Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Fox River Grove

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you, or anyone close to you, have amazingly found yourselves as victims of dog bite injuries within the Fox River Grove vicinity, look no further than Carlson Bier. We are highly skilled personal injury attorneys equipped with a wealth of experience in successfully handling complex dog bite cases. Our reputable law firm has earned recognition from many clients for our outstanding commitment to securing maximum compensation that our clients genuinely deserve. At Carlson Bier we understand how daunting a process it can be after enduring an unexpected and traumatic circumstance such as a dog bite incident. This is why we’re widely known for offering comprehensive legal support backed by relentless advocacy aimed at uncompromising protection of your rights while ensuring justice is served swiftly and fairly. Moreover, our specialized knowledge gives us unique insights into the intricacies tied to local laws surrounding canine-inflicted injuries in Illinois which allows us to deliver fully personalized strategies tailored towards winning your case efficiently and effectively.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Fox River Grove Illinois

At Carlson Bier, your welfare is our utmost priority. We are a distinguished personal injury law firm based in Illinois, having the ability and resources to champion the rights of those who have suffered due to someone else’s negligence. Today, we share important information related to Dog Bite Injuries – crucial knowledge that you need to arm yourself with should you ever find yourself, or a loved one victimized by this breed of personal injuries.

One may overlook dog bites as minor occurrences but statistics illuminate otherwise. According to Centers for Disease Control (CDC), around 4.7 million individuals in America fall victim to dog bites annually, with 800,000 necessitating medical care. The risk factors are high for both adults and children alike which verifies the serious nature of this issue.

Understanding liability after a dog bite incident can be complicated as situations vary broadly regarding who is at fault. Here’s where the importance of an experienced attorney surfaces; guiding you on navigating through unchartered territory and advocating your rights vigorously.

• Demonstrating owner’s negligence: Illinois adopts strict laws surrounding dog owners’ liability post-bite incident if it can be proved that the pet was not provoked priorly.

• Determining Liability: Even when the owner was unaware of their pet’s aggressive tendencies, they might still bear full responsibility for damages caused.

• Anchor Equal Responsibility Rule: If it can be established that the victim contributed towards instigating the animal then he/she could potentially shoulder partial blame – known as comparative negligence.

Dog Bite Injuries harm victims physically and mentally; puncture wounds or scars remind them perpetually about their trauma causing severe emotional distress aside from physical injuries like fractures or infections capable of resulting in long-term health impairments.

In such instances, seeking compensation becomes pivotal covering costs like medical bills due post-injury treatment and subsequent therapy sessions aiming for recovery besides loss wages during convalescence period impacting income flow adversely.

Strategic legal steps Carlson Bier undertakes post-consultation revolves around investigating the incident meticulously, analyzing medical records alongside potential future treatment needs, and determining fair compensation. Crafting a robust legal strategy specifically catering to your unique circumstances aids in securing maximum possible settlement or verdict.

An essential factor weighing into the potential claim value is the severity of injuries; traumatic brain injury or permanent scarring inflicts substantial impact on claim amount. Likewise, increased damages (punitive) might come into play if it gets unveiled that pet owner behaved particularly recklessly disregarding safety norms consciously.

• Evidence Gathering: Photographs showing injuries, medical records pinpointing extent of damage, along with eyewitnesses accounts serve as influential evidence.

• Medical Documentation: Doctor prognosis regarding extent of injuries suffered and future potential treatments substantially validates claims.

• Legal counsel guidance: A proficient attorney can efficiently negotiate with insurance agencies presenting a strong case for appropriate settlement.

No matter how straightforward your dog bite case may seem on the surface, having an expert attorney by your side could make all the difference between getting under-compensated and receiving full rightful justice for your ordeal. The journey towards achieving satisfactory verdict starts by understanding what you are entitled to rightfully and legally.

Our dedicated attorneys at Carlson Bier help educate you about these entitlements while guiding every step so that you successfully traverse this challenging phase equipped with towering support alongside adept representation ensuring successful outcome with superior client satisfaction.

Now comes an imperative question – “How much is my case worth?” What you truly need is a comprehensive analysis taking myriad factors like type & severity of injury into account besides others deciding final case valuation such as loss ability to earn or any emotional distress caused amongst many more elements woven intricately into this determination process.

Allow us to assist. Our team stands ready to unravel complexities surrounding determining true worth your variegated damages hold driven firmly by our commitment delivering effective solutions seeking lawful recourse converting disastrous situations towards brighter outcomes. How? It’s just a click away. Don’t remain tethered by hesitations, click on the button below and discover your case’s potential value today so we can start advocating for nothing less than what you rightfully deserve.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Fox River Grove Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Fox River Grove

Areas of Practice in Fox River Grove

Bike Mishaps

Specializing in legal representation for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' indifference or dangerous conditions.

Burn Injuries

Offering specialist legal support for people of grave burn injuries caused by mishaps or indifference.

Hospital Carelessness

Offering experienced legal support for individuals affected by physician malpractice, including surgical errors.

Commodities Responsibility

Managing cases involving defective products, extending adept legal guidance to clients affected by faulty goods.

Nursing Home Mistreatment

Representing the rights of elders who have been subjected to malpractice in care facilities environments, ensuring justice.

Stumble & Tumble Mishaps

Expert in managing tumble accident cases, providing legal services to individuals seeking restitution for their harm.

Neonatal Injuries

Providing legal support for kin affected by medical negligence resulting in newborn injuries.

Automobile Mishaps

Mishaps: Concentrated on assisting sufferers of car accidents secure reasonable settlement for damages and losses.

Motorbike Incidents

Focused on providing legal advice for victims involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring justice for injuries.

Big Rig Incident

Extending specialist legal representation for victims involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing adequate settlement for injuries.

Worksite Mishaps

Engaged in representing workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or negligence.

Brain Traumas

Dedicated to delivering expert legal advice for patients suffering from neurological injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Damages

Expertise in managing cases for victims who have suffered damages from dog attacks or beast attacks.

Jogger Mishaps

Expert in legal services for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering claims.

Unfair Fatality

Striving for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, offering caring and expert legal assistance to ensure justice.

Vertebral Impairment

Committed to assisting patients with spinal cord injuries, offering specialized legal support to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer