Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Long Grove

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When encountering unfortunate incidents such as dog bite injuries in Long Grove, expert legal support is crucial. Carlson Bier offers top-tier legal services focused on this area of personal injury law. With vast experience in handling complex cases and a track record for achieving outstanding results, they are well-equipped to navigate the intricacies of Illinois law when it comes to dog bites and animal attacks. They understand the physical pain, emotional trauma, and financial pressure faced by victims and stand committed to obtaining optimum compensation for medical bills, lost wages, pain & suffering among others through their strategic negotiation or litigation processes if necessary. Serving clients with empathy mixed with assertiveness distinguishes them from other firms – assuring clients not only expert legal advice but also compassionate moral support during these challenging times. To ensure every victim gets justice without any geographical hindrances; Carlson Bier extends services across locations including Long Grove providing in-depth knowledge gained across diverse jurisdictions while strictly adhering to ethical guidelines enforceable within Illinois state limits.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Long Grove Illinois

Dog bite injuries can be severe, traumatic incidents with long-lasting repercussions. Representing those who have fallen victim to such accidents is part of the valued services offered by Carlson Bier, a sterling personal injury law firm based in Illinois. Understanding your options and rights under the local laws can mean the difference between suffering alone and receiving justified compensation for unfortunate occurrences.

Firstly, let’s delve into some essential facts about dog bites. A varying portion of these attacks often result in significant physical harm that may require immediate medical attention or potentially lead to ongoing health issues. These complications may include infections like rabies, fractures, nerve damage and psychological trauma—all leading to extensive medical bills and potential loss of wages due to recovery time off work.

Secondly, understand that not all dog bites are reportable offences in most places; however, this does not hold true for Illinois State as per animal control regulations. When bitten by a dog within state boundaries—irrespective of its breed—it needs to be reported immediately so that proper legal procedures can follow through effectively.

With established experience defending the rights of individuals affected by dog bite injuries across an array of cases—each one unique just as much as it’s pivotal—we at Carlson Bier believe our role goes beyond merely offering legal representation. We aim to provide clients with compassionate support during challenging times while ensuring their interests remain our top priority throughout.”

• In-depth understanding: Our seasoned team will give you a comprehensive breakdown of local regulations alongside Federal laws relevant to your case.

• Extensive investigation: We meticulously assemble every detail surrounding your injury incident—from eye witness accounts down to intricate bits that could strengthen your case.

• Skilled negotiations: Guided by compelling evidence from thorough investigations, we drive toward favorable settlements outside court when possible.

• Aggressive courtroom representation: If settlements do not bear fruit, our resolute attorneys are skilled at articulating strong arguments on behalf of our clients before juries or judges.

The complexity of personal injury law can be daunting, particularly if you’re enduring the physical and emotional strain that typically trails a dog bite injury. But remember, time is of the essence in these instances, as Illinois sets strict timelines within which one has to file a report or lawsuit after experiencing an incident of this nature—a phenomenon termed as Statute of Limitations.

Dog bites are undoubtedly distressing, but staying informed about relevant laws and seeking prompt legal assistance post-injury could significantly impact your healing journey’s entire course. It doesn’t just help secure much-needed financial relief for treatment costs and lost income; it also provides closure so you may commence with rebuilding life confidently following such adversities.

That division between suffering alone and obtaining well-deserved compensation in an unfortunate mishap stands nothing more than active professional legal help—this is where we come into play at Carlson Bier Associates—it’s our pledge to stand by your side throughout this challenging period

As your partner through this strenuous process, we take pride in shedding light on any foggy details surrounding legal pathways while equally protecting the rights bestowed upon you under both State and Federal laws. Our team always goes that extra mile, equipped with seasoned expertise to build robust cases capable of ensuring maximum possible outcomes for clients across different spectrums.

There aren’t any templates here; each case receives personalized attention that addresses respective concerns thoroughly while devising a fitting strategy designed to prevail whether in negotiations or before courts—if necessary. Step into our world today—touch base with one among many at Carlson Bier calling unto anyone dealing unjustly with preventable personal injuries like dog bites.

Wondering what compensation might be due if someone else’s reckless measures led their pet to cause harm? Click on the button below today and obtain insight regarding potential worth attached to your case from top-notch personal injury attorneys who genuinely care about delivering justice.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Long Grove Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Long Grove

Areas of Practice in Long Grove

Pedal Cycle Crashes

Focused on legal assistance for people injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' carelessness or dangerous conditions.

Scald Damages

Extending adept legal support for individuals of intense burn injuries caused by accidents or misconduct.

Hospital Negligence

Offering specialist legal advice for victims affected by hospital malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Goods Accountability

Handling cases involving dangerous products, extending specialist legal help to victims affected by defective items.

Aged Misconduct

Representing the rights of elders who have been subjected to abuse in care facilities environments, ensuring fairness.

Trip and Trip Injuries

Expert in dealing with fall and trip accident cases, providing legal representation to clients seeking restitution for their harm.

Newborn Damages

Delivering legal assistance for loved ones affected by medical misconduct resulting in infant injuries.

Motor Collisions

Crashes: Concentrated on aiding victims of car accidents gain equitable payout for damages and impairment.

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Specializing in providing representation for riders involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring just recovery for traumas.

18-Wheeler Crash

Extending experienced legal support for clients involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing fair recovery for injuries.

Construction Site Collisions

Concentrated on representing employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or negligence.

Neurological Harms

Committed to ensuring dedicated legal support for individuals suffering from neurological injuries due to accidents.

Canine Attack Harms

Proficient in dealing with cases for clients who have suffered traumas from puppy bites or wildlife encounters.

Pedestrian Mishaps

Focused on legal support for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering restitution.

Unjust Loss

Standing up for relatives affected by a wrongful death, offering caring and professional legal representation to ensure redress.

Neural Injury

Dedicated to assisting victims with backbone trauma, offering dedicated legal guidance to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer