...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Personal Injury Attorney in Mount Vernon

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Seeking an exemplary Personal Injury attorney in the Mount Vernon vicinity? Your search ends with Carlson Bier. Our team of highly qualified attorneys bring you a wealth of expertise and knowledge, meticulously mastering the pathway to representing your personal injury case. We understand that each case is unique and promises personalized attention to craft effective strategies towards achieving optimum results for our clients. At Carlson Bier, we have proven time again across the state of Illinois that we value our client’s trust above all else. Therefore, when engaging us, be assured that transparency and commitment will be at the heart of every action as we relentlessly pursue justice on your behalf. Delivering desired outcomes while minimizing stress is what sets us apart from others within this realm. Remember – excellence in legal representation lies not just across city or county borders but also with experts who know how best to navigate these waters – those at Carlson Bier are built for this very purpose.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Personal Injury Lawyers in Mount Vernon Illinois

Carlson Bier, your dedicated personal injury attorney group based in Illinois, brings forth a myriad of legal prowess and expertise to identify, educate on, explore and protect your rights in different dimensions of personal injury law. We understand that the aftermath of an accident or unfortunate incident can be overwhelming. That’s precisely why our exceptional lawyers have committed themselves to offering unmatched legal guidance and representation for you every step of the way.

Personal injury cases encompass a variety of scenarios where an individual suffers harm due a negligent act by another entity—whether it’s an individual, corporation, or government agency. Key aspects include physical injuries like those from car accidents, medical malpractice cases or defective product injuries as well as less tangible harm like emotional distress or pain and suffering.

• Car Accidents: These often result from negligence such as drunk driving or reckless behavior causing significant losses – both physical and financial.

• Medical Malpractice: If a healthcare provider fails in their duty towards patient safety standards leading to further complications or death.

• Defective Products: When products fail to function safely under normal usage conditions causing injuries.

At Carlson Bier, we grasp all turns and twists inherent with each unique case acknowledging that no two personal injury cases are alike. Hence our approach is always personalized down to details tailored around achieving the best possible outcomes for you. Countless hours are spent meticulously researching prevailing laws related to specific incidents drawing upon previous precedents while framing strategies effectively designed for successful litigation.

Compensation secured through lawsuits serve to restore victims’ quality of life helping them recover from the severe effects caused by someone else’s negligence; hospital bills, recurring treatment costs—even income loss during recovery periods being few potential areas wherein compensation might apply.

A critical aspect setting us apart is our unwavering commitment towards creating awareness among clients about their rights thereby empowering them with requisite knowledge before making informed decisions regarding possibilities they may not even realize exist. Asserting one’s legal rights following any accident is both essential and time-sensitive. Often, victims are left battling complex legal systems while simultaneously dealing with physical pain, emotional distress and financial troubles.

The team at Carlson Bier comprises professionals adept in comprehending intricacies involved in personal injury cases within Illinois jurisdiction ensuring all facts meticulously compiled and represented to secure the most favorable outcomes. To this end, our dedicated lawyers work relentlessly pursuing justice for each of their clientele standing as pillars of strength when their world seems turned upside down.

It’s also important to dispel certain misconceptions regarding attorney fees associated with personal injury cases. At Carlson Bier we operate on a ‘contingency basis’, which means you don’t pay unless we win your case – that’s our promise to always prioritize your best interest above anything else.

With years of experience and an outstanding track record, Cartlon Bier adds value not just as your agnostic legal consultants but more fundamentally as steadfast allies wholly compassionate about securing justice for the unfairly aggrieved. Our customer testimonials serve testament to the resilience demonstrated by our practitioners consistently winning complex lawsuits ensuring full entitlements were awarded marking successful closures even under daunting adversities.

If you’ve fallen prey to someone else’s negligence or made a victim through no fault of your own, turn towards Carlson Bier where justice isn’t merely sought—it’s served! Remember it’s not just about recovery anymore—with us it’s also about obtaining due acknowledgment reflecting rightfully upon undue suffering endured by you or loved ones in wake thereof. As we tirelessly work serving your interests while shouldering legal burdens—your only priority remains getting back up stronger than before!

The next steps? It starts with an honest conversation determining how much compensation could be due referencing specifics around your case which can be easily initiated here on our website offering seamless connectivity at all times—click below now—the possibility may indeed surprise you…how much is YOUR claim worth!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Mount Vernon Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

All Attorney Services in Mount Vernon

Areas of Practice in Mount Vernon

Two-Wheeler Crashes

Proficient in legal assistance for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' negligence or risky conditions.

Scald Burns

Providing specialist legal advice for individuals of serious burn injuries caused by occurrences or negligence.

Physician Malpractice

Extending specialist legal support for clients affected by hospital malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Commodities Responsibility

Taking on cases involving problematic products, providing skilled legal help to victims affected by defective items.

Geriatric Misconduct

Protecting the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to malpractice in elderly care environments, ensuring justice.

Fall and Trip Incidents

Adept in tackling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to persons seeking restitution for their losses.

Childbirth Damages

Providing legal help for families affected by medical malpractice resulting in neonatal injuries.

Auto Incidents

Accidents: Focused on supporting clients of car accidents obtain equitable remuneration for injuries and damages.

Motorbike Accidents

Specializing in providing legal support for individuals involved in bike accidents, ensuring justice for harm.

Trucking Collision

Providing experienced legal assistance for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing just recompense for injuries.

Construction Site Accidents

Concentrated on representing staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or irresponsibility.

Neurological Damages

Specializing in ensuring expert legal representation for clients suffering from cognitive injuries due to accidents.

Canine Attack Damages

Expertise in addressing cases for victims who have suffered wounds from dog bites or animal attacks.

Foot-traveler Collisions

Specializing in legal representation for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Wrongful Loss

Striving for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, extending empathetic and expert legal services to ensure justice.

Spine Harm

Specializing in advocating for victims with backbone trauma, offering expert legal representation to secure compensation.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​