...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Bicycle Accidents in Hanna City

Bicycle Accidents Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In Hanna City, countless bicyclists ride daily for leisure and commuting. With the increase in cycling comes an uptick in bike-related accidents— an area where Carlson Bier stands out as a pivotal ally. As seasoned Bicycle Accident attorneys, we have formidable experience litigating such cases with impressive success rates. We specialize not only in legal representation but also navigating insurance intricacies to secure maximum compensations for our clients. Owing to its extensive knowledge and dedication, Carlson Bier has emerged as the preferred partner when seeking just resolution following bicycle mishaps throughout Illinois state jurisdiction that includes Hanna City too. Our client testimonials reflect unequaled proficiency and unwavering commitment towards securing fair settlements for victims of bicycle accidents while safeguarding their rights steadfastly till justice is served unequivocally.

So remember: For workbook expertise dealing with complex injury claims related specifically to Bicycle Accidents – Look no further than Carlson Bier!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Bicycle Accidents Lawyers in Hanna City Illinois

Welcome to Carlson Bier, a leading personal injury attorney group based in Illinois committed to protecting the rights of bicyclists. Offering unparalleled representation to victims of bicycle accidents, our mission is guided by a deep belief: That everyone has the right to travel safely and when this right is violated due to negligence or ill intent, justice must be sought.

Bicycle accidents can occur unexpectedly and have traumatic consequences. Often underscored by an interplay of various factors such as hazardous road conditions, motorist negligence or defective bicycle equipment, these incidents require meticulous legal review. At Carlson Bier, we bring decades of experience aiding victims navigate through this complex terrain.

Firstly, it’s important to recognise key characteristics associated with bike-related accidents:

– Disproportionately high risk: Though cyclists make up just 1% of all road users, they account for a higher percentage of fatalities and injuries.

– Head Injuries: Cyclists are particularly vulnerable to head injuries which constitute over 60% of all bicycle-related deaths.

– Visibility Issues: More often than not, drivers claim they did not see the cyclist until it was too late.

These elements underscore why expertise like ours at Carlson Bier is crucial following a bicycle accident. As we dig deeper into your case facts considering peculiarities such as these, we map out an effective litigation course perfectly tailored for you.

Furthermore, it’s critical you understand that Illinois law firmly supports cyclists’ right-of-way in multiple scenarios—a fact commonly overlooked but expertly harnessed by us during negotiations aimed at maximizing your deserved settlement value. Whether navigating aggressive insurance companies who try underestimating your rightful compensation or representing you skilfully in court if need be – rest assured knowing that your interest remains paramount on our agenda consistently towards effecting full and fair restitution for your losses.

In addition to financial recovery for medical expenses and loss wages encountered due to the mishap among others – Emotional damages endured, such as pain and suffering, impairment of your daily life activities, psychological trauma are also factored in to rightly measure the extent of loss you have dealt with. Our legal expertise ensures all aspects of your losses are not overlooked while securing the representative settlement.

Also well established is our ability to recover from cases labeled as ‘hit-and-run’. Even though apprehending the culpable driver might be challenging or impossible in some instances, various viable options still remain open: Uninsured motorist coverage for example, can service these claims. Rest assured knowing that we stop at no ends towards unfolding all available means capable of ensuring you receive full and fitting restitution.

At Carlson Bier we understand how distressing dealing with a bicycle accident aftermath could be – especially when parties legally responsible try making light of their liability. This makes contacting us even more urgent so together we can start charting out an effective path towards restoring normalcy in this time of turbulence.

Do not let anxiety or confusion hinder you from seeking rightful compensation needed for recovery. Remember that consultation with our team is absolutely free and without obligation till commitment on both ends. Let our attorneys bring much needed clarity upon initial assessment uncovering possibilities that might previously appear unfathomabale..

Finally, if you’ve been involved in a bicycle accident and want a personal injury attorney who will tirelessly advocate for your rights then consider becoming one amongst our many delighted clientele enjoying resurgence having got back up stronger after an unfortunate incident – it starts by clicking on the button below to discover just how much your case may be worth.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Hanna City Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Bicycle Accident FAQ

The most common causes of bicycle accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield to cyclists.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause cyclists to lose control of their bikes.
  • Cyclist errors: This can include riding against traffic, failing to use lights at night, and not wearing a helmet.

If you are injured in a bicycle accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a bicycle accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a bicycle accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a bicycle accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your bicycle

The statute of limitations for bicycle accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Hanna City

Areas of Practice in Hanna City

Pedal Cycle Incidents

Proficient in legal advocacy for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' negligence or dangerous conditions.

Scald Damages

Giving skilled legal services for victims of severe burn injuries caused by occurrences or misconduct.

Hospital Misconduct

Delivering experienced legal assistance for victims affected by clinical malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Items Responsibility

Managing cases involving faulty products, offering specialist legal support to victims affected by product malfunctions.

Geriatric Malpractice

Protecting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to misconduct in aged care environments, ensuring justice.

Trip & Trip Mishaps

Adept in addressing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal advice to individuals seeking restitution for their harm.

Birth Injuries

Delivering legal guidance for families affected by medical negligence resulting in infant injuries.

Auto Mishaps

Collisions: Devoted to assisting clients of car accidents get equitable recompense for injuries and harm.

Motorcycle Incidents

Committed to providing legal services for bikers involved in bike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for damages.

18-Wheeler Collision

Extending experienced legal representation for persons involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing adequate recovery for harms.

Building Incidents

Engaged in representing workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or negligence.

Neurological Traumas

Specializing in providing expert legal support for persons suffering from cognitive injuries due to incidents.

Dog Attack Injuries

Specialized in addressing cases for clients who have suffered traumas from dog bites or wildlife encounters.

Foot-traveler Incidents

Dedicated to legal services for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering recovery.

Undeserved Demise

Standing up for families affected by a wrongful death, delivering understanding and skilled legal support to ensure redress.

Spine Impairment

Committed to defending clients with vertebral damage, offering compassionate legal support to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​