FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Products Liability Attorney in Highland

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’re in need of expert Products Liability representation, look no further than Carlson Bier. Based in Illinois, our exceptional team is renowned for its robust understanding of the intricacies that come with such cases. Our attorneys navigate all aspects of product liability claims with precision and dedication to secure rightful compensation for victims who have suffered injuries or damages due to defective products. With a proven track record built on years of professional experience, we diligently work to hold defaulting manufacturers accountable for their actions. At Carlson Bier, we understand the dire implications Product Liabilities can have on one’s life and livelihood; hence our rigorous approach towards upholding your rights affordably and effectively. We advocate primarily in Highland city proffering first-rate legal counsel while tirelessly advancing your interests at every turn – this underscores why we are ideally suited to handle your case regardless of its complexities or nuances. Your peace of mind drives our commitment: trust in Carlson Bier as an exemplary choice when selecting a knowledgeable Products Liability attorney group amidst tumultuous times.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Products Liability Lawyers in Highland Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our expertise extends beyond the ordinary personal injury claims frequently seen in Illinois. Our team of seasoned attorneys has particular prowess in dealing with complex products liability cases, consistently delivering outstanding results for our clients.

Products Liability refers to a specific legal area where manufacturers, distributors, suppliers, retailers or other parties involved in the production and distribution chain of goods can be held responsible if a product they release into the market is defective and causes harm to consumers. The sphere of Products Liability comprises three primary types of defects including manufacturing defects that occur during the production process; design defects relating to fundamental flaws which make a product inherently dangerous regardless of its manufacture quality; as well as marketing defects that may involve inadequate safety warnings or instructions.

In contrast with many fields of law, where you must prove negligence on behalf of another party to establish your claim successfully under Illinois law, proving negligence isn’t always necessary within Products Liability. Instead, ‘strict liability’ often applies here– this means that you only need to show that the product was indeed defective and that this defect caused your injury.

When navigating through Products Liability cases in Illinois, obtaining success requires knowledge specifically catered towards these cases’ unique circumstances. Here are some key facets about proceeding with such claims:

• A quick response is vital: Immediate investigation into the incident could help preserve crucial evidence.

• Expert opinion matters: Evidence from medical professionals or industry experts may significantly bolster a case.

• Not every injury leads to compensation: To receive compensation using a products liability claim under Illinois law it’s mandatory for an individual to have incurred financial losses (such as lost earnings), physical injuries, suffering or emotional distress due to use of defective products.

These claims can often be complicated because they typically involve large corporations armed with powerful legal resources. That’s why effective representation from knowledgeable and experienced personal injury attorneys like us at Carlson Bier is essential. Though no guarantee can be made regarding any legal outcome, our team has a proven track record of achieving exceptional results in this domain through our thorough investigative skills and high-quality legal advocacy. Our team takes pride not just on the impressive verdicts and settlements we have obtained for our clients but also on strong professional relationships we build with them.

At Carlson Bier, every client is treated as an individual. We delve into each case’s unique aspects, developing a strategic approach to help ensure maximum compensation for the damages suffered. This includes focusing intently on proving product’s defectiveness which caused the injury, presenting persuasive evidence about the extent and effect of injuries sustained by victim and effective negotiation with parties at fault and insurance companies.

Placing utmost importance on transparency and honest communication, we continuously strive to keep our clients well-informed about their case status and what they can expect from us throughout the litigation process.

This website is dedicated to providing you more valuable information about products liability under Illinois law – answering your queries regarding its complexity while demonstrating how at Carlson Bier we can make it easy be understood by anyone using straightforward language – no legalese or complicated phrases here.

You may likely wonder what financial compensation you’re entitled to following your ordeal. Are you curious? So are we! Clicking on the button below will lead you directly to find how much your personal injury claim could potentially be worth based on prevailing Illinois laws. Remember, every case is different; let’s discover together exactly what value yours holds! At Carlson Bier, we won’t settle until justice is accommodated for everyone injured due to defective products because of others’ negligence or errors.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Highland Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Product Liability FAQ​

Product liability is the legal responsibility of manufacturers, distributors, sellers, and suppliers for injuries caused by defective products.

The three main types of product liability claims are:

  • Manufacturing defects: These defects occur during the manufacturing process and cause the product to be unsafe.
  • Design defects: These defects exist in the design of the product and make it inherently unsafe.
  • Marketing defects: These defects occur when the manufacturer or seller fails to adequately warn consumers about the dangers of the product.

The signs and symptoms of a product liability injury can vary depending on the type of product that caused the injury. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Physical injuries: These could include cuts, bruises, burns, fractures, and other injuries.
  • Property damage: This could include damage to your home, car, or other belongings.
  • Economic losses: These could include lost wages, medical expenses, and other financial losses.

The treatment options for product liability injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to repair injuries that were caused by a defective product.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of product liability injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for a product liability injury if you have been injured due to a defective product. A product liability lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Highland

Areas of Practice in Highland

Cycling Crashes

Proficient in legal services for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' recklessness or unsafe conditions.

Fire Burns

Supplying adept legal help for individuals of grave burn injuries caused by incidents or carelessness.

Hospital Negligence

Providing professional legal services for persons affected by physician malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Items Responsibility

Taking on cases involving defective products, delivering specialist legal support to clients affected by faulty goods.

Senior Neglect

Defending the rights of elders who have been subjected to malpractice in nursing homes environments, ensuring fairness.

Stumble & Tumble Injuries

Skilled in managing tumble accident cases, providing legal representation to persons seeking redress for their suffering.

Infant Wounds

Supplying legal support for families affected by medical incompetence resulting in birth injuries.

Auto Crashes

Accidents: Focused on aiding sufferers of car accidents secure appropriate compensation for damages and impairment.

Scooter Crashes

Focused on providing legal services for bikers involved in bike accidents, ensuring just recovery for traumas.

18-Wheeler Mishap

Offering adept legal assistance for persons involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing fair settlement for losses.

Construction Crashes

Committed to advocating for employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or misconduct.

Head Harms

Focused on offering professional legal assistance for victims suffering from cognitive injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Bite Traumas

Skilled in dealing with cases for individuals who have suffered harms from dog attacks or animal attacks.

Cross-walker Mishaps

Expert in legal representation for joggers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering restitution.

Unwarranted Demise

Fighting for families affected by a wrongful death, delivering sensitive and expert legal guidance to ensure fairness.

Neural Trauma

Specializing in defending patients with paralysis, offering expert legal representation to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440