacy, intentional infliction of emotional distress can also form substantive grounds for a lawsuit.

• Illinois has specific time limits on filing lawsuits post-accident or discovering an injury which could potentially hinder pursuit if not enforced within stipulated guidelines.

These are complex issues needing personalized interpretation based on individual case experiences – something our lawyers provide through regular consultation sessions at Carlson Bier.

Henceforth at Carlson Bier we advocate diligence throughout each step on your path towards justice as detailed below:

• Evaluating your injuries meticulously – Not just immediate physical damages, but also potential future medical needs or loss of earning capacity with implications on the total claim at stake.

• Meticulously collecting and preserving evidence – Proof like medical records, eyewitness testimonies, accident scene photos are essential to document extensively a case to secure a fair verdict or settlement.

• Negotiating effectively across all fronts – Attorney-guided negotiations can dramatically enhance chances for maximizing compensation whilst saving time and resources.

The diverse range of personal injury cases requires unique consultation services simultaneously. We don’t believe in one-size-fits-all solutions. Whether you have gnawing worries about how to calculate pain and suffering damages or are unsure if an insurance company’s offer is reasonable, Carlson Bier’s seasoned attorneys will guide you every step of the way.

Moreover, at Carlson Bier we create an environment where our clients feel their concerns validated and resolved appropriately. We ensure maintaining strict confidentiality while handling each client’s sensitive information. We execute strategic legal maneuvers keeping in mind your comfort level throughout litigation processes.

In essence, representing your interests passionately, diligently navigating legal complexities for fairest settlements possible, embody principles of being at service as a premier Illinois personal injury attorney group defining us here at Carlson Bier.

Allow us to ease your burdens during trying times by lending our profound expertise and providing comprehensive support that interdisciplinary legal consultations require. Remember, each case is unique; therefore it mandates variable intrinsic value through differing circumstances amidst multifaceted interpretations among varying players involved – insurance companies, juries or even opposing lawyers!

Embrace proactive action today! As trusted allies in your challenging journey towards justice post-accident trauma – Click on the button below and discover how much potentially your personal injury case could really be worth! Take this small step forward into facilitating impactful alleviation towards life-altering retribution that only trustworthy personal injury attorneys from Carlson Bier can assure compassionately yet competently.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Farina Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Farina

Areas of Practice in Farina

Cycling Incidents

Dedicated to legal advocacy for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' lack of care or unsafe conditions.

Fire Injuries

Extending expert legal advice for sufferers of major burn injuries caused by incidents or carelessness.

Medical Malpractice

Providing professional legal advice for individuals affected by clinical malpractice, including negligent care.

Goods Obligation

Dealing with cases involving unsafe products, offering expert legal help to consumers affected by faulty goods.

Senior Malpractice

Supporting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to misconduct in care facilities environments, ensuring compensation.

Slip & Stumble Mishaps

Adept in handling tumble accident cases, providing legal representation to sufferers seeking compensation for their injuries.

Neonatal Damages

Offering legal assistance for kin affected by medical misconduct resulting in infant injuries.

Auto Crashes

Crashes: Concentrated on guiding sufferers of car accidents get fair compensation for wounds and impairment.

Motorbike Collisions

Focused on providing legal services for bikers involved in scooter accidents, ensuring rightful claims for losses.

Big Rig Accident

Delivering professional legal advice for drivers involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing adequate compensation for hurts.

Building Incidents

Engaged in defending workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Head Damages

Focused on offering specialized legal representation for patients suffering from cerebral injuries due to accidents.

Dog Attack Traumas

Adept at handling cases for clients who have suffered wounds from dog bites or beast attacks.

Jogger Collisions

Focused on legal advocacy for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering claims.

Unjust Demise

Standing up for families affected by a wrongful death, extending compassionate and expert legal representation to ensure compensation.

Neural Damage

Committed to assisting persons with vertebral damage, offering specialized legal representation to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​