Construction Site Accident Attorney in Harrison

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When unfortunate accidents occur on construction sites, it’s vital to have the right expertise in your corner. At Carlson Bier, we offer premier representation for Construction Site Accident cases by providing dedicated and experienced attorneys who prioritize your rights and interests. Our adept team of lawyers has a proven record of success in handling complex construction accident lawsuits with professionalism and skill. Armed with unparalleled knowledge of Illinois laws and regulations surrounding these types of incidents, they are well positioned to help you seek the justice you deserve. They take every case seriously, meticulously examining every detail to ensure compelling arguments that yield favorable outcomes for our clients.Therefore, if working or simply being around a construction site leads to injury due to negligence or lack of safety measures,it is without hesitation that Carlson Bier should be considered as your preferred choice; offering you personalized service tailored at meeting demands specific only to Construction Site Accidents. Trust us with effective legal representation firmly rooted towards ensuring accountability from all responsible quarters while securing fair compensation for any damages incurred other wise .Trust the best , trust Carson Bier!

About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in Harrison Illinois

Suffering a personal injury as a consequence of an incident on a construction site can leave you facing physical harm, mental distress, and financial strife. Fortunately, Carlson Bier, renowned personal injury attorneys based in Illinois are here to help increase your understanding of construction site accidents. We fervently believe in the principle that victims should not bear burdens caused by the negligence or disregard for safety displayed by others.

Construction site incidents tend to be complex due to the nature of worksites and the myriad parties involved — from contractors and subcontractors to equipment providers and property owners. Complications often escalate when multiple companies with overlapping responsibilities operate concurrently within one location. This likely increases opportunities for hazardous issues such as faulty machinery, improper maintenance, inadequate training, careless operations, or ineffective safety measures.

Yet it is critical for all involved entities at any working establishment to enforce basic safety standards prescribed by law; designed specifically to shield workers from foreseeable dangers inherent in their line of work:

• Regulations necessitate security gadgets like hard hats or harnesses.

• Guidelines insist upon systematic inspections of group equipment and heavy machinery.

• Standards demand ongoing safety training for employees.

• Measures request suitable warning signs posted around potential danger zones.

Regrettably though, these precautions aren’t always adhered to effectively which may lead directly or indirectly towards causing serious injuries including but not limited to broken bones, electrocution burns or even traumatic brain injuries. Given this perspective into the complexities surrounding work-related mishaps it becomes essential you understand your legal position after experiencing undue suffering through absolutely no fault of your own:

You have Rights: As an injured individual on a job site – regardless if you’re an employee or non-worker present at the scene – you have rights protected under the law seeking compensation for losses suffered

You deserve Compensation: You retain entitlements allowing recovery of damages related predominately but not exclusively to medical expenses trauma-induced stress wage loss future earnings’ impairment amongst others

Liability varies: Invariably injuries arise via assigned tasks or associated hazards so identifying liable parties – contractors equipment manufacturers property owners etc may determine your claim’s successful outcome

We at Carlson Bier are fully committed to representing victims of construction site accidents. Our solid track record testifies for our dedication and expertise in tackling such demanding and intricate situations. Leveraging comprehensive knowledge in Illinois’ personal injury law we foster strong legal strategies with a tactical understanding which aids in meticulously evaluating the validity of your claim, seriousness of injury, calculation of rewards deserved after determining eligible compensation channels while considering prospective setbacks and ways to navigate through them most efficiently.

Skilled in negotiations against staunch insurance corporations, our lawyers do not hesitate going beyond limitations whenever necessary; contesting litigation in court advocating relentlessly on our clients’ behalf ensuring justice delivered alongside maximized reparations rightfully earned.

Remember though – every case is unique exhibiting distinct facets related closely to specificities embedding personal injury attributions due to construction site accidents thereby necessitating expert counsel adept at dealing effectively within such convoluted landscapes. Hence assistance from distinguished attorneys formulating nuanced strategies reflecting personal intricacies could invariably influence positive results tipping scales towards your favor.

In confiding with Carlson Bier – you choose experience competence and compassion bound together by an unwavering commitment towards serving justice that solicits rightful compensations patients endure chiefly deserving families affected indirectly soaking brunt instigated by haphazard conditions incited majorly through squirreled responsibilities’ negligence. We stand firm challenging daunting odds stacked up frequently within this tumultuous battleground marked distinctly under covers of construction sites rightly recognised as one amongst dangerous terrains surfacing across various working habitats dominant mostly under industrial shadows casting long lines winding tautly among countless lives intersected circumferentially around common threads knotted tight around shared concerns touching base collateral damages suffering unprecedented causal effects resulting directly from unforeseen accidents impacting adversely unsuspecting individuals linked intimately often bearing scars reminding constantly tragic episodes triggered unfortunately through unchecked causes founded predominantly under ignorance lackadaisical attitudes or plain disregard typically towards safety.

Click below and let us help ascertain what your case might be worth. Protecting rights, securing futures – Carlton Bier, for justice that matters.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Harrison Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Harrison

Areas of Practice in Harrison

Cycling Mishaps

Focused on legal advocacy for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' indifference or risky conditions.

Flame Traumas

Supplying specialist legal services for individuals of intense burn injuries caused by occurrences or carelessness.

Hospital Carelessness

Providing specialist legal assistance for clients affected by clinical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Goods Responsibility

Handling cases involving faulty products, delivering professional legal help to consumers affected by defective items.

Senior Neglect

Protecting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to misconduct in care facilities environments, ensuring restitution.

Fall and Fall Accidents

Professional in managing fall and trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to individuals seeking recovery for their losses.

Childbirth Wounds

Delivering legal assistance for kin affected by medical malpractice resulting in infant injuries.

Automobile Collisions

Accidents: Concentrated on guiding patients of car accidents gain fair recompense for harms and impairment.

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Focused on providing representation for motorcyclists involved in scooter accidents, ensuring rightful claims for losses.

Semi Mishap

Ensuring experienced legal advice for individuals involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing fair settlement for injuries.

Worksite Accidents

Concentrated on representing laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or irresponsibility.

Cerebral Harms

Committed to providing compassionate legal support for patients suffering from cerebral injuries due to incidents.

K9 Assault Harms

Proficient in dealing with cases for people who have suffered damages from K9 assaults or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Collisions

Focused on legal services for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering recovery.

Undeserved Loss

Advocating for families affected by a wrongful death, supplying compassionate and expert legal support to ensure justice.

Spine Damage

Committed to advocating for persons with spine impairments, offering specialized legal assistance to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer