FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Construction Site Accident Attorney in Oak Grove

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

5-Star Advanced Local Service Ads For Carlson Bier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

In Oak Grove, securing the services of a highly skilled Construction Site Accident attorney is vital. Carlson Bier transcends in providing top-notch legal representation for victims who have met with construction site accidents. Our seasoned attorneys bring to the table years of experience dealing specifically with such unfortunate incidents, and we always maintain an unwavering aim – securing justice and compensation when you need it most. We understand that accidents can occur unexpectedly on construction sites due to various reasons including inadequate safety measures, non-compliance of regulations among others; hence our approach to every case is layered and comprehensive in order to cover all possible angles. At Carlson Bier, we not only focus on obtaining prompt medical attention but also ensure maximum compensation through professional negotiation or trial if necessary for your pain, suffering and lost wages following a Construction Site Accident.

Relying on us means opting for passionate advocates dedicated solely toward asserting your rights effectively within Illinois law sphere while ensuring essential support throughout this trying phase. Let Carlson Bier be your chosen protector during these challenging times.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in Oak Grove Illinois

Construction Site Accidents are an unfortunately common occurrence that can cause significant physical, emotional, and financial damage to those involved. At Carlson Bier, based in Illinois, we understand how devastating these accidents can be for both the workers and their families; hence, our experienced personal injury lawyers vigorously represent clients who have fallen victim to such accidents.

Construction sites inherently pose numerous risks due to the nature of activity being performed. Some of these common hazards include falling from heights or into holes, electrocution or electric shocks, collisions with heavy machinery or vehicles; injuries due to flying debris; cuts and lacerations from sharp objects or materials; exposure to harmful substances leading to respiratory diseases or skin ailments; fatigue-related accidents due to excessively long shifts and even hearing loss due to constant noise pollution. Despite safety measures in place like protective gear and strict protocols, some threats still manage to slip through causing avoidable tragedies.

If you’re wondering whether a case is valid for compensation following a Construction Site Accident – here’s what you need to know:

• Taking Liability: Ordinarily employers bear responsibility. However other parties like machine manufacturers if equipment malfunctions were among causes can also share blame.

• Proving Negligence: If the accident resulted due by failing adherence on established health & safety guidelines then laws permit claiming compensation.

• Statutory Limitations: Illinois law states that lawsuits filed post two years of injury date risk dismissal.

Taking advantage of professional help from knowledgeable attorneys may turn tides in favor when dealing with tricky legal waters surrounding your claim.

Carlson Bier has accumulated extensive experience representing victims disrupted by construction site accidents demonstrating capability navigating complex legal issues attached effectively arguing cases providing requisite tools seek justice rightfully owed damages. We work passionately dedicating effort returning normalcy daily lives impacted parties calculating cost incurred allowing us pursue possible maximum settlement amount on behalf relieving financial burdens incurred future obligations may accrue Time medical expenses wage losses pain suffering associated trauma physical therapy rehabilitation costs future vocational retraining if impairment prevents returning to the same job.

Through comprehensive accident investigations, our team painstakingly uncovers every intricate detail of your case, identifying key witnesses and gathering solid evidence that firmly validates your claim. We concurrently deal with insurance companies on your behalf, ensuring they do not take advantage of complex terminology or legal clauses to unfairly undervalue or refuse compensation.

At Carlson Bier, we are cognizant of unique state-specific laws like the inability to advertise a law office in a city where there is no physical establishment in Illinois. Aware of this regulation’s sensitivity, we wish to clarify that our reputable law firm practices strictly within the confines laid by governance maintaining utmost transparency while briefing clients regarding professional services offered.

If you’ve been unfortunate enough to encounter a Construction Site Accident and its subsequent aftermath – know that legally upheld justice can and should be sought! It may feel overwhelming initially facing intimidating legal proceedings; however remember dealing with them correctly increases chances obtaining rightfully deserved aid easing life burdens post-accident. Allow us accompany journey toward just resolution demonstrating unrivaled advocacy prowess every step way

Finally, knowledge is power – learn what your case might be worth! If you’re interested in discovering how much financial recovery lies potentially within reach for your specific scenario after Construction Site Accident – dare ask question deserve answer Click on button below let us help explore financial compensation avenues available You’ll receive personalized evaluation details pertaining case cost exact monetary figure available seek through litigation Don’t wonder any longer Click find out deserves justice served right Just one click could make considerable difference cases outcome Begin exploration now.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Oak Grove Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Oak Grove

Areas of Practice in Oak Grove

Bicycle Mishaps

Specializing in legal support for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others' lack of care or unsafe conditions.

Burn Injuries

Offering expert legal help for sufferers of serious burn injuries caused by accidents or negligence.

Clinical Misconduct

Providing professional legal services for patients affected by clinical malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Items Obligation

Handling cases involving defective products, offering professional legal guidance to consumers affected by faulty goods.

Elder Mistreatment

Defending the rights of seniors who have been subjected to mistreatment in aged care environments, ensuring restitution.

Fall and Trip Injuries

Adept in handling stumble accident cases, providing legal representation to individuals seeking restitution for their losses.

Infant Injuries

Providing legal help for families affected by medical misconduct resulting in childbirth injuries.

Motor Incidents

Incidents: Devoted to helping individuals of car accidents receive just recompense for hurts and damages.

Two-Wheeler Mishaps

Expert in providing legal support for individuals involved in bike accidents, ensuring justice for injuries.

Trucking Incident

Offering experienced legal assistance for victims involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing adequate claims for hurts.

Construction Site Collisions

Concentrated on assisting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or irresponsibility.

Head Injuries

Expert in extending professional legal support for victims suffering from cognitive injuries due to carelessness.

K9 Assault Injuries

Proficient in handling cases for persons who have suffered injuries from dog attacks or beast attacks.

Foot-traveler Crashes

Expert in legal representation for joggers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering restitution.

Unfair Passing

Advocating for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, offering understanding and skilled legal representation to ensure justice.

Backbone Injury

Expert in representing patients with spine impairments, offering specialized legal guidance to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440