...

Motorcycle Accident Attorney in Phoenix

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you experience a motorcycle accident in Phoenix, immediately seeking legal assistance from Carlson Bier can make all the difference. Our experienced attorneys handle each case with dedication and precision, foreseeing common pitfalls to ensure maximum compensation for your loss. Motorcycle accidents can be life-threatening with significant financial impacts, but our skilled lawyers work relentlessly to alleviate that burden off your shoulders. We comprehend the challenging elements of personal injury cases; thus, we navigate through complexities confidently, preserving and defending your rights throughout the process. Whether it’s negotiating settlements or advocating in courtrooms, Carlson Bier stands fearless on behalf of their clients’ interests because we believe a rider deserves justice too! Remember: Time is crucial after an accident; contact us at once to help uphold any applicable statutes of limitations for filing claims related to personal injuries or damage recoveries. Trust Carlson Bier as an ally during these demanding times—we aim not just for closure but vindication too!

About Carlson Bier

Motorcycle Accident Lawyers in Phoenix Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand the complexities and stress that can arise following a motorcycle accident. With our excellent team of personal injury attorneys based in Illinois, our aim is to guide you through this challenging time with utmost professionalism and efficiency. We bring an immense value by providing comprehensive legal advice backed by years of experience in this field.

Motorcycle accidents can result in severe physical injuries, emotional distress, loss of wages, or even wrongful death. When such a mishap occurs due to the negligence of another party, it’s critical to seek proper legal assistance immediately. The law provides avenues for those injured in these scenarios to be compensated for their losses; however navigating these channels requires expert knowledge.

Here at Carlson Bier, we specialize in tackling personal injury lawsuits related directly to motorcycle accidents by:

• Initial Case Evaluation: Our experienced legal team is formidable at evaluating your case’s strength based on facts and evidence presented during your consultation.

• Damage Assessment: We make detailed analyses of incurred damages including medical bills, property damage repair costs and overall impact on quality of life.

• Court Representation: If your case does go to court, our proficient litigators employ their courtroom skills effectively representing you.

• Negotiation & Settlement Advocacy: Our firm understands the tactics insurance companies may use when addressing claims meaning we advocate professionally for fair settlements based upon investigative findings.

Understanding what constitutes a “negligent” act can be difficult. Broadly speaking though – Any action taken without reasonable consideration resulting in somebody’s harm could indeed qualify as negligence and provide grounds for legal redress. These negligent acts typically tend to stem from other drivers’ actions like reckless driving habits or not obeying traffic laws but laying blame isn’t limited there exclusively either. Potentially liable parties include government agencies responsible for road maintenance or even manufacturers producing faulty bike parts causing such unfortunate incidents.

Post-accident procedures are crucially important too as they form foundational building blocks supporting your claim. Recording accident scenes by taking photos or videos, seeking immediate medical attention even for minor injuries (that’ll serve as important evidential proof further down the line), gathering witness information, reporting accidents to police and insurance providers – all this done diligently would greatly strengthen your case’s standing providing maximum leverage possible.

At Carlson Bier, we essentially are committed to helping our clients recover what rightfully belongs to them following serious motorcycle accidents. It’s of utmost importance to us that you get the chance of obtaining compensation you deserve thus allowing easier transitions to life after such unforeseen mishaps.

Litigating any personal injury claim requires expertise and at times, exhausting persistence which is exactly where we step in. Our mission right from word go is always about kindling a stress-free experience for you throughout these litigation processes while ensuring that your rights remain protected every step along the way too.

While fighting for deserved settlements/reparations post motorcycle accidents could indeed be daunting yet extremely crucial; finding top-notch legal representation well versed in local Illinois laws championing your cause effectively thereby becomes just as (if not more) important. At Carlson Bier, trust that our expert Illinois-based attorneys would help guide through complexities ensuring best possible outcomes aligning with rightful justice served on all fronts!

We invite you now to take advantage of our offer below; click on it! That’d render a comprehensive estimate regarding just how much your case could potentially be worth thus setting specific expectations straight right at outset: Get started today with Carlson-Bier!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Phoenix Residents

Links
Legal Blogs
All Attorney Services in Phoenix

Areas of Practice in Phoenix

Pedal Cycle Incidents

Expert in legal support for victims injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' recklessness or perilous conditions.

Thermal Injuries

Supplying skilled legal assistance for patients of serious burn injuries caused by mishaps or negligence.

Clinical Misconduct

Ensuring experienced legal services for individuals affected by healthcare malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Merchandise Fault

Dealing with cases involving dangerous products, extending adept legal guidance to individuals affected by harmful products.

Aged Abuse

Protecting the rights of elders who have been subjected to neglect in senior centers environments, ensuring justice.

Slip and Slip Occurrences

Expert in handling trip accident cases, providing legal support to clients seeking redress for their harm.

Neonatal Injuries

Extending legal guidance for loved ones affected by medical negligence resulting in newborn injuries.

Auto Crashes

Incidents: Devoted to supporting sufferers of car accidents get equitable settlement for injuries and harm.

Two-Wheeler Incidents

Specializing in providing legal services for victims involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for injuries.

Trucking Incident

Offering expert legal representation for individuals involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing fair recovery for hurts.

Construction Crashes

Engaged in assisting staff or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or carelessness.

Cognitive Impairments

Specializing in extending specialized legal assistance for clients suffering from cerebral injuries due to accidents.

K9 Assault Wounds

Adept at managing cases for victims who have suffered wounds from dog bites or animal attacks.

Pedestrian Incidents

Focused on legal advocacy for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering damages.

Unwarranted Demise

Striving for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, supplying compassionate and professional legal guidance to ensure justice.

Spine Trauma

Dedicated to advocating for clients with backbone trauma, offering professional legal support to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer