Construction Site Accident Attorney in Hull

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When seeking legal advice following a construction site accident in Hull, choose Carlson Bier. This expert law firm specializes in personal injury cases and stands as an authoritative voice for justice within the sector of Construction Site Accident Law. With a concrete understanding of state-specific laws, they maintain their commitment to transparent advocacy with utmost confidence while acknowledging the complexities associated with these accidents. Choosing Carlson Bier means choosing unparalleled expertise—a team that tirelessly explores every dimension of your case to ensure maximum compensation under Illinois Law. As dedicated professionals who are unwavering when confronting negligent parties held liable for accidents, they work relentlessly on behalf of clients to resolve matters efficiently and fairly—with no compromise on your best interest or well-being. They pursue accuracy tenaciously because for them, it’s not just about winning cases—it’s about rehabilitating lives distressed by unwarranted mishaps at construction sites too. Trust Carlson Bier if you seek proficient guidance and unique strategic insights emanating from years of successful litigation experience in Construction Site Accident Law across Illinois.

About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in Hull Illinois

Among the vital concerns of the modern workforce, safety at construction sites ranks significantly high. At Carlson Bier, we understand that accidents can happen due to negligence, improper training or faulty equipment on a construction site. As legal professionals experienced in personal injury law based out of Illinois, our goal is to deliver justice and compensation for victims of construction site accidents.

Our comprehensive services cover different facets related to these incidents. This includes mishaps such as scaffolding falls, crane collapses, ladder accidents or any accident caused by defective machinery. We thoroughly investigate each case to gather evidence which aids in weaving together a compelling legal narrative advocating for your rights.

In this spectrum certain elements are key indicators:

* Determining negligence: Establishing who was responsible is crucial in these cases.

* Evaluating liability claims: It involves reviewing worker’s compensation benefits and third-party liability claims.

* Maximizing recovery: This looks into pursuing total damages from loss of wages to future medical costs.

* Assessing punitive damages: These may be applicable if conscious disregard for safety regulations led to the accident.

In unfortunate instances where fatal injuries occur, we also provide aggressive representation for wrongful death lawsuits because at Carlson Bier we believe that families should not bear the burden for someone else’s wrongdoing.

We approach every case with meticulous care and dedication while remaining empathetic towards what you have endured. Our formidable trial attorneys work diligently through all stages from investigation, negotiation up till litigation if required. The reason being simple- Your wellbeing is our priority and ensuring you receive an appropriate settlement is paramount to us.

With substantial experience litigating personal injury cases and mastering nuances unique to Illinois law about worksite mishaps; choosing Carlson Bier assures you professional handling of your case. Alongside successfully obtaining settlements for multiple clients injured at construction sites; our practice embodies the understanding that no two claims are alike because every individual’s circumstance differs considerably.

At Carlson Bier irrespective of whether your claim relates to negligence, workers’ compensation claims, product liability or wrongful death, we strive for justice. Our rich legal proficiency coupled with adopting an individualized approach towards every case ensures that all our clients understand how pivotal they are to us.

Value addition is a critical aspect of the Carlson Bier ethos and therefore our association does not conclude at procuring your settlement but extends towards supporting you navigate your road to recovery. As part of this, we assist in coordinating medical care and counseling resources as recovering from construction site injuries often involves long-term rehabilitation services with potential emotional trauma.

Simultaneously, our commitment is also about alleviating worries regarding associated legal fees since we work on contingency- meaning no fee unless we successfully attain your deserved compensation. This attests once again to how crucial it is for us that each client feels confident knowing their fight for justice is managed by proficient hands without undue monetary pressure while striving to regain normalcy.

Accidents happen when one least expects them and can profoundly disrupt lives leaving victims overwhelmed and uncertain amidst navigating complicated legalities; Carlson Beir assists in unraveling these complexities. While every accident comes saddled with an array of undeniable anxieties like – What if I never fully recover? How will this impact my family’s life?

We insist don’t allow these agonizing worries compound further because help is accessible – Asserting one’s right doesn’t equate confrontation; asserting one’s right means holding parties accountable who’ve compromised safety measures leading to harmful aftermaths.

Click on the button below to explore what your case could potentially be worth allowing us at Carlson Bier assess possible liabilities securing avenues which deserve consideration safeguarding you from lingering injustice consequent to accidents occurred due through someone else’s irresponsibility. Together let’s ensure adherence to Illinois law getting sighted beyond mere punitive damages towards comprehensive claim coverage helping you reclaim control over disrupted life chapters today!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Hull Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Hull

Areas of Practice in Hull

Pedal Cycle Accidents

Dedicated to legal representation for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others' lack of care or perilous conditions.

Thermal Damages

Providing specialist legal assistance for patients of intense burn injuries caused by occurrences or misconduct.

Healthcare Misconduct

Offering professional legal advice for clients affected by physician malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Goods Accountability

Managing cases involving defective products, extending adept legal assistance to individuals affected by defective items.

Elder Malpractice

Representing the rights of elders who have been subjected to malpractice in senior centers environments, ensuring justice.

Slip and Tumble Injuries

Adept in tackling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal advice to clients seeking justice for their harm.

Neonatal Injuries

Providing legal support for households affected by medical incompetence resulting in birth injuries.

Auto Accidents

Incidents: Concentrated on supporting victims of car accidents obtain reasonable settlement for hurts and destruction.

Motorbike Incidents

Committed to providing legal advice for victims involved in scooter accidents, ensuring just recovery for injuries.

Truck Crash

Delivering adept legal representation for victims involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing just claims for damages.

Building Mishaps

Engaged in advocating for workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or negligence.

Cerebral Damages

Dedicated to extending compassionate legal support for individuals suffering from cerebral injuries due to incidents.

Canine Attack Traumas

Expertise in addressing cases for persons who have suffered harms from dog bites or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Mishaps

Committed to legal advocacy for walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering compensation.

Undeserved Loss

Striving for families affected by a wrongful death, offering empathetic and skilled legal assistance to ensure restitution.

Spinal Cord Harm

Dedicated to defending persons with backbone trauma, offering expert legal services to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer