...

Personal Injury Attorney in Hyde Park

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you’re confronted with a personal injury scenario, choosing the right legal representation is crucial to safeguard your rights and interests. Carlson Bier, one of Illinois’ premier law firms specializing in personal injury cases, stands ready to be that pivotal support for you. Our extensive experience in navigating complex liability laws underpins our commitment to securing maximum compensation for clients’ injuries or losses. Whether it’s medical malpractice, catastrophic injuries or wrongful death claims; our team has proven adept at delivering results that count. Partnering with us means receiving diligent case management complemented by empathetic client service throughout the proceedings. As champions of justice and advocates for those wronged due to others’ negligence, Carlson Bier pledges an unwavering dedication towards fighting fervidly on your behalf – because we believe every injured person deserves top-quality legal counsel. At times when doubts about the future prevail upon you after sustaining personal harm; remember: asking help from effective fighters like us wins half the battle! Choose Carlson Bier – where reliable defense meets tenacious pursuit of justice.

About Carlson Bier

Personal Injury Lawyers in Hyde Park Illinois

Strongly committed to advocating for those wronged due to negligence, Carlson Bier is an established personal injury attorney group at the forefront of legal assistance in Illinois. With a wealth of practical experience and comprehensive knowledge inherent in our proficient team, we diligently defend your rights enabling you to navigate confidently within the complex landscape of personal injury law.

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in several facets of personal injury law, setting us apart as dedicated experts capable of directing tailored legal guidance. Our key areas of expertise encompass auto accidents, slip and fall incidents, medical malpractice, workplace injuries, product liability cases and wrongful death claims. We understand that each case has its unique challenges hence; our lawyers meticulously research case-specific facts to present compelling arguments and improve litigation results.

Knowledge is power! Hence educating yourself about personal injury intricacies empowers you when interacting with insurance companies or when resolving claims. One crucial aspect underscoring this domain is negligence – it forms the crux of most tort litigations. As an injured party (‘Plaintiff’), you are required to demonstrate how another party’s (‘Defendant’s’) negligent behavior resulted in harm.

• Duty: You must first establish that the Defendant owed a legal duty towards under circumstances which led to an incident – for example: all drivers have a responsibility not to cause harm to others on the road.

• Breach: After establishing duty, you’ll need proof that Defendant breached said obligation through specific actions or failures.

• Causation: You also need undeniable evidence showing direct correlation between any wrongdoing by defendant causing your sufferings.

• Damages: Lastly there should be tangible demonstrable damages like physical injuries or damage to property directly resulting from the defendant’s breach.

Understanding these pivotal elements equips you with informed perspective and prepares you for intense negotiations against well-resourced adversaries such as insurance companies who often maneuver victims into accepting mundane settlements rather than full deserving compensations.

At Carlson Bier, we underscore the significance of a lawyer-client relationship resting on confidence, trust and professional commitment. We highly regard your concerns about unanticipated legal expenses therefore; all our personal injury cases are undertaken on a contingency fee basis. This means that you pay absolutely nothing unless we secure a financial award for you – essentially making us partners in pursuit of justice where everyone’s best interest lies in obtaining the highest possible settlement or verdict.

Our proactive approach revolves around an in-depth analysis of case details followed by determination of optimal course to advantageously settle your claim. Real value lies not just in compensation but includes rehabilitation services, medical treatments and quality-of-life improvements so victims can start rebuilding their lives as soon as possible.

Remember time is essential! The Statute of Limitations in Illinois mandates filing lawsuits within two years from the date of injury or discovery thereof which further shortens to one year when government entities are involved. Therefore quick initiation helps preserve crucial evidence, ensure all deadlines are met and provides ample preparation time for resisting defense strategies designed to shift blame onto plaintiffs.

Apart from these basics, many other factors come into play constantly influencing outcomes hence solidifying vanilla statements about winning large sums or promising specific results would be misleading. At Carlson Bier instead; we firmly believe that groundwork teamed with uncompromising perseverance lead the way to successful accruals respectful of ethical boundaries set forth by bar associations within jurisdictional limits.

Carving pathways through thickets tangled by system intricacies requires immense skill coupled with relentless motivation – quintessential features defining Carlson Bier ethos – capable transforming adversities into successful milestones along your journey towards veritable relief!

Your potential recovery doesn’t have to remain an enigmatic puzzle any longer! With uncertainty sidelined, find clarity now regarding how much your case might exactly be worth incorporating detailed nuances discerned only by experts! Truly experience value added service as it should be…stop wondering and start knowing NOW – Click on the button below. At Carlson Bier, we believe in turning your pain into purpose by pursuing justice with relentless fervor!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Hyde Park Residents

Links
Legal Blogs
All Attorney Services in Hyde Park

Areas of Practice in Hyde Park

Pedal Cycle Crashes

Proficient in legal representation for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others' recklessness or unsafe conditions.

Thermal Injuries

Giving professional legal help for people of intense burn injuries caused by events or recklessness.

Healthcare Negligence

Providing dedicated legal support for patients affected by healthcare malpractice, including surgical errors.

Merchandise Liability

Addressing cases involving unsafe products, supplying adept legal help to customers affected by harmful products.

Geriatric Malpractice

Protecting the rights of elders who have been subjected to malpractice in care facilities environments, ensuring restitution.

Fall and Tumble Occurrences

Skilled in tackling tumble accident cases, providing legal support to sufferers seeking redress for their injuries.

Neonatal Harms

Extending legal assistance for households affected by medical negligence resulting in newborn injuries.

Auto Collisions

Crashes: Focused on guiding patients of car accidents secure equitable remuneration for wounds and destruction.

Motorcycle Accidents

Expert in providing legal assistance for victims involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring just recovery for harm.

Trucking Crash

Extending adept legal support for individuals involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing just claims for harms.

Construction Mishaps

Engaged in defending laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or irresponsibility.

Brain Damages

Expert in offering specialized legal assistance for clients suffering from cognitive injuries due to negligence.

Canine Attack Traumas

Proficient in dealing with cases for persons who have suffered traumas from puppy bites or beast attacks.

Cross-walker Incidents

Focused on legal advocacy for walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering recovery.

Unwarranted Fatality

Striving for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, extending caring and adept legal assistance to ensure restitution.

Vertebral Trauma

Committed to advocating for clients with spinal cord injuries, offering expert legal support to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer