FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Mechanicsburg

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When navigating the traumatic after-effects of a dog bite injury, you need a reliable partner to advocate for your rights. Look no further than Carlson Bier for expert legal representation in such cases. With adept knowledge of Illinois law and comprehensive experience handling personal injury claims across the state, our attorneys remain committed to achieving justice for those suffering from animal-inflicted harm. At Carlson Bier, we recognize every case is unique and demands thorough investigation followed by strategic planning. We meticulously scrutinize every detail and robustly represent accident victims ensuring maximum possible compensation is obtained – be it medical costs or emotional distress caused by the incident. Our charming reputation is founded on empathetic consultation coupled with aggressive litigation practices aligning with each client’s best interests. If you’ve experienced a terrifying encounter resulting in a dog bite injury around Mechanicsburg area, trust us at Carlson Bier to fight diligently towards restoring normalcy back into your life through due process of law – because your wellbeing matters!

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Mechanicsburg Illinois

When a dog bite occurs, it can be a frightening experience. Not only is there physical pain and trauma to contend with, but also the emotional distress that such an incident can bring. At Carlson Bier Associates, we specialize in addressing these incidents head-on as a prominent personal injury attorney group based in Illinois. We believe it is vital to educate our clients about the critical aspects of dog bite injuries to empower them with knowledge when they are dealing with such situations.

Dog bites fall under personal injury law because they typically occur due to negligence. This could include not reigning in aggressive dogs properly or failing to warn individuals about a potentially dangerous animal. When you sustain injuries due to someone else’s neglectful actions, you have legal recourse available.

* Negligence: The reality is that some animal owners fail in their duty of care toward others by allowing perilous situations where their pets might harm people.

* Liability: In Illinois, the owner bears potential liability if their pet injures someone regardless of whether the dog showed previous signs of aggression or not.

* Damage Compensation: Victims may claim compensation for medical expenses for initial treatment and follow-up visits, cosmetic surgery if necessary, lost wages during recovery time, property damage if applicable and psychological counseling.

Understanding your rights post-dog-bite-injury goes beyond what’s on paper. It stretches into understanding how traumatic this experience can be and recognizing there may be long-term effects from the ordeal on both health and lifestyle fronts.

As experienced lawyers at Carlson Bier Associates dealing with personal injury cases from across Illinois state borders; we will coordinate diligently with medical professionals so as to better illustrate your case’s overall narrative – especially crucial evidence such as severity of wounds, need for ongoing treatments or surgeries required due rehabilitation.

The next step after enduring a dog bite injury involves establishing proof that the defendant was indeed responsible for damages ensued:

• Proof Of Ownership: Identifying one person who has ownership & control over the aggressive pet can help ensure that whoever’s at fault will be held accountable.

• Medical Documentation: A comprehensive medical record documenting any treatment received after the attack, including prescribed medications and exit reports. This strengthens your claim by providing concrete evidence of injury severity.

• Eye Witnesses: Individuals who were present during the incident can provide critical testimonies as to the event’s detailed unfolding.

Finally, exact municipal codes where you live may lead to other potential violations by said dog owners – like leash laws not correctly followed or registrations past-due. Such elements usually intensify recoverable costs associated with your case.

Carlson Bier Associates stands ready to fight for justice on behalf of victims of dog bite injuries in Illinois. Navigating this complex landscape requires skilled professionals who have a deep understanding of personal injury law dynamics. The claims process is more than just paperwork – it involves compiling an ironclad case through evidence gathering, meticulous legal research, tough negotiation skills, and strategic courtroom advocacy when needed.

To sum up, if you’ve been unfortunate enough to suffer from a dog bite incident due to someone else’s negligence in Illinois, Carlson Bier Associates’ expertise comes into play. Remember every moment counts; don’t let time dilute your rightful claim! Contact us today; our committed team is dedicated to seeing justice served and getting you compensated adequately for your anguish both physically and psychologically presented by this daunting experience.

Now it’s time for action! Click on the button below right away – find out what potential compensation awaits relative to your specific circumstance. Together we’ll create a solid path toward settling claims that fully account for all aspects related damage ensued upon you due to another’s negligence.” Don’t wait any longer; knowledge is power which ensures rights aren’t forfeited undeservingly so join us over at Carlson Bier Associates now!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Mechanicsburg Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Mechanicsburg

Areas of Practice in Mechanicsburg

Cycling Accidents

Proficient in legal representation for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' carelessness or dangerous conditions.

Scald Burns

Providing professional legal assistance for individuals of severe burn injuries caused by occurrences or carelessness.

Physician Carelessness

Offering professional legal support for clients affected by hospital malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Goods Responsibility

Managing cases involving unsafe products, supplying professional legal guidance to customers affected by product-related injuries.

Geriatric Abuse

Protecting the rights of elders who have been subjected to mistreatment in care facilities environments, ensuring protection.

Slip and Trip Accidents

Skilled in tackling trip accident cases, providing legal representation to individuals seeking compensation for their losses.

Neonatal Damages

Offering legal aid for kin affected by medical malpractice resulting in neonatal injuries.

Motor Mishaps

Mishaps: Committed to guiding sufferers of car accidents secure just payout for injuries and destruction.

Motorbike Crashes

Expert in providing legal services for riders involved in scooter accidents, ensuring fair compensation for losses.

18-Wheeler Incident

Offering specialist legal support for persons involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing adequate settlement for harms.

Building Crashes

Committed to representing laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or carelessness.

Cognitive Damages

Expert in delivering professional legal support for individuals suffering from head injuries due to carelessness.

Canine Attack Damages

Specialized in addressing cases for persons who have suffered damages from canine attacks or animal assaults.

Foot-traveler Crashes

Expert in legal assistance for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering damages.

Undeserved Death

Advocating for families affected by a wrongful death, extending empathetic and experienced legal assistance to ensure justice.

Backbone Injury

Committed to defending clients with spinal cord injuries, offering specialized legal assistance to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440