Products Liability Attorney in Knoxville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Carlson Bier is a premier Products Liability attorney group that brings its profound understanding of the law to bear in Knoxville, providing unrivaled legal representation. This firm ably navigates the complex landscape of product liability and personal injury litigation. Through an unwavering dedication to justice, Carlson Bier helps victims left reeling from defective products get their lives back on track by fiercely fighting for adequate compensation. In addition to their stellar reputation in Illinois where they are based, Carlson Bier has been consistently recognized for outstanding achievements as Product Liability attorneys nationally with special focus on cases originating from Knoxville – reinforcing their commitment towards this region’s clients. With extensive experience under their belt coupled with expert negotiating skills – ensures your interests are safeguarded against powerful manufacturers or corporate entities disregarding consumer safety measures. Choosing Carlson Bier not only translates into radical advocacy but also expertise that makes all the difference when facing high-stakes product liability claims revolving around defects or inherent risks causing severe injuries or fatalities. Let us relentlessly represent you – choose quality; Choose Carlson Bier- professionally excellent at every turn.

About Carlson Bier

Products Liability Lawyers in Knoxville Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we embody a legacy of experience and commitment in bringing justice to those who have been wronged through personal injuries incurred from defective products. As premier personal injury attorneys based in Illinois, our specialized knowledge and deep legal acuity in product liability cases distinguish us as formidable champions for victim’s rights.

Your case is not just another number to us; it’s an opportunity to redress the harm you’ve suffered and ensure your well-being. Our skilled attorneys understand how distressing it can be dealing with all the complications stemming from faulty products and their implications on your health, finances, employment, and daily life. That’s why at Carlson Bier; we stand ready to fight relentlessly for your rights while ensuring you obtain the maximum compensation entitled under Illinois law.

Delving into Products Liability – an essential area that impacts consumers significantly – this domain centers on the sufficiency of products put forth in the market. This revolves around whether manufacturers or suppliers fail to uphold adequate safety measures and quality control during formation and distribution stages.

Key points of Products Liability include:

• Manufacturing Defects: These are flaws occurring only in the final product due to errors made during production or assembling process, deviating from intended design.

• Design Defects: Pertaining to overarching issues within a product’s design rendering them inherently harmful even when correctly manufactured.

• Labelling Defects: A circumstance where manufacturers fall short in providing adequate instructions or warnings about potential risks associated with using the product.

The implicated party may vary depending upon individual circumstances surrounding each claim. It could range from device designers to part suppliers or distributers included within the entire chain of commerce involved preceding disposition into consumers’ hands

Incurring an injury due to a flawed item can lead one into legal labyrinth unexpected for most people devoid of acquaintance with judicial jargon embedded within Illinois Legislation ruling Product Liability specifically. Fending off mightily established corporations might seem intimidating, however, fear not. At Carlson Bier, we assure you experienced representation throughout every phase of the court process.

Long-standing reputation as distinguished personal injury lawyers within Illinois and along with honed expertise on procuring favorable settlements from Product Liability lawsuits set us a notch above others in law field. Armed with adept investigative skills to thoroughly scan through your circumstances and the exact role faulty items played contributed towards inflicted injuries is part of our rigorous claim formation strategy. Ensuring detailed crashes against opposing defenses champions high success rate before jury or judges; further substantiating our notability at carrying litigation forward.

At the end of this journey, it is essential that you receive deserved compensation to bear medical costs, loss of income during recovery periods and future potential earnings anticipated losing due to lasting effects caused by sustained injuries over life quality & mental stress stemming from such traumatic experiences.

We at Carlson Bier are committed that each client who trusts their representation will obtain top tier legal counsel coupled with highest regard for ethical standing in practice principles planted firmly into firm’s foundation since inception.

Victims suffering unwarranted personal injury deserve justice – full and swift. Let no faulty product manufacturer escape accountability under Illinois law. Trusting your case with us means placing it in capable hands determined on seeking reparation; compassionate about causes fighting together against negligent manufacturers threatening consumer safety amid falling short upholding standard responsibilities entitled to consumers everywhere.

Even if you’re unclear where your situation stands within Products Liability sector or merely even considering pursuing a lawsuit- Fear Not! We offer free consultation services, providing comprehensive evaluations across individual-specific parameters so furnish optimal projection steering onward actions accordingly.

You’ve come far reading this far – why stop now? Find out how Carlson Bier can work towards justice and recovery for you today! Click on the button below right away and discover what exact worth might lay hidden beneath your case waiting unveiled pristine through tailor-cut legal support we stand ready provide embarking uncompromising pursuit towards served justice.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Knoxville Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Product Liability FAQ​

Product liability is the legal responsibility of manufacturers, distributors, sellers, and suppliers for injuries caused by defective products.

The three main types of product liability claims are:

  • Manufacturing defects: These defects occur during the manufacturing process and cause the product to be unsafe.
  • Design defects: These defects exist in the design of the product and make it inherently unsafe.
  • Marketing defects: These defects occur when the manufacturer or seller fails to adequately warn consumers about the dangers of the product.

The signs and symptoms of a product liability injury can vary depending on the type of product that caused the injury. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Physical injuries: These could include cuts, bruises, burns, fractures, and other injuries.
  • Property damage: This could include damage to your home, car, or other belongings.
  • Economic losses: These could include lost wages, medical expenses, and other financial losses.

The treatment options for product liability injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to repair injuries that were caused by a defective product.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of product liability injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for a product liability injury if you have been injured due to a defective product. A product liability lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Knoxville

Areas of Practice in Knoxville

Pedal Cycle Mishaps

Proficient in legal representation for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' lack of care or dangerous conditions.

Scald Traumas

Extending specialist legal services for sufferers of severe burn injuries caused by mishaps or indifference.

Physician Carelessness

Ensuring experienced legal assistance for victims affected by clinical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Commodities Obligation

Taking on cases involving faulty products, offering professional legal support to customers affected by product malfunctions.

Nursing Home Misconduct

Advocating for the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to misconduct in elderly care environments, ensuring compensation.

Slip & Trip Mishaps

Adept in addressing slip and fall accident cases, providing legal advice to persons seeking redress for their damages.

Childbirth Harms

Delivering legal assistance for loved ones affected by medical misconduct resulting in childbirth injuries.

Vehicle Mishaps

Accidents: Devoted to aiding patients of car accidents receive just recompense for harms and losses.

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Committed to providing representation for bikers involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring fair compensation for losses.

Semi Accident

Providing professional legal services for clients involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing rightful claims for injuries.

Construction Accidents

Committed to advocating for employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or recklessness.

Head Harms

Expert in delivering compassionate legal services for patients suffering from brain injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Traumas

Specialized in handling cases for individuals who have suffered injuries from dog bites or beast attacks.

Cross-walker Collisions

Focused on legal support for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering recovery.

Undeserved Loss

Standing up for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, providing caring and skilled legal support to ensure compensation.

Spine Injury

Committed to defending patients with backbone trauma, offering professional legal representation to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer