Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Lake Barrington

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’re in Lake Barrington and have suffered a dog bite injury, reaching out to the accomplished team of attorneys at Carlson Bier is essential. This skilled Illinois-based law firm specializes in personal injury cases notably dog bite incidents, boasting an impressive track record of successful claims. Clients who choose Carlson Bier appreciate top-notch legal guidance that gears towards full compensation for their physical pain, emotional distress, medical bills and lost wages after a harrowing canine attack experience. With meticulous understanding of Illinois’ intricate laws around such injuries – coupled with comprehensive strategies tailor-made for each unique case- they relentlessly fight ensure rights are upheld so justice served swiftly equitable manner. Don’t let the aftermath burden heavier than it already does—time place your trust compassionate competent lawyers at Carlson Bier help navigate this challenging time life ease confidence only true professionals provide! Trust most critical decision hands experts worth making – make way brighter tomorrow by choosing us today!

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Lake Barrington Illinois

If you or a loved one has been the victim of a dog bite, trust in Carlson Bier to represent your case with expertise and compassion. As an esteemed law firm based in Illinois, we specialize in personal injury and are dedicated to securing justice for victims of canine attacks.

Dog bites often lead to severe physical injuries including puncture wounds, fractured bones, and even fatal injuries due to complications such as infection or hemorrhaging. Apart from these immediate effects, victims may also endure long-term psychological trauma like anxiety disorders or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Psychological counseling is often required during recovery.

Key points regarding dog bite cases include:

• Determination of Liability: The responsibility usually rests on the dog’s owner, but might involve other individuals depending on specific circumstances.

• Evidence Collection: Documenting the incident meticulously can strengthen your case significantly. Always take photographs of injuries and surroundings, gather witness testimonies if available, and maintain a record of medical treatments received.

• Recoverable Damages: Not only will you be compensated for medical expenses but also for non-economic damages such as pain & suffering.

Illinois adheres strictly to its “One Bite” rule that holds pet owners accountable even when their pet shows zero prior indication towards aggressive behavior. This includes not just dog bites but any form of canine assault leading to injury. By employing this strict liability statute unique to our state, we endeavor relentlessly on your behalf to obtain compensation which rightfully belongs you.

Recognizing the related financial implications is also crucial here because costs are not merely restricted to hospital bills. These encompass mental health consultation fees, lost earnings due to work absenteeism involved during healing process or diminished earning capacity resultant due extensive rehabilitation period where mobility might be limited/partially incapacitated temporarily/permanently.

Navigating legal processes while recovering from traumatic experiences can be daunting; hence why putting faith in experienced attorney like us becomes vital. Our dedicated team delivers comprehensive legal representation skillfully navigating all complexities inherent within dog bite cases. Every client’s unique legal & health circumstances are thoughtfully considered crafting a tailored strategic approach, thereby maximizing their chances of winning the compensation they rightfully deserve.

At Carlson Bier, our unwavering commitment lies in achieving justice for victims and alleviating some of their distress. We understand that each case is unique, and we meticulously analyze your situation providing bespoke guidance corroborated by years of dealing with personal injury lawsuits, specifically those involving dog bites.

In matters not solely restricted to financial reimbursement but inclusive respect dignity justice as well it’s essential adopt diligent approach when seeking legal redress. Hence at Carlson Bier our mission extends beyond just running successful law firm; instead successfully representing you ensuring justice prevails defines who we are.

Finally, don’t let an unforeseen incident such as a dog bite impede your life any further than it already has. Allow us to take it from here and advocate on your behalf while you focus on recovering physically and emotionally. Connect with us today for a free consultation where you’ll have opportunity discuss specifics about case without fear obligation whatsoever under professional safe space truly empathy understanding shared jointly. Every step way considerate team provides supportive ear reliable refined advice based deep-rooted experience legal field personal injuries–especially those resulting canine attacks.

Curious how much your case may be worth? Your journey towards healing both materially and spiritually starts clicking the button below right away! Take that first stride into world richer opportunities certainty never having worry again whether received rightful due or were short-changed somehow along process – because Carlson Bier always guarantees fair-deal contrive carefully crafted strategies designed meet each individual shine light even darkest times!

Remember: A solution starts with trust – Trust Starts Here at Carlson Bier!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Lake Barrington Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Lake Barrington

Areas of Practice in Lake Barrington

Bike Collisions

Focused on legal advocacy for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others' lack of care or perilous conditions.

Burn Injuries

Supplying professional legal assistance for people of major burn injuries caused by incidents or recklessness.

Hospital Malpractice

Providing expert legal support for clients affected by clinical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Merchandise Fault

Addressing cases involving unsafe products, supplying specialist legal services to consumers affected by defective items.

Elder Abuse

Representing the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to neglect in aged care environments, ensuring justice.

Trip and Tumble Accidents

Specialist in handling tumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to sufferers seeking justice for their losses.

Childbirth Wounds

Offering legal guidance for loved ones affected by medical malpractice resulting in infant injuries.

Automobile Incidents

Incidents: Committed to helping patients of car accidents get fair compensation for harms and destruction.

Bike Crashes

Committed to providing legal services for motorcyclists involved in scooter accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for damages.

Trucking Crash

Delivering professional legal advice for drivers involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for harms.

Construction Site Mishaps

Focused on supporting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or negligence.

Cerebral Impairments

Specializing in ensuring professional legal assistance for patients suffering from brain injuries due to negligence.

Canine Attack Wounds

Expertise in addressing cases for individuals who have suffered harms from K9 assaults or animal assaults.

Pedestrian Crashes

Expert in legal assistance for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering restitution.

Unjust Passing

Fighting for relatives affected by a wrongful death, supplying empathetic and expert legal guidance to ensure redress.

Backbone Damage

Specializing in advocating for patients with paralysis, offering dedicated legal support to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer