...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Lincolnshire

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Incurring a dog bite injury can be traumatic, with victims often immersed in physical agony and emotional distress. Amid such turmoil, you need the adept representation offered by Carlson Bier to guide you through this challenging time. Specializing in Dog Bite Injuries litigation, Carlson Bier offers unrivaled expertise across Illinois. Our robust experience is your shield – protecting victim rights while diligently pursuing rightful compensation for medical costs, therapy sessions or lost wages leading from the incident. Understanding the nuances of canine-related legislation empowers us to seek timely justice whilst prioritizing client wellbeing throughout the process. What distinguishes our practice is not just our remarkable success rate but also our unwavering commitment towards every case we undertake in Lincolnshire—standing staunchly beside victims as they rebuild their lives post-injury. Embarking on this quest for justice? Allow Carlson Bier’s expert counsel to negotiate maximum entitlements on your behalf so that you can focus on what really matters: healing and recovery.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Lincolnshire Illinois

At Carlson Bier, your trusted Illinois-based personal injury attorneys, we pride ourselves in our comprehensive knowledge and experience handling various injury cases. One such area of specialization is resolving pertinent issues relating to Dog Bite Injuries – an area that many individuals unfortunately overlook until they are the victim. This complex category of personal injuries involves diverse nuances, which necessitates a keen understanding that only seasoned law professionals can provide.

When it comes to dog bite injuries, many factors come into play; from state laws to insurance policies, liability considerations, and most importantly, understanding your specific case’s distinctive details. To successfully navigate this intricate legal landscape requires experience and expertise – attributes proudly possessed by one of Illinois’ finest firms – Carlson Bier.

Understanding dog bites as a form of Personal Injury is crucial for any potential client:

• The owner’s responsibility: Dog owners have a pivotal role in ensuring their pets behave appropriately around people. In most cases where dog-bite incidents occur, owners may be held liable for negligence if they fail to control their pets adequately.

• Strict liability laws: Some states operate under strict liability laws concerning dog attacks meaning the injured party needs not prove fault – the severe fact that such an incident occurred makes the owner accountable.

• Statute Limitations: There’s a time limit set by each state on how long you can wait before filing a lawsuit after experiencing a dog bite incident. In Illinois that timeline spans two years but it is always recommended to initiate action as soon as possible following such an incident.

Illinois’ leading team at Carlson Bier understands the emotional toll pet-related accidents take on victims, compounding medical bills and other unexpected expenses while dealing with traumatizing experiences.

Consequent medical emergencies arising from these untoward events also escalate costs incurred tremendously making compensation essential:

• Medical Expenses: These encompass ambulance fees, hospital visits, prescription medications therapy sessions associated with physical or mental trauma and follow-up appointments,

• Income Loss: Necessitated time off work due to the injuries sustained from such an incident could result in immediate or even long-term loss of income.

• Emotional Trauma: The psychological distress caused by these incidents is often overlooked but plays a significant role in determining the compensation amount.

We passionately advocate for victims and are committed to making sure our clients receive just compensation, providing invaluable guidance every step of the way. When you retain Carlson Bier, be assured that you have tapped into vast expertise, coupled with dedicated representation determined to fight tirelessly for your personal claims.

Greater challenges present themselves when insurance companies get involved – these corporates employ adept professionals who contest claims vigorously. Their objective? Deny or minimize how much they pay out as settlements. It’s imperative at this juncture to arm oneself with skilled representatives like us capable of standing up against even the most formidable adversaries.

Being bitten by a dog can shake you physically and emotionally. However, beyond physical pain and psychological distress lies another grim reality – legal complexities requiring thorough understanding and robust handling. That’s where we come in. Our team at Carlson Bier cuts through these legal meanders, ensuring that all entitled compensations come your way making recovery smoother.

Different factors affect how much compensation one receives following a dog bite incident including full extent of injuries incurred (physical & emotional), medical expenses associated with treatment and any lost earnings from incapacitation during recovery time; so each case becomes distinctly unique.

By choosing Carlson Bier, you bring onboard proficient abilities molded by years tackling reputable insurance companies while fighting tooth-and-nail for deserving client compensations – Making your voice heard over stubborn opposition until decisive victory ensues!

Wondering what your claim might be worth? Take that critical next step now! Click on the button below to start exploring possibilities tied to your specific case alongside insightful consultations custom-designed around individual intricacies involved. With a wealth of professional advice only a click away, you’ve everything to gain. At Carlson Bier, where your peace of mind is our topmost priority – We champion your cause relentlessly because every client matters.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Lincolnshire Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Lincolnshire

Areas of Practice in Lincolnshire

Bicycle Crashes

Specializing in legal assistance for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' lack of care or unsafe conditions.

Fire Injuries

Supplying specialist legal services for sufferers of grave burn injuries caused by events or carelessness.

Clinical Negligence

Providing experienced legal representation for clients affected by healthcare malpractice, including surgical errors.

Commodities Liability

Dealing with cases involving dangerous products, offering skilled legal help to victims affected by product malfunctions.

Aged Misconduct

Supporting the rights of seniors who have been subjected to abuse in aged care environments, ensuring fairness.

Slip and Stumble Occurrences

Professional in managing tumble accident cases, providing legal services to individuals seeking justice for their harm.

Neonatal Damages

Supplying legal help for households affected by medical malpractice resulting in neonatal injuries.

Automobile Accidents

Incidents: Focused on aiding patients of car accidents receive appropriate recompense for injuries and losses.

Motorcycle Crashes

Specializing in providing representation for individuals involved in bike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for harm.

Big Rig Incident

Offering professional legal services for persons involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing just recompense for hurts.

Building Site Accidents

Focused on defending workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or irresponsibility.

Brain Traumas

Dedicated to providing compassionate legal support for patients suffering from brain injuries due to accidents.

Canine Attack Damages

Skilled in addressing cases for persons who have suffered injuries from puppy bites or animal assaults.

Jogger Accidents

Expert in legal advocacy for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering compensation.

Unjust Passing

Standing up for relatives affected by a wrongful death, providing empathetic and skilled legal support to ensure compensation.

Backbone Impairment

Focused on supporting patients with spine impairments, offering compassionate legal services to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer