...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Car Accident Attorney in Gifford

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Safeguard your legal rights with Carlson Bier, the eminent choice when searching for professional guidance in car accident cases. Servicing Gifford and surrounding areas, we extend our expertise steeped in unrivaled experience to victims of vehicular accidents. Each Car Accident attorney at our firm diligently leverages their extensive knowledge to navigate the complexities of personal injury litigation on behalf of clients like you. We’re committed to managing your case professionally while prioritizing open communication and personalized service tailored explicitly around your individual needs. We understand that each incidence generates unique challenges; hence, we ceaselessly strive to render an approach bespoke to every situation’s specifics. Moreover, selecting us as your legal ally assures prompt responses and secured justice; when it comes to a law firm embodying both genuine empathy for its clientele concurrently with meticulously competent professionalism: think Carlson Bier! Trust us —your optimal advocate— who keenly work towards ensuring rectified outcomes serving best interest mitigating fallout from such unfortunate episodes in life.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Car Accident Lawyers in Gifford Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are more than just attorneys; we’re advocates for individuals experiencing the turmoil associated with car accidents. Being based in Illinois and possessing vast knowledge of state laws, we are adept at navigating through complexities to ensure that justice prevails. We emphasize providing personalized attention as every case differs from the other, requiring a unique approach.

Car accidents are unfortunate situations that have devastating consequences. Injuries can range from minor scrapes and bruises to more serious complications such as head trauma or spinal cord injuries. They not only affect one’s physical health but also inflict emotional fatigue and financial strain—issues that most victims struggle with post-accident.

The immediate aftermath involves an array of overwhelming challenges:

•Dealing with medical expenses while recovering from injuries,

•Coping with loss of income due to inability to work,

•Managing property damage repairs,

•Pursuing insurance claims which usually involve lengthy processes.

Knowing your rights is vital in such instances. As a victim, you are entitled to claim compensation if negligence of another party was involved — this often necessitates hiring a personal injury lawyer who can proficiently represent your interests.

This is where our expertise comes into play at Carlson Bier: The aim is to fight for maximum possible compensation on behalf of the client.

Our primary responsibilities in car accident cases include but aren’t limited to:

•Investigating the circumstances surrounding the crash thoroughly, scrutinize police reports and engage experts if needed.

•Identifying liable parties; whether it’s a negligent driver or perhaps faulty vehicle parts leading back to manufacturers or suppliers being responsible.

•Negotiating skillfully with insurance companies ensuring rightful settlement.

•In instances where fair compensation isn’t offered, proceeding aggressively towards litigation serves as our alternative strategy.

Understanding car accident lawsuits may be challenging without a legal background. Essentially, these suits are lodged under ‘tort law’ seeking damages for personal injuries caused by others’ negligent actions. Major components in these cases are:

•Establishing liability – demonstrating that the accused acted negligently.

•Presenting solid proof of injuries– this includes medical records, testimony from health professionals, photographs etc.

•Substantiating losses incurred – both economic and non-economic which could range from lost wages and medical bills to pain and suffering.

Efficiency coupled with dedicated service is what makes Carlson Bier a reliable legal ally. However, it’s essential to point out that we uphold Illinois law by truthfully representing our physical presence. We are intentionally transparent regarding our locality not being Gifford—compliance to state law is paramount for us; hence any implications otherwise stand incorrect.

Real-time experience has nurtured our team to develop strategic tactics combating defense lawyers or insurance adjusters who may possibly undervalue your claim. This kind of rigorous representation seeks tangible results preventing car accident victims from bearing unjust financial burdens.

In an effort to bring more value to our clients, we offer contingent charge basis services meaning you’d only pay attorney fees if compensation is successfully recovered on your behalf—a clear signifier of Carlson Bier standing firmly with you every step of the way till justice served rightfully!

Understanding whether your case holds sufficient ground for claims can be daunting given complex legal terminologies. Therefore, we invite you towards a free initial consultation enabling thorough analysis by our experienced personal injury attorneys at Carlson Bier. Explore the potential worth of your case by clicking the button below now! Let’s tackle obstacles together because when it comes down to fighting for your rights —We’re All In!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Gifford Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Car Accident FAQ​

The most common causes of car accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause drivers to lose control of their vehicles.
  • Vehicle defects: Defective vehicles can cause accidents in a variety of ways.
  • Weather conditions: Rain, snow, and ice can make roads slick and dangerous.

If you are involved in a car accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a car accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a car accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a car accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

In a car accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

    Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your vehicle.

    Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for car accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Gifford

Areas of Practice in Gifford

Bicycle Incidents

Expert in legal services for people injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' carelessness or dangerous conditions.

Burn Burns

Supplying adept legal support for people of grave burn injuries caused by mishaps or misconduct.

Hospital Incompetence

Delivering specialist legal advice for persons affected by healthcare malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Merchandise Accountability

Managing cases involving problematic products, delivering skilled legal services to consumers affected by product malfunctions.

Elder Neglect

Protecting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to neglect in nursing homes environments, ensuring justice.

Fall and Tumble Incidents

Skilled in handling tumble accident cases, providing legal representation to persons seeking recovery for their losses.

Infant Traumas

Extending legal guidance for relatives affected by medical negligence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Automobile Accidents

Accidents: Dedicated to supporting individuals of car accidents get just recompense for injuries and harm.

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Dedicated to providing representation for motorcyclists involved in bike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for damages.

Semi Crash

Providing specialist legal support for clients involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing just recovery for damages.

Worksite Collisions

Engaged in representing employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or recklessness.

Cerebral Impairments

Committed to ensuring professional legal advice for victims suffering from neurological injuries due to negligence.

Dog Attack Injuries

Adept at managing cases for individuals who have suffered damages from canine attacks or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Crashes

Expert in legal advocacy for joggers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering claims.

Unwarranted Death

Advocating for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, extending caring and professional legal representation to ensure compensation.

Vertebral Injury

Focused on supporting victims with paralysis, offering compassionate legal guidance to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​