FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Manito

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When searching for representation in dog bite injury cases, Carlson Bier stands out as a premier choice within Illinois. This renowned personal injury law firm specialises in dog bite injuries and has an established record of successfully championing the rights of victims involved in these incidents. With unparalleled expertise, Carlson Bier capably addresses common concerns linked to dog bites such as physical pain, emotional distress and hefty medical bills. They comprehensively examine each case’s unique circumstances to ascertain liability and ensure that their clients receive just compensation for their ordeal. Dog owners owe a duty of care towards others; by fighting tirelessly on behalf of its clients throughout Illinois including Manito, Carlson Bier holds them accountable should any harm result from negligent ownership actions. With professional commitment coupled with keen legal acumen consistently showcased through their work, it becomes apparent why selecting those at the top-tier level like Carlson Bier is paramount when faced with intricate matters involving dog bite injuries.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Manito Illinois

Dog bite injuries are a more serious public health issue than you may realize and they can have dramatic effects on a victim’s life. Accidents involving dog bites often lead to physical injuries, emotional trauma, costly medical expenses, and lost wages due to recovery periods. At Carlson Bier, we understand the profound impact of these incidents and extend our expert legal expertise in this field of personal injury law to guide victims through such trying times.

In many instances, determining liability in dog bite cases is not as clear cut as one might think. In Illinois specifically, it resides under the “strict liability” rule regarding canine-led accidents. Simply put: this means that the owner of the dog that caused harm cannot evade responsibility even if they weren’t aware their pet could act aggressively or cause injury. It takes away the necessity for the injured party to prove negligence on part of the pet owner.

However, two vital considerations apply: first is whether or not the injured party was legally allowed where they got bitten at time of incident; secondly whether any sort of provocation from your side led to the attack. Delving deeper into these conditions calls for seasoned understanding and application of Illinois’ Animal Control Act – that’s where we step in!

• Even minor scratches or injuries necessitate swift medical attention.

• Make sure official reports are filed with local animal control agency.

• Gathering witness statements alongside photographic evidence will bolster your case significantly.

Carlson Bier has gained respect throughout Illinois by steadfastly advocating for victims’ compensation rights following such unfortunate occurrences involving pets/dogs. Our primary agenda is ensuring each client receives apt renumeration considering all dimensions – including but not limited to medical costs (past future), psychological counseling if necessary after traumatic experiences like rabies shots along with reconstructive surgery needs etcetera…we employ state-of-the-art reviews & investigations about severity/extent reached out within your given case before pursuing required corrective measures via justice means.

In sum, here’s what you can expect when we take on your case:

• Rigorous investigation to collect all necessary evidence.

• Top-notch negotiation abilities in dealing with insurance companies.

• Skilled preparation and representation if your case goes to court.

Our commitment and dedication speak for themselves through countless successful resolutions benefitting our clientele’s conditions fairly. No two cases of dog bite injuries are identical, hence time spent delving and analyzing each unique matter allows us to craft an effective strategy course ensuring maximum obtainable compensation viable under the Illinois law specificities–that’s why collaboration with Carlson Bier turns out as worthwhile move securing protection+justice for injured victims enduring such intimidation after canine incidents!

We strongly encourage navigating towards getting a professional legal eye over your incident severity because it simply instills better decisions about claiming rightful dues duly deserved after facing distressing dog bites – be prepared before acting hastily which often leads towards undermining substantial long-term influences ahead. Move forward by clicking on the button below; find out how much your case is potentially worth –at Carlson Bier, we patiently stand beside in guiding fundamental justice milestones anchored upon fair & just principles!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Manito Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Manito

Areas of Practice in Manito

Cycling Mishaps

Dedicated to legal representation for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others' indifference or dangerous conditions.

Flame Damages

Giving specialist legal services for people of intense burn injuries caused by events or carelessness.

Medical Carelessness

Providing professional legal services for individuals affected by physician malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Items Responsibility

Addressing cases involving defective products, supplying professional legal guidance to consumers affected by product-related injuries.

Aged Mistreatment

Supporting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to malpractice in senior centers environments, ensuring justice.

Trip & Tumble Incidents

Professional in tackling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal support to victims seeking restitution for their injuries.

Birth Harms

Providing legal help for families affected by medical carelessness resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Incidents

Collisions: Committed to assisting individuals of car accidents receive equitable remuneration for damages and destruction.

Bike Incidents

Focused on providing legal support for individuals involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for losses.

Semi Accident

Extending expert legal support for individuals involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing rightful claims for damages.

Construction Mishaps

Engaged in representing staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or negligence.

Head Damages

Specializing in extending expert legal services for victims suffering from head injuries due to negligence.

K9 Assault Wounds

Specialized in dealing with cases for people who have suffered harms from canine attacks or wildlife encounters.

Cross-walker Accidents

Focused on legal assistance for walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering claims.

Unfair Passing

Striving for families affected by a wrongful death, delivering understanding and expert legal services to ensure redress.

Spine Impairment

Expert in advocating for patients with vertebral damage, offering dedicated legal assistance to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440