...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Forest Lake

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Experiencing a dog bite injury can be traumatic and challenging. The legal intricacies involved may increase the stress of an already distressing situation. You need the expertise of Carlson Bier, specialists in dog bite injuries case management in Illinois. Our team is adept at navigating laws specific to this form of personal injury, creating effective strategies that safeguard your rights whilst ensuring you receive appropriate compensation for medical costs and psychological distress sustained as a result of these unfortunate incidents. We are committed to understanding each client’s unique circumstance; focusing our energies on providing personalized solutions that align with their needs no matter where they reside within Illinois including Forest Lake citizens who require our valued service offerings. Trust Carlson Bier’s proficient approach towards handling your unique situation – we will shoulder the burden leaving you free to focus on recovery while we deliver justice in every dog bite injury case presented before us.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Forest Lake Illinois

At Carlson Bier, a leading personal injury law firm based in Illinois, we specialize in representing clients who have suffered Dog Bite Injuries. A dog bite can be a traumatic event — with implications that extend beyond the physical pain to psychological damage and financial strains associated with medical costs. Your understanding of your rights when it comes to these injuries is crucial.

Dog bites are more common than you might think. Every year, roughly 4.7 million people are bitten by dogs across the United States; approximately one out five bite incidents need medical attention, positioning this issue as one deserving serious consideration and action. It’s important to know that if you’re a victim of such an incident, you are not alone – nor should you have to carry the burdensome aftermath without support and expert counsel.

When it comes to dog bite injuries, there are specific laws in Illinois that protect victims and ensure they receive proper compensation for their suffering caused by neglectful owners or negligent third parties:

• The so-called “One-Bite Rule” is not recognized here; instead, responsibility lies fully on the owner from the first incident.

• Victims may file claims on grounds of negligence if unreasonableness in controlling or restraining the dog led to harm.

• Further damagers like Pain & Suffering and Emotional Distress will never be discarded.

As experienced lawyers specialized in Dog Bite Injury cases in Illinois at Carlson Bier law firm , we navigate these complex legal facets with efficiency – safeguarding your rights while working towards obtaining maximum recovery for your damages.

The passion that fuels our work stems from empathy – we understand just how life-altering a bad encounter can be: hospital bills and doctor’s appointments pile up, work gets missed or becomes too difficult because of physical restrictions or emotional trauma related due to fear provoked by aggressive dogs.

Obtaining representation quickly after an incident occurs is critical for preserving evidence and immediately advocating for your interests against insurance companies. Remember, insurance adjusters are working to reduce payouts where they can — having an attorney represent your needs and fight for your fair compensation is not just a good strategy, it’s a safeguard during a vulnerable time.

From initial case evaluation through potential trial representation, the dedicated team at Carlson Bier puts the well-being of our clients first. Our attorneys won’t pressure you into settling for less than what you deserve – whether that means negotiating with insurance companies or standing up in court to secure just compensation on your behalf.

Moreover, your financial situation should never be a barrier to seeking justice and adequate recompense for what you have had suffered. That’s why we take personal injury cases on contingency-fee agreements – meaning no charges until we win or positively resolve your case. Simply put: if you don’t get paid, neither do we!

Dog bite injuries can result in physical markings that heal with time – but not without forming scars both visible and hidden underneath everyday smiles; emotional upheavals since such incidents hold the potential to stir lasting trauma as well as significant monetary stress due to mounting medical bills and unexpected expenses due accident related absenteeism from work!

At Carlson Bier law firm, we stand by ready to help guide victims of dog bite injuries through the often-complex legal process ahead whilst enabling them regain control over their lives post such an incident. Just click on the ‘Find Out How Much Your Case Worth’ button available below this paragraph and start moving forward towards resolving your trauma effectively supported by deep-rooted professional expertise ensuring maximum beneficial outcome!

Remember: You’re not alone in this journey . In fact, is there any better assurance than knowing experienced specialized attorneys like us are standing right by side? Explore how our services may benefit you amidst these challenging times, and let’s together draw strength out of adversity harnessing our professional acumen aimed at securing justice lying within reach!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Forest Lake Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Forest Lake

Areas of Practice in Forest Lake

Cycling Crashes

Focused on legal advocacy for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' indifference or hazardous conditions.

Thermal Injuries

Offering expert legal help for individuals of grave burn injuries caused by mishaps or recklessness.

Clinical Incompetence

Providing expert legal advice for patients affected by medical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Items Fault

Handling cases involving dangerous products, delivering skilled legal support to consumers affected by harmful products.

Aged Neglect

Defending the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to misconduct in aged care environments, ensuring compensation.

Stumble & Fall Incidents

Adept in dealing with fall and trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to clients seeking recovery for their losses.

Neonatal Traumas

Extending legal assistance for households affected by medical negligence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Auto Incidents

Crashes: Devoted to helping sufferers of car accidents get reasonable payout for wounds and harm.

Motorbike Incidents

Expert in providing legal assistance for bikers involved in scooter accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for harm.

Truck Accident

Ensuring adept legal support for victims involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing fair recompense for harms.

Construction Site Crashes

Focused on supporting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or negligence.

Brain Injuries

Expert in ensuring compassionate legal advice for persons suffering from head injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Bite Injuries

Proficient in dealing with cases for clients who have suffered damages from dog attacks or beast attacks.

Jogger Incidents

Specializing in legal representation for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Unjust Loss

Striving for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, supplying compassionate and adept legal representation to ensure compensation.

Spinal Cord Damage

Committed to supporting victims with spine impairments, offering specialized legal support to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer