FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Construction Site Accident Attorney in Metamora

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you experience a construction site accident, finding the right legal representation could make all the difference in your case. Carlson Bier is an esteemed personal injury law firm specializing in such accidents and they are dedicated to tirelessly fighting for your rights. Our experts comprehend the unique challenges of Metamora’s construction industry, and have honed our knowledge over countless successful cases ensuring top-notch service. Choosing us guarantees you unrivaled comprehensive understanding of local regulations and safety standards; underpinning efficient claim investigation and solid defense strategies that set winning precedence. As skilled negotiators with extensive courtroom expertise, we navigate through even complex litigations towards just compensations that cover lost wages, medical expenses or long-term loss testamentary to our steadfast client commitment. The dedication we display has made us earn not only respect but also trust from gratified clients across Metamora making impact far beyond their expectations while conforming fully with state advertising stipulations faithfully abiding by all Illinois statutes on professional conduct.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in Metamora Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are a trusted and highly reputable name in the world of personal injury law. Based in Illinois, our firm takes pride in our extreme dedication to each case’s unique nuances.

A significant part of our practice focuses on Construction Site Accidents: a frequently occurring incident which often leaves victims with severe injuries, profound emotional trauma and monetary strain due to lost wages or medical expenses. As industry experts, we believe it is vital to educate you on the significant aspects surrounding construction site accidents.

Construction sites by default have inherent dangers but proper safety measures and rules should be observed at all times – without exception. In spite of such precautions, accidents occur leading to heavy-duty machinery mishaps, falls from great heights or slips due to haphazard cleaning practices. Adherence to detailed safety procedures can prevent such disasters making negligence an important factor contributing towards these grim incidents.

Understanding liability becomes essential because multiple parties can be responsible for construction site accidents. Looking over these bullet points might simplify your understanding:

• Employer – The employer has a duty to provide a safe working environment; not doing so may make them liable if anyone gets injured.

• Equipment Manufacturer – If equipment malfunctions due to design flaws or manufacturing defects; suppliers or manufacturers may bear responsibility.

• Subcontractors – Often employed when executing specialized tasks; any negligence could hold them accountable for causing harm.

In Illinois, workers’ compensation laws limit the ability of workers getting hurt on job premises from suing their employers directly. However, this does not mean there are no other avenues for obtaining just compensation! An experienced team at Carlson Bier will diligently investigate every accident case finding who else might share liability apart from your employer.

We pursue every claim zealously since we understand that financial recovery plays a crucial role helping people rebuild their lives post-accident trauma(s). We vigorously fight hard enabling clients recover maximum compensation thereby covering medical bills as well as loss of income during recovery period(s).

Some aspects we cover while investigating construction site accidents include, but are not limited to:

• Verifying if safety standards were observed at the job site

• Finding out whether equipment was regularly inspected and serviced

• Checking for any lapses in training or supervision

To summarize, cases of Construction Site Accidents can be complex due to involvement of multiple parties and intricacies following state-specific compensation laws. It’s hence prudent to choose a legal representative known for dedication, expertise and tenacity: precisely what Carlson Bier offers!

By retaining our services, you receive personal attention from highly experienced attorneys who’ll keep you informed throughout proceedings. We handle every case as though preparation is necessary for trial meaning ample evidence will always be collected assuring maximum leverage when negotiating settlements.

We understand facing an injury can lead to overwhelming stress and complexity. By partnering with us at Carlson Bier, our prolific combination of empathy, skill-set and hard-hitting representation ensures that your journey towards fair recompense is neither strained nor unnecessarily complicated.

Now that we have shed light on vital points surrounding Construction Site Accidents, why leave matters to chance? Let us help ascertain your position better! Knowledge matched with expert legal counsel from Carlson Bier could truly prove invaluable saving time, reducing distress plus boosting chances of an appropriate settlement.

Explore how we’re poised to assist you further by clicking on the button below – discover true worth of YOUR case today only with Carlson Bier! Our passion lies in helping restore lives disrupted by unfortunate happenings restoring balance duly supported by Illinois law. Here’s hoping this wealth of information makes navigating through phases post-accident smoother than ever!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Metamora Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Metamora

Areas of Practice in Metamora

Cycling Accidents

Dedicated to legal assistance for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to others' recklessness or hazardous conditions.

Thermal Damages

Extending professional legal help for individuals of serious burn injuries caused by mishaps or indifference.

Healthcare Carelessness

Offering experienced legal representation for individuals affected by physician malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Merchandise Liability

Addressing cases involving defective products, supplying professional legal services to consumers affected by defective items.

Elder Abuse

Protecting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to abuse in aged care environments, ensuring restitution.

Stumble and Slip Mishaps

Adept in handling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal services to sufferers seeking justice for their injuries.

Neonatal Traumas

Offering legal assistance for kin affected by medical incompetence resulting in birth injuries.

Car Mishaps

Incidents: Dedicated to aiding individuals of car accidents secure reasonable payout for hurts and damages.

Motorcycle Incidents

Focused on providing legal advice for individuals involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring justice for harm.

Trucking Mishap

Extending specialist legal services for individuals involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing appropriate recompense for harms.

Construction Accidents

Dedicated to assisting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or irresponsibility.

Brain Damages

Committed to ensuring compassionate legal advice for individuals suffering from brain injuries due to misconduct.

Canine Attack Wounds

Specialized in addressing cases for individuals who have suffered damages from dog attacks or creature assaults.

Cross-walker Mishaps

Dedicated to legal advocacy for joggers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering compensation.

Unjust Loss

Fighting for relatives affected by a wrongful death, delivering compassionate and expert legal assistance to ensure fairness.

Neural Impairment

Expert in assisting patients with paralysis, offering professional legal representation to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

Carlson Bier logo – Your Justice Can't Wait
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2025 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​