Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Galena

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with the life-altering aftermath of a spinal cord injury, securing the legal advocacy of Carlson Bier could mean the difference between resettlement and financial ruin. With unrivaled dedication, our skilled team focuses on understanding each client’s unique situation while fighting tenaciously to recover maximum compensation for their losses. Our proficiency in handling these challenging cases has led many individuals across Illinois to trust us with their most sensitive matters. Striving beyond mere representation, we at Carlson Bier empathize deeply with the hardships associated with such injuries: loss of mobility, long-term care needs and emotional distress are some battles our clients confront daily; confronting them shouldn’t feel insurmountable. And so doing justice means fighting for it— tooth-and-nail attention towards healthcare providers, insurance companies —our tireless advocates ensure your rights get upheld all through this grueling process. Trusting Carlson Bier is not about hiring someone who merely understands laws pertaining to spinal cord injuries; it’s entrusting those who understand your fight against unseen struggles that stem from such devastating injuries.

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Galena Illinois

As expert personal injury lawyers at Carlson Bier, a top-rated Illinois law firm, we pride ourselves on our deep knowledge and experience in successfully handling Spinal Cord Injury cases. We understand the difficulty and complexity that come with spinal cord injuries which often result from severe accidents or even medical negligence. You are not alone in this as we strive to support you through this difficult moment, providing expertise that will secure the compensation you rightly deserve for your ordeal.

Understanding the circumstances surrounding spinal cord injuries is vital in proceeding towards legal action. Such an injury can be divided into two categories – complete and incomplete. A complete spinal cord injury results in total loss of movement and sensation below the site of damage indicating a severe disruption of communication between the brain and body. In contrast, while an incomplete injury also causes significant impairment, some degree of motion or feeling remains intact.

Several noteworthy factors can increase susceptibility to spinal cord injuries; age being one prime factor as elderly individuals tend to be more prone due to falls causing traumatic injuries. Another major problem involves vehicular accidents leading to whiplash or other forceful impacts resulting in trauma-induced injuries—known for causing debilitating damages like paralysis,

Additionally, these types of personal injuries are associated with a large number of complementary health issues including respiratory complications caused by weakened lungs leading to pneumonia or other infections.. These conditions don’t just wreak havoc physically but mentally too, draining sufferers emotionally whilst amplifying anxiety or depression levels.

• Severe Pain

• Difficulty Breathing

• Paralysis

• Loss Of Bodily Functions

Please note that every case differs vastly dependent on individual circumstances therefore understanding the cause behind your situation helps lay solid groundwork when building robust legal strategies aiming at optimal results.

The effects stemming from a spinal cord injury are catastrophic altering lives dramatically requiring substantial adjustments tabooed by societal norms deterring quality life sustainability hence why it’s only fair victims receive full compensation alleviating ongoing hardship experienced daily post-injury occurrence. Rest assured knowing Carlson Bier’s meticulous analysis backed by years of successful track record ensures sustained fight against injustice bringing your case to a deserved resolution.

We proudly excel in all aspects concerning personal injury cases particularly emphasizing spinal cord injuries with an exemplary reputation built on persistent dedication towards victim rights protection across Illinois majestically standing tall amongst peers due to aggressive tactics securing impressive settlements for clients that far exceed expectations. We dig deep, investigating the intricacies of each matter, making well-calculated moves coordinating with insurance companies or confronting offenders directly thereby maintaining procedural aggression right till judgement day.

Being represented by competent legal minds helps navigate through challenging moments like finding suitable medical care providers ensuring quick recovery. Furthermore, managing accumulated piles of bills while focusing on regaining health can be reduced significantly when you have experts at your service. At Carlson Bier, we make sure you’re not burdened further, providing comprehensive relief strategies.

Navigating pathways that lead to healthy recovery and financial stability post-traumatic events requires expert guidance which is exactly what our team at Carlson Bier excels in offering personalized solutions tailored specifically per individual needs – this dedicated approach constituting victim support throughout proceedings till fruition pampers sufferers allowing mental stress reduction aiding swift healing inevitably elevating satisfaction levels.

Your journey doesn’t need to be lonely; click the button below for immediate assistance without obligations from specialists who sincerely believe in justice meant for everyone. Are you interested to know if there’s light awaiting at the end of this seemingly endless tunnel? Discover today how much your case could potentially be worth – Let us help transform struggles into strength leading towards a brighter future ahead.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Galena Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Galena

Areas of Practice in Galena

Bicycle Mishaps

Focused on legal support for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' indifference or perilous conditions.

Burn Damages

Supplying adept legal assistance for people of severe burn injuries caused by mishaps or misconduct.

Physician Incompetence

Extending professional legal support for persons affected by healthcare malpractice, including surgical errors.

Goods Accountability

Handling cases involving unsafe products, supplying specialist legal guidance to customers affected by defective items.

Senior Neglect

Representing the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to mistreatment in aged care environments, ensuring fairness.

Slip & Trip Injuries

Adept in dealing with stumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to individuals seeking recovery for their suffering.

Infant Injuries

Providing legal support for kin affected by medical misconduct resulting in childbirth injuries.

Vehicle Mishaps

Accidents: Concentrated on guiding individuals of car accidents obtain equitable compensation for wounds and losses.

Motorbike Mishaps

Focused on providing legal services for victims involved in scooter accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for traumas.

Semi Collision

Ensuring expert legal assistance for victims involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing adequate claims for losses.

Construction Site Accidents

Dedicated to supporting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or misconduct.

Cognitive Injuries

Dedicated to extending professional legal assistance for clients suffering from cerebral injuries due to incidents.

K9 Assault Harms

Specialized in dealing with cases for individuals who have suffered damages from puppy bites or wildlife encounters.

Pedestrian Accidents

Specializing in legal representation for walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering claims.

Unjust Fatality

Striving for families affected by a wrongful death, extending sensitive and skilled legal assistance to ensure fairness.

Neural Injury

Committed to defending victims with spine impairments, offering expert legal services to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer