...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Lake View

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When facing the complexities of spinal cord injury cases, one requires expert legal support which Carlson Bier excels in offering. Based in Illinois, their seasoned attorneys are well-versed in the intricate details of these often grim and life-altering circumstances. They have a solid track record of ensuring that victims’ rights are upheld and just compensation is secured for medical expenses, pain, suffering and other overwhelming realities that result from spinal cord injuries. Additionally they relentlessly challenge insurance companies who routinely undervalue claims linked to such debilitating conditions.

With Carlson Bier you will receive comprehensive counsel critical to navigating layers of legalese associated with filing lawsuits against negligent parties responsible for your unfortunate condition or trauma. Their understanding approach combined with years-long dedication would optimally guide you through complex proceedings ensuring transparency at every step.

Choosing Carlson Bier means choosing tenacity wrapped in tactful advocacy notably recognized across wider parts of Illinois including Lake View where people remember them as partners for justice during trying times.

In essence: While dealing with Spinal Cord Injuries can unremittingly upturn lives; having skilled attorney by your side could alleviate some stress – it’s not merely about seeking retribution but more so about securing hope amidst despair.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Lake View Illinois

Carlson Bier’s Illinois personal injury attorneys specialize in representing victims of life-altering spinal cord injuries. With decades of experience and expertise, the team works relentlessly to fight for your rights with compassion – recognizing that these types of injuries don’t just affect an individual’s mobility but also compromise emotional well-being.

Understanding the fundamentals of spinal cord injuries is crucial when seeking justice. The spinal cord, a bundle of nerves that sends signals from your brain throughout your body, is fundamental to movement and sensation. However, an injury here can disrupt this communication network leading to partial or even complete paralysis.

The aftermath varies according to two critical aspects- severity and location of the injury. Injuries are categorized as either

• Complete: All nerve connections between the brain and body beneath the point of damage are severed resulting in total loss of feeling and motor function

• Incomplete: Some nerve connections remain intact; thus some motor function or sensation may be retained below the level of injury

Similarly, depending on where along the spine the injury occurs significantly determines which bodily functions will be affected.

Understanding how Spinal Cord Injuries occur – It’s important to recognize however that not every back or neck discomfort qualifies as a spinal cord injury; it becomes classified as such if caused by events such as:

* Car / Motorcycle Accidents

* Pedestrian Accidents

* Slip & Fall Incidents

* Work-related Incidents

Even sports activities or violent confrontations could give rise to such severe traumas.

This scope brings into focus what Carlson Bier stands for – ensuring that victims understand their rightful entitlements under Illinois law and fighting tooth-and-nail against those who may try to undercompensate you.

Life after a Spinal Cord Injury – Rehabilitation, adaptive technologies, psychological support…the journey towards regaining independence post-spinal-cord-injury is long, arduous and expensive. Not only do victims have burgeoning medical bills, but the loss of wages forms a significant impact on finances and offers a grim outlook for the future.

However, Carlson Bier is here to stand with you and battle against the odds. Our experience has taught us that every spinal cord injury case involves not just settling for present concerns but also considering future costs like health care requirements, device improvementsoand any possible complications that can arise from such an injury.

Even though money cannot wholly reverse the damage done, it can help offer some solace through improved financial security and increased access to necessary resources.

To evaluate your situation better and understand what your case entails – click on the button below. Knowing how much your potential claim could be worth in these early stages could save you considerable time and anxiety down the line. With Carlson Bier on your side, rest assured that we’ll use our extensive legal knowledge to fight for your deserving compensation tirelessly.

Advocacy isn’t about false promises; it’s about building trust – which why at Carlson Bier, even as we serve clients statewide across Illinois – integrity is fundamental in our approach. Hence, while our dedicated team extends their service across the state, please bear in mind that specific jurisdictional restrictions apply under Illinois law.

If you or your loved one are facing challenges following a spinal cord injury – do get in touch and let our team guide you towards justice because at Carlson Bier there’s always hope for tomorrow.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Lake View Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Lake View

Areas of Practice in Lake View

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Focused on legal advocacy for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' negligence or risky conditions.

Scald Burns

Giving adept legal assistance for individuals of major burn injuries caused by mishaps or misconduct.

Hospital Malpractice

Providing experienced legal assistance for patients affected by hospital malpractice, including surgical errors.

Commodities Liability

Taking on cases involving dangerous products, extending skilled legal assistance to customers affected by product malfunctions.

Nursing Home Mistreatment

Representing the rights of seniors who have been subjected to neglect in elderly care environments, ensuring restitution.

Tumble & Tumble Incidents

Skilled in handling trip accident cases, providing legal support to individuals seeking justice for their losses.

Infant Damages

Supplying legal guidance for families affected by medical negligence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Automobile Crashes

Mishaps: Concentrated on helping patients of car accidents get appropriate settlement for harms and impairment.

Motorcycle Crashes

Expert in providing representation for bikers involved in scooter accidents, ensuring rightful claims for traumas.

Big Rig Crash

Delivering professional legal services for persons involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing rightful settlement for hurts.

Building Accidents

Committed to defending workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or carelessness.

Cerebral Harms

Specializing in providing dedicated legal assistance for victims suffering from cognitive injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Bite Wounds

Proficient in addressing cases for individuals who have suffered injuries from K9 assaults or creature assaults.

Pedestrian Collisions

Focused on legal representation for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering recovery.

Unwarranted Passing

Advocating for families affected by a wrongful death, offering compassionate and experienced legal guidance to ensure justice.

Backbone Trauma

Specializing in advocating for victims with backbone trauma, offering dedicated legal support to secure justice.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​