...

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Martinsville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you have suffered a dog bite injury in Martinsville, making sense of the legal implications can be daunting. This is where Carlson Bier steps in to support and guide you. A reputable Illinois-based personal injury law firm, we specialize in various types of injury litigation including dog bite injuries. With an unyielding commitment to justice and exceptional legal acumen accumulated over years of practice, our team stands unmatched in their dedication towards ensuring your right to fair compensation is upheld. As astute litigators adeptly managing complex cases related to Dog Bite Injuries, Carlson Bier deploys result-driven strategies that resonate with the unique specifics of these incidents – collating witness testimonies, compiling requisite medical reports and negotiating assertively with insurance companies. We aim for the highest possible settlement or verdict on behalf of our clients injured by rampant dogs while vigilantly upholding all applicable laws within our jurisdictional footprint – because at Carlson Bier, it’s not just about professional representation; it’s about securing your future after a traumatic incident like a vicious dog attack.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Martinsville Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are not just a law firm; we’re your personal injury advocates dedicated to fighting for justice, particularly in the field of dog bite injuries. We understand that suffering such a distressing experience can take a toll on you, both physically and emotionally. That’s why our team of expert personal injury attorneys is ready to stand with you throughout this tough time.

Dog bite-related injuries are often severe and can result in significant medical expenses, permanent disfigurement, or psychological trauma. Illinois’ Statutory Strict Liability clause makes it easier for victims to claim damages as state laws favor them rather than the dog owners. Therefore, holding the owner accountable requires proving that:

• The defendant owned the dog.

• The victim did not provoke the animal.

• The injured party conducted themselves peacefully at relevant times.

The outcome of any case depends heavily upon these aspects which rest ultimately on legal representation quality – where our expertise lies. Our attorneys look at every unique scenario individually, gathering sufficient evidence to build a strong case against culpability while maintaining constant transparency about progress and potential outcomes with clients.

Moreover, dog bites could cause grave diseases like Rabies that might multiply one’s hospital bills or lead to substantial physical distress due to painful treatments necessary for such conditions:

• Antibiotics administered preventively after bites can have side effects

• Wound care including stitches increases emergency room costs

• Vaccinations needed post-bite are costly

These augment an individual’s medical expenditure while simultaneously causing emotional stress resulting from dealing with unpleasant symptoms or procedures. Here at Carlson Bier, providing support beyond purely juridical means is integral to us; representing client interests extends beyond courtrooms onto providing guidance about coping healthily with traumatic aftermaths through appropriate resources.

Notably though under no circumstances suggest instigation on part of victims if they had been trespassing during an incident; provoking dogs intentionally or accidentally doesn’t exempt owners from responsibility barring extreme circumstances. Make sure your attorney is aware of all the minute details of how events unfolded to skillfully navigate liability clauses.

Sometimes, dog bite injuries can lead to severe psychological scarring, particularly in children or those with previous traumatic experiences. In such cases:

• Psychological counseling may be needed.

• Severe phobias could develop.

• PTSD may set in as a result of the incident.

Certainly, not every case will fit into these molds which is why it’s critical to consult an experienced attorney. We at Carlson Bier are committed to placing your need for justice foremost and work tirelessly aiming at maximum compensation encompassing not just medical expenses but also emotional sufferings – because you deserve more than mere recompense for hospital bills; you merit acknowledgment of tolls on wellbeing persisting beyond physical wounds’ healing.

We recognize that nobody deserves suffering from dog bite injuries alone and unequipped. Our firm offers immense wisdom accumulated over years safeguarding victims’ rights punctuated by prowess in litigation paired up strategically with compassionate human touch underscoring every interaction setting us apart uniquely within personal injury legal landscapes.

But we offer more: we want you to find out how much your case might genuinely be worth validating throughout trials endured pain and stress quantifying them towards seeking comprehensive justice enveloped in a rightful financial settlement aiding significantly while rebuilding lives post-trauma. So take a moment to click on the button below – empowering yourself with knowledge about potential restitution magnitude reminding persistently: You’re no victim, rather resilient survivors entitled rightfully towards redress aligned fittingly against inflicted harm severity brought upon unfairly during unprovoked dog attacks steering firmly along pathways navigating towards well-deserved closure.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Martinsville Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Martinsville

Areas of Practice in Martinsville

Bicycle Mishaps

Focused on legal advocacy for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to others's carelessness or hazardous conditions.

Flame Burns

Offering professional legal assistance for sufferers of severe burn injuries caused by mishaps or negligence.

Clinical Negligence

Ensuring experienced legal advice for persons affected by clinical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Products Liability

Managing cases involving unsafe products, supplying skilled legal help to individuals affected by harmful products.

Nursing Home Abuse

Representing the rights of seniors who have been subjected to abuse in senior centers environments, ensuring protection.

Fall & Stumble Occurrences

Expert in addressing trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to sufferers seeking restitution for their injuries.

Birth Traumas

Providing legal guidance for families affected by medical malpractice resulting in birth injuries.

Auto Mishaps

Incidents: Dedicated to guiding sufferers of car accidents obtain fair compensation for wounds and damages.

Scooter Crashes

Expert in providing legal support for individuals involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring justice for losses.

Truck Incident

Extending experienced legal support for individuals involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing fair settlement for harms.

Building Site Crashes

Focused on defending laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or negligence.

Brain Injuries

Expert in delivering expert legal advice for patients suffering from neurological injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Bite Traumas

Adept at addressing cases for clients who have suffered wounds from dog attacks or creature assaults.

Cross-walker Crashes

Focused on legal advocacy for joggers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering damages.

Unfair Fatality

Standing up for relatives affected by a wrongful death, providing compassionate and adept legal services to ensure justice.

Vertebral Damage

Focused on assisting individuals with spine impairments, offering professional legal assistance to secure settlement.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer