Construction Site Accident Attorney in Neoga

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with a construction site accident in Neoga, secure the dedicated assistance of Carlson Bier. With proven expertise in Personal Injury Law, our team ensures comprehensive representation—from preparation to court proceedings. We understand the complexity of workplace accidents which often involve numerous parties from project managers to equipment manufacturers. Layered with intricate worker’s compensation and liability laws, these cases demand highly specialized legal support that Carlson Bier can utterly provide.

Our commitment is unyielding—we aim for maximum compensation encompassing lost wages, medical bills, pain and suffering as well as future care costs. Even better? Our track record stands testament: triumphant recoveries for manifold construction accident victims throughout Illinois. This high success rate reinforces our reputation as a leading law firm that doesn’t merely assert but pledges evidence-based arguments proven through years of experience—interpreting laws wisely while professionally navigating delicate situations.

So if you’re seeking exceptional legal defense after encountering an unfortunate event at your worksite—in Neoga or anywhere across Illinois—consider hiring only the best in business—which beyond a doubt—is Carlson Bier!

About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in Neoga Illinois

Welcome to Carlson Bier, your reliable and experienced personal injury attorneys based in Illinois. Our expertise extends into a variety of crucial areas with a significant emphasis on construction site accidents. Navigating the legal complexities that surrounding such incidents can be daunting, but not when you have our seasoned team at your side.

You’ve probably heard stories of workers sustaining impactful injuries on construction sites due to numerous reasons: unsafe working conditions or practices, faulty equipment and machinery, poorly trained staff, and regrettably many more. It’s evident that construction is undeniably one of the most dangerous occupations in the United States, which only highlights how necessary it is for legal provisions to protect these invaluable workers who risk their lives daily.

Should you unfortunately become part of this grim statistic, understand that legally speaking:

• Injuries incurred on job sites are compensable: Personal injury laws were crafted out rightly to hold those accountable for neglecting their duties to provide safe working environments.

• Construction companies owe a duty of care to every worker on-site: This implies that they should have proper safety measures ensured for personnel involved directly or indirectly in work processes.

• Compensation isn’t merely about medical bills: Appropriate compensation covers lost income during recovery periods, permanent disfigurement or disability experienced, as well any emotional distress inflicted.

Here at Carlson Bier Law Group we speak up aggressively against culprits while providing strategic yet empathetic representation for victims because we believe firmly in advocating justice where it’s deserved. Our unrivaled success rate across numerous cases assures clients of our dedication towards holding contravening parties accountable whilst securing maximum settlement values for wrongful actions or negligent behaviors encountered by employees on catastrophic construction sites.

Don’t let an accident jeopardize your livelihood—destruction needn’t dictate your life pattern; reconstruction should. With us as your staunch advocates through life’s stumbling blocks—you dictate terms instead; you own and drive processes unequivocally from a comprehensive legal viewpoint. When your world crumbles around you, count on our team to lay the strongest of foundations facilitating consolidation and recovery, both physically and financially.

In addition to offering strategic insights based on years of practical experience, we also provide individualized attention ensuring no concern goes unheard or unaddressed; that every affected party receives the compassion they need outside courts because here at Carlson Bier Law Group, client satisfaction isn’t merely about winning, but understanding that humans aren’t bargaining chips, regardless how complex or grim situations happen to be.

Insurance companies may not always work in your favor when dealing with compensation claims making it advisable for victims and their loved ones to hire reputable lawyers adept in personal injury law consequently serving as ideal mediators through intimidating legal landscapes assuring significantly higher chances for justice served rightfully.

It all begins with you taking ahead that crucial first step towards rallying back—getting clarity on what your case is worth in the broad spectrum. With value calculated via our skilled professionals many aspects involving potential economic losses (past and future), medical cost estimates (direct /indirect) alongside factoring associated financial struggles linked inherently with such life-altering events are considered exhaustively guaranteeing assured fairness become central issue deciding rightful compensational worth instead being dictated by opposing insurance providers.

Take faith knowingyou’re partnering up with Illinois’ finest personal injury lawyer group providing relentless representation across communities without compromise. Click on our website’s dedicated button right below to find out the credible estimate against your case exclusively valued at by people putting YOU above policies or principles always.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Neoga Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Neoga

Areas of Practice in Neoga

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Dedicated to legal representation for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' indifference or risky conditions.

Flame Wounds

Giving expert legal assistance for people of serious burn injuries caused by events or negligence.

Healthcare Incompetence

Extending expert legal advice for persons affected by physician malpractice, including surgical errors.

Commodities Obligation

Dealing with cases involving problematic products, offering skilled legal support to clients affected by faulty goods.

Nursing Home Mistreatment

Defending the rights of seniors who have been subjected to neglect in care facilities environments, ensuring restitution.

Slip and Trip Incidents

Expert in managing stumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to individuals seeking redress for their injuries.

Birth Wounds

Delivering legal help for relatives affected by medical negligence resulting in neonatal injuries.

Automobile Mishaps

Accidents: Concentrated on guiding victims of car accidents get appropriate payout for hurts and losses.

Scooter Incidents

Committed to providing legal services for riders involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring just recovery for losses.

Big Rig Incident

Ensuring specialist legal advice for individuals involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing rightful recovery for hurts.

Construction Accidents

Committed to representing staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or irresponsibility.

Head Damages

Focused on offering specialized legal services for patients suffering from head injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Damages

Adept at tackling cases for individuals who have suffered injuries from dog attacks or creature assaults.

Foot-traveler Mishaps

Committed to legal advocacy for walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering claims.

Unfair Passing

Standing up for relatives affected by a wrongful death, extending empathetic and expert legal services to ensure justice.

Vertebral Harm

Focused on defending persons with paralysis, offering professional legal support to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer