Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Leland Grove

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you or a loved one have suffered from a dog bite injury in Leland Grove, Carlson Bier is the premier choice for legal representation. Committed to providing comprehensive counsel focused on your needs, our attorneys specialize in dog bite injuries ensuring maximum compensation and justice. Recognize that each case presents unique challenges and complexities; as such, we approach every client with personalized dedication backed by years of expertise. Indeed, dealings with insurance companies can be overwhelming; our expert team navigates these waters proficiently to secure favorable settlements.Our bench strength extends beyond other law firms due to our practical knowledge of Illinois’s unique laws related to dog bites injuries combined with an unfaltering commitment towards achieving the best results for clients.Counteracting physical setbacks after traumatic events like getting bitten by a dog should not be mired with additional burdens.Leverage the lean yet powerful support system at Carlson Bier who ensures relief through rightful entitlements.Look no further than our unparalleled acumen while seeking legal assistance for any incidents involving serious bodily harm caused by dogs.Trust us fabulously because we are tenacious advocates against negligent canine owners.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Leland Grove Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand how traumatic Dog Bite Injuries can be. These unpredictable incidents can result in significant physical injuries and emotional distress. As a leading personal injury law firm based in Illinois, we are deeply committed to providing paramount legal support and guidance for individuals dealing with the aftermath of such unfortunate situations.

Dog bites affect millions of Americans each year, responsible for a range of severe injuries that could lead to infections if not treated immediately and appropriately. A key component here is understanding your right as a victim of a dog bite incident under Illinois state law:

– You have the right to seek compensation for medical costs incurred.

– You can claim monetary damages for any psychological trauma experienced post the incident.

– Additionally, other losses including lost wages due to inability to work, pain and suffering or long-term disability arising from severe injuries may also qualify for compensation.

It is critical to be aware that your timing has legal implications when you want to file a claim for a dog bite injury. The Illinois statute of limitations typically allows two years from the date of injury to bring forth a lawsuit against the dog owner or handler-in-charge during the incident.

Dog owners have specific responsibilities outlined in The Animal Control Act concerning their pet’s behavior towards people and other animals. Notably, they must ensure their dogs do not run at large unless it is on their property. Furthermore, under this act held within Illinois state law, an owner can be deemed liable if their pet injures another person without provocation especially on public properties or even while lawfully present on private premises including owner’s land.

Our experienced team at Carlson Bier strives diligently in helping victims navigate these intricacies while ensuring they receive fair compensation after suffering from dog bite injuries. Depending on individual case specifics you’re entitled by law among others:

– Coverage of all medical bills connected with the attack.

– Payment/reimbursement for any future surgeries resulting from the injury.

– Compensation for lost earnings if you couldn’t work due to injuries.

Moreover, we professionally tackle this plight by helping victims gather evidence ensuring your claim holds solid ground. This includes collecting relevant medical records, procuring witness statements and photographic evidence necessary for a successful claim. We would also check on insurance perspectives, making sure that the dog owner’s homeowner or renter’s insurance policy covers such accidents.

Education is empowerment; understanding the legal pathways available during such times of distress ensures appropriate action that helps safeguard your resilience and preserves dignity after an unfortunate incident. For any professional guidance pertaining to Illinois Dog Bite Laws and potential compensation claim processes, explore our extensive resources designed around your unique needs at Carlson Bier. We have advocated for countless individuals impacted by these harsh circumstances, guiding them towards securing deserved legal remedies; mark our commitment towards achieving justice for all in their fight against tranquility disruption from untimely incidents like dog bites.

We invite you to empower yourself with knowledge as awareness lays strong foundations for justice. Click on the button below to find out how much your case is worth – understand your rights protected under the law while seeking rightful compensation with us at Carlson Bier – A personal injury advocate group dedicatedly serving in Illinois.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Leland Grove Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Leland Grove

Areas of Practice in Leland Grove

Pedal Cycle Crashes

Dedicated to legal assistance for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' recklessness or perilous conditions.

Flame Injuries

Providing skilled legal services for victims of severe burn injuries caused by mishaps or negligence.

Hospital Incompetence

Providing dedicated legal services for victims affected by healthcare malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Goods Fault

Managing cases involving problematic products, supplying specialist legal help to clients affected by faulty goods.

Senior Neglect

Supporting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to neglect in care facilities environments, ensuring restitution.

Tumble and Slip Occurrences

Specialist in managing tumble accident cases, providing legal advice to individuals seeking restitution for their suffering.

Childbirth Traumas

Providing legal help for loved ones affected by medical negligence resulting in infant injuries.

Automobile Collisions

Collisions: Concentrated on guiding clients of car accidents secure appropriate settlement for hurts and harm.

Bike Incidents

Expert in providing legal services for individuals involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for harm.

Big Rig Mishap

Ensuring experienced legal support for victims involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing adequate claims for damages.

Building Incidents

Focused on advocating for staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or negligence.

Brain Injuries

Focused on extending specialized legal support for victims suffering from brain injuries due to accidents.

Dog Attack Damages

Adept at tackling cases for individuals who have suffered harms from dog attacks or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Accidents

Committed to legal representation for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering claims.

Unwarranted Loss

Working for bereaved affected by a wrongful death, offering compassionate and professional legal representation to ensure compensation.

Backbone Harm

Specializing in assisting patients with vertebral damage, offering expert legal guidance to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer