FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Products Liability Attorney in Minier

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you’ve fallen victim to a defective product resulting in personal injury, it is essential that you find competent legal representation to ensure justice. In Minier and across Illinois, Carlson Bier has proven to be the top choice for Products Liability cases with their swift advocacy and meticulous preparation. The firm’s skilled attorneys have built a reputation of successfully defending clients’ rights against even the toughest adversaries—whether manufacturers or corporate giants—with dedication and tenacity that sets them apart from others. From handling cases related to faulty home appliances, unsafe toys or misleading drug depictions, they never fail in living up their promise: balancing scales of justice for those wronged by irresponsible corporations. Armed with sophisticated experience in products liability law domain as well as comprehensive understanding of local jurisdiction complexities; they work relentlessly towards achieving assets recoveries for injuries sustained due defective manufactured products usage. So when seeking excellence coupled with commitment on your road to restitution; choose Carlson Bier- an undisputed luminary firm in Illinois specializing comprehensively within realm of Products Liability Law”.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Products Liability Lawyers in Minier Illinois

Located in the heart of Illinois, Carlson Bier is an esteemed law firm specializing in personal injury cases with a keen focus on Products Liability. We understand that suffering from a personal injury can be traumatic and life-altering. At Carlson Bier, we aim to ease your distress through vigorous representation and personalized legal counseling.

Products liability refers to the legal liability of manufacturers and sellers for designing, producing, selling, or distributing defective products that caused harm to consumers. Its implication may surface when a product has been unsafely designed, not adequately tested before hitting the market, poorly manufactured resulting in flaws during production or if there are insufficient warnings or instructions accompanying a product.

Our team aspires to assist victims whose lives have been marred by faulty products on multiple fronts:

• Through meticulous investigation into the incident.

• Precise evaluation of your claim against stringent Products Liability laws.

• Formulating robust legal strategies informed by decades of experience in this realm.

• Aggressively advocating for you in court if necessary.

Let us demystify what qualifies as a ‘faulty’ product under Products Liability Laws:

• A defectively Manufactured Product: This indicates that somehow during its construction phase at factory an error occurred causing it to be burdensome rather than beneficial.

• A defectively Designed Product: If there’s something fundamentally unsafe about the entire line of products due to poor design implying all items with similar design could potentially be dangerous despite satisfactory production process

• Failure to provide Adequate Warnings or Instructions: when the potential risks related to usual usage or foreseeable misuse of certain products aren’t sufficiently clarified.

Looking after your rights comes first at Carlson Bier where we understand how daunting navigating through complex legal procedures can seem while coping with physical pain or emotional stress from an accident involving defective items. Our attorneys remain committed towards rendering sound advice throughout proceedings and offering persuasive litigation skills where needed.

Often one might question why it is necessary to have an attorney by your side in these legal confrontations. Here’s why:

• The typical layperson might find legalese and statutes relating to product liability quite complicated.

• To determine whether the harm was indeed caused due to specific product defects and that the involved parties are liable, a thorough investigation is essential which can be time consuming and require expert skills.

• Often for adequate redressal, facing mammoth corporations becomes inevitable. In such scenarios having experienced legal counsel may prove beneficial.

At Carlson Bier we never downplay the emotional turbulence or physical suffering endured by victims or their families. Our resolve remains unflinching – advocating zealously for your rights, fighting tooth and nail within the justice system ensuring you receive rightful compensation.

Above all, being aware of one’s potential claims aids immensely in cushioning oneself from any unjust treatment following personal injury accidents. Therefore, at Carlson Bier we constantly strive to do our part building informed citizens equipped with knowledge about their lawful protections especially those applicable under Products Liability laws.

We cordially invite you to know more about how much your case could potentially fetch you under Illinois law through our carefully designed tool geared towards gauging your potential claim value. Simply click the button below and initiate a process towards getting fairly reimbursed for damages suffered – because at no point should seeking justice add on unnecessary burdens onto any victim’s shoulders.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Minier Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Product Liability FAQ​

Product liability is the legal responsibility of manufacturers, distributors, sellers, and suppliers for injuries caused by defective products.

The three main types of product liability claims are:

  • Manufacturing defects: These defects occur during the manufacturing process and cause the product to be unsafe.
  • Design defects: These defects exist in the design of the product and make it inherently unsafe.
  • Marketing defects: These defects occur when the manufacturer or seller fails to adequately warn consumers about the dangers of the product.

The signs and symptoms of a product liability injury can vary depending on the type of product that caused the injury. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Physical injuries: These could include cuts, bruises, burns, fractures, and other injuries.
  • Property damage: This could include damage to your home, car, or other belongings.
  • Economic losses: These could include lost wages, medical expenses, and other financial losses.

The treatment options for product liability injuries will vary depending on the severity of the injuries. However, some common treatment options include:

  • Surgery: Surgery may be required to repair injuries that were caused by a defective product.
  • Physical therapy: Physical therapy may be required to help patients regain their strength and mobility after suffering an injury.
  • Occupational therapy: Occupational therapy may be required to help patients learn to perform activities of daily living after suffering an injury.
  • Medications: Medications may be required to treat pain and other symptoms of product liability injuries.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit for a product liability injury if you have been injured due to a defective product. A product liability lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Minier

Areas of Practice in Minier

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Expert in legal support for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' recklessness or dangerous conditions.

Burn Traumas

Providing professional legal help for sufferers of major burn injuries caused by mishaps or misconduct.

Medical Carelessness

Providing specialist legal advice for victims affected by hospital malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Commodities Obligation

Managing cases involving problematic products, providing skilled legal guidance to individuals affected by product malfunctions.

Elder Malpractice

Supporting the rights of elders who have been subjected to abuse in aged care environments, ensuring fairness.

Slip and Tumble Occurrences

Expert in tackling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal support to sufferers seeking restitution for their injuries.

Newborn Injuries

Delivering legal support for kin affected by medical negligence resulting in birth injuries.

Car Accidents

Collisions: Concentrated on supporting patients of car accidents get appropriate compensation for harms and damages.

Motorbike Accidents

Dedicated to providing legal advice for riders involved in bike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for losses.

Truck Collision

Delivering expert legal assistance for individuals involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing rightful compensation for injuries.

Building Accidents

Concentrated on assisting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or irresponsibility.

Brain Damages

Committed to extending expert legal assistance for individuals suffering from neurological injuries due to carelessness.

Canine Attack Traumas

Skilled in handling cases for individuals who have suffered traumas from canine attacks or beast attacks.

Pedestrian Collisions

Dedicated to legal advocacy for walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering claims.

Unjust Loss

Working for families affected by a wrongful death, supplying understanding and adept legal guidance to ensure compensation.

Neural Damage

Dedicated to supporting clients with vertebral damage, offering specialized legal services to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440