...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Ingalls Park

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When seeking legal redress after a dog bite incident in Ingalls Park, Carlson Bier is the firm you can trust. Specializing in personal injury cases and with an exceptional track record on dog bite injuries-specific claims, we are the professionals best equipped to support your pursuit of justice and compensation. Our skilled attorneys understand Illinois’ intricate laws regarding such incidents, ensuring comprehensive claim representation for you. At Carlson Bier, we believe it’s not just about winning; it’s about making sure that victims like you are adequately compensated for their trauma. We ardently advocate for our clients’ rights while offering empathetic legal counsel throughout this challenging process – qualities that make us stand out from our competitors. Enlisting our services means engaging committed attorneys who won’t rest until your case is properly resolved. Count on Carlson Bier to provide experienced legal guidance through every step of your dog bite injury claim – because achieving justice matters as much to us as it does to you.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Ingalls Park Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we have a dedicated team of personal injury attorneys who specialize in dog bite cases. Dog attacks can occur at any given moment and they often lead to serious injuries that require extensive medical care. Having represented many victims of dog bites over the years, we understand not only the physical pain but also the emotional trauma that accompanies such an incident.

Dog bite injuries are no small matter. They can lead to severe consequences such as permanent disfigurement, infections like rabies or tetanus, psychological damage including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), massive medical expenses and even time off work due to recovery. In worst-case scenarios, a vicious attack may result in wrongful death.

• Serious lacerations or puncture wounds

• Broken or fractured bones

• Facial injuries leading to scarring

• Nerve damage resulting in loss of sensation

• Psychological trauma

Our goal is to ensure you do not bear these heavy burdens alone but receive the compensation you deserve under laws specific to Illinois state which holds dog owners responsible for their pets’ behavior.

The statute of limitations for filing a case related to personal injuries from a dog bite is two years from the date of the accident in Illinois; it’s essential to act promptly. Proactively taking action will increase your chances of preserving vital evidence and witness accounts necessary for building your case.

Here at Carlson Bier, our proficient lawyers comprehend every facet of this complex process. We start by thoroughly investigating circumstances surrounding your dog-bite incident then gather comprehensive evidence including photos of your injury, medical records, eyewitness testimony, and information on previous aggressive behavior by the same dog if available. Our capable team will also establish whether insurance policies cover the incident — crucial detail because most homeowners and renters’ insurance include liability coverage for dog bites.

Addressing all these components requires diligent dedication coupled with exemplary legal skills—qualities quintessential in our team at Carlson Bier—we strive always remaining committed to ensuring you get the maximum possible compensation, regardless of how complicated your case may be.

Furthermore, depending on specific circumstances of each bite instance—could range from mere negligence on owner’s part to a blatant disregard for leash laws—Illinois state law potentially allows plaintiffs in dog bite personal injury cases to claim punitive damages. This additional form of compensation punishes the defendant for their reckless behavior and discourages other potential violent incidents involving pets.

A noteworthy inclusion stipulates that Illinois adheres strictly to ‘strict liability’ dog-bite laws without a “one-bite rule”. Dog owners cannot excuse themselves by claiming ignorance concerning their pet’s dangerous propensities. Whether the dog displayed aggressive tendencies or not previously doesn’t impact owner’s accountability unless you were trespassing or provoking the canine. Our adept attorneys with intricate grasp of these nuances ensure building a robust and compelling case worthy of notable recompense.

We take pride in our firm’s commitment not only securing financial settlements but also assisting clients navigate tremendous hardships following such traumatic events. Armed with vast experience, compassionate approach towards clients & unyielding perseverance in securing justice we foster solid attorney-client relationships grounded in trust and mutual respect: an aspect surely lacking when battling insurance companies who prioritize profits over people.

Nonetheless, at Carlson Bier being resilient advocates for justice stems from deep within understanding complexities surrounding dog bites related injuries knowing full well stakes involved and consequences borne by victims—we serve as beacon of hope amid chaos guide through legal labyrinth bring closure where there is distress relief where there is pain; we are right beside working tirelessly to ensure rightful compensation rightfully yours become part of restored peace post recovery chapter rewritten life reborn.

Within reach for reliable representation following unsettling episode like a sudden unexpected dog attack—embark journey back to normalcy hand-in-hand seasoned experts unrivaled prowess unmatched dedication bearing burdens together making sure outcome meets satisfactory end; bittersweet victory met tenacious fight worthwhile we strive stand strong on behalf clients tirelessly working in pursuit justice thus ensuring that rights respected, dignity restored and compensation duly awarded.

So, should you consider pursuing a claim for damages due to a dog bite injury, reach out to us. Carlson Bier motivates you towards embarking on the path of recovery ensured by qualified guidance from adept personal injury attorneys with an unwavering devotion to acquiring justice. Let’s determine together what your case is worth—click the button below to initiate consultation. Remember—it’s not just about securing financial settlement but reaffirming faith in judicial proceedings enforcing responsibility where inherently evaded; making right move at right moment before those ticking seconds deflate chances towards potential victory beckoning prospect newfound resurgence awaiting just one decisive act.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Ingalls Park Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Ingalls Park

Areas of Practice in Ingalls Park

Cycling Incidents

Dedicated to legal advocacy for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' carelessness or risky conditions.

Burn Burns

Offering professional legal advice for people of intense burn injuries caused by accidents or carelessness.

Healthcare Negligence

Offering expert legal assistance for persons affected by medical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Items Accountability

Dealing with cases involving faulty products, offering professional legal support to customers affected by harmful products.

Nursing Home Misconduct

Supporting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to misconduct in nursing homes environments, ensuring restitution.

Trip & Slip Incidents

Specialist in tackling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to sufferers seeking redress for their damages.

Neonatal Traumas

Extending legal assistance for kin affected by medical carelessness resulting in childbirth injuries.

Auto Accidents

Incidents: Committed to helping individuals of car accidents gain equitable remuneration for injuries and damages.

Motorcycle Crashes

Dedicated to providing representation for individuals involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring fair compensation for harm.

Big Rig Accident

Offering specialist legal services for individuals involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing adequate claims for harms.

Construction Incidents

Engaged in advocating for employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Cerebral Harms

Dedicated to delivering specialized legal support for victims suffering from cerebral injuries due to incidents.

Dog Attack Injuries

Proficient in addressing cases for persons who have suffered injuries from dog bites or animal attacks.

Pedestrian Incidents

Expert in legal representation for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering claims.

Wrongful Passing

Striving for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, delivering understanding and skilled legal guidance to ensure justice.

Spine Trauma

Committed to supporting persons with paralysis, offering compassionate legal services to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer