...
FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.313.2440
Facebook-f Linkedin Google

Car Accident Attorney in Okawville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Suffered from an unfortunate car accident in Okawville? You need the best legal representation to get through this challenging phase. That’s where Carlson Bier, a proven personal injury law firm, comes into play. With extensive experience and specialized knowledge in Illinois’ vehicular accident laws, our dedicated legal team has been serving clients for years with unwavering commitment and exceptional results. At Carlson Bier, we prioritize your well-being by striving relentlessly to secure maximum compensation for any damages or injuries you’ve sustained during your automobile mishap. Our demonstrated history of success underscores our capacity to handle complex cases proficiently – firmly establishing us as a reliable advocate during the most trying times of your life. Trusting us means investing in proven expertise and comprehensive support tailored meticulously according to individual client needs – everything necessary for successful case resolution effectively winning favorable settlements or verdicts for you post-accident trauma recovery process! Choose Carlson Bier – choose efficiency, experience & empathetic care when navigating through these challenging situations.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Car Accident Lawyers in Okawville Illinois

Venturing into the daunting world of personal injury law can be overwhelming for most, especially in the aftermath of a car accident. This is where Carlson Bier bridges the gap with a dedicated team of proficient personal injury attorneys well-versed in the law terrain of Illinois. When dealing with motor vehicle accidents, it’s crucial to recognize that they are often wrought with complexity born from various potential factors. From careless driving and failure to adhere to traffic laws to mechanical issues within vehicles themselves, these factors create multi-faceted legal challenges requiring expert solutions.

With a unyielding commitment towards shieldinging your rights, Carlson Bier delves deep into each case— deploying shrewd litigation strategies tailored specifically around your needs and guided by seasoned knowledge of local regulations. They work assiduously to advocate on behalf of their clients using fact-based evidence.

Understanding what exactly happens after you’ve been involved in an automobile collision remains pivotal for navigating this process effectively. To bolster comprehension:

• It’s essential first to document comprehensive records including photos and witnesses’ testimonies.

• Notifying both your insurer as well as hiring a competent attorney merit immediate attention—Carlson Bier brings formidable representation capable of effectively combating any counter-claims.

• Medical treatments post-incident need not only immediate tending but also methodical documentation proactively maintaining a meticulous paper trail potentially invaluable for future reference.

• Lastly, protecting oneself legally fundamentally involves abstaining from admitting fault prior to consultation or settlement negotiations—a misstep Carlson Bier safeguards its clientele against.

Appreciating how insurance processes function offers further empowerment when dealing with an auto-related incident’s legal recourse. Settlement claims typically revolve around damages incurred: including medical bills, lost earnings due potentially impeded work capabilities, while considering pain and suffering extended into victims’ lives on physical or emotional grounds causing lifestyle disruption long-term.

Upon pursuing lawsuit filing there lies a two-year time frame referred commonly as Statute of Limitations—an essential detail signaling urgency for swift action ensuring that fighter remains in your corner throughout this daunting journey. Furthermore, Carlson Bier attorneys take care to explain the concept of ‘comparative negligence’, a unique clause within Illinois law stipulating shared blame and consequently influence upon settlement amounts rewarded.

Knowing pivotal legal processes including pre-trial discoveries, mediation or an eventual trial itself is crucial—and it is exactly what our team aims at—delivering you tailored advice based on years of experience and expertise. Carlson Bier can assist you to comprehend the complexity of these procedures, make sense of them and equip you with empowering knowledge enough to steer your personal injury lawsuit towards a winning conclusion.

The difference between merely dealing with aftermath versus capitalizing on justified compensation lies fundamentally in choice: battling alone or electing a dedicated arsenal like Carlson Bier fighting tooth-and-nail defending deserving justice for each client. Propel yourself towards making an informed decision – educating yourself about car accident intricacies coupled with seasoned representation undeniably maximizes outcomes favoring recovery both medically and financially.

With all that said, understanding your specific case’s worth proves invaluable—click below now discovering how much solidly invested representation from one of Illinois’ leading firms such as Carlson Bier potentially garners for you.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Okawville Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Car Accident FAQ​

The most common causes of car accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause drivers to lose control of their vehicles.
  • Vehicle defects: Defective vehicles can cause accidents in a variety of ways.
  • Weather conditions: Rain, snow, and ice can make roads slick and dangerous.

If you are involved in a car accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a car accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a car accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a car accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

In a car accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

    Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your vehicle.

    Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for car accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Okawville

Areas of Practice in Okawville

Pedal Cycle Crashes

Proficient in legal support for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others's recklessness or risky conditions.

Flame Burns

Giving expert legal support for individuals of grave burn injuries caused by accidents or recklessness.

Physician Malpractice

Offering specialist legal representation for clients affected by physician malpractice, including surgical errors.

Merchandise Accountability

Handling cases involving faulty products, offering professional legal assistance to victims affected by faulty goods.

Nursing Home Neglect

Defending the rights of nursing home residents who have been subjected to misconduct in senior centers environments, ensuring justice.

Slip and Stumble Injuries

Expert in addressing stumble accident cases, providing legal support to persons seeking compensation for their suffering.

Childbirth Wounds

Extending legal guidance for households affected by medical carelessness resulting in infant injuries.

Car Accidents

Crashes: Dedicated to helping sufferers of car accidents obtain appropriate remuneration for harms and damages.

Scooter Mishaps

Committed to providing representation for bikers involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring just recovery for traumas.

18-Wheeler Accident

Extending professional legal advice for individuals involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing just recompense for harms.

Construction Mishaps

Committed to supporting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or recklessness.

Head Damages

Dedicated to extending professional legal representation for victims suffering from cognitive injuries due to misconduct.

Canine Attack Wounds

Proficient in tackling cases for persons who have suffered traumas from puppy bites or beast attacks.

Pedestrian Accidents

Expert in legal support for joggers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering claims.

Unjust Death

Working for families affected by a wrongful death, offering empathetic and skilled legal guidance to ensure fairness.

Backbone Injury

Expert in advocating for patients with backbone trauma, offering compassionate legal representation to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.313.2440

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​