FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Pierron

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Carlson Bier Reviews And Ratings 5 Stars Google Reviews - Best Personal Injury Law Firm In Chicago
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’ve experienced a dog bite injury in Pierron, count on Carlson Bier to deliver the legal representation you deserve. Throughout our storied history as staunch personal injury attorneys, we’ve achieved significant success handling such cases and securing fair compensation for injuries sustained. At Carlson Bier, we understand that a dog bite can lead to serious physical harm or emotional trauma – it’s not something anyone should endure alone or uncompensated. Our dedicated team expertly navigates Illinois’ complex laws relating to canine aggression and liability of pet owners. We meticulously gather all necessary evidence while exploring every viable avenue towards ensuring justice is served for you effectively and efficiently. It’s important your rights are secured when faced with the medical costs, loss of wages and potential lifestyle changes intertwined with these painful incidents. Choosing Carlson Bier means gaining steadfast champions committed to your cause— skillfully fighting at every step until the outcome rightfully favors you – wherever in Illinois it may be required; because encasing this fight within IIIinois borders makes us stronger together.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Pierron Illinois

Get the legal support you need with Carlson Bier, an adept law firm specialized in personal injury cases and proudly serving Illinois residents. Our trusted Personal Injury Lawyers boast successful experience in a critical area of their practice, Dog Bite Injuries. It’s a known fact that untoward incidents involving dog bites can shuffle from mild to severe quickly; hence knowing your rights is paramount.

Dog bites are unforeseen events capable of yielding grave ramifications such as puncture wounds, fractures, infection risks, disfigurement or scarring and in extreme cases, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The expenses incurred for treatments can rack up considerable costs truly amplifying the urgency for adept legal guidance. Here at Carlson Bier, we understand this complexity like no one else and commit ourselves to ensure you gain rightful compensation for your suffering.

Dog bite injuries hinge on several interwoven aspects – liability determination being crucial among them. In Illinois, according to ‘The Code of Civil Procedure 735 ILCS 5/2-1702’, if a pet owner’s negligence resulted in injury caused by the animal attack to include dog bites; they may be held liable regardless of whether or not the owner knew about any potential dangers presented by their pet’s breed beforehand.

Key statutes regarding Illinois state laws:

• It adopts strict liability rule wherein owners are responsible even in the event where a dog had never previously exhibited signs of aggression.

• A two-year timeframe is assigned standardly via statute of limitations for filing lawsuits involved with personal injury from a dog bite incident.

Given these legal parameters’ intricacies surrounding Dog Bite Injuries; it becomes provenly imperative to avail professional attorney services versed well within this domain. At Carlson Bier we aim at lightening this overbearing load offering comprehensive insights and top-notch representation ensuring fairness prevails vis-a-vis intent but also undue compensation sought by insurance companies.

It’s significant noting however that deciphering key legal steps including onus verification, damage assessment and due compensation claiming involves exhaustive advocacy. Our skilled attorneys at Carlson Bier apply profound expertise in dog bite cases to potentially evaluate all underlying levels involving liability identification, establishing extent of physical/emotional harm endured assessing medical treatment costs both current & projected future bills, pain and suffering experienced for holistic reparation.

Trust our dedicated personal injury team who will work relentlessly understanding each case’s unique trajectory pursuing the utmost favorable outcome using strategized negotiation skills and potential court proceedings if necessary. We champion your rights offering unflinching commitment navigating through this challenging journey prioritizing your well-being and desired justice closure above all.

Given that Carlson Bier holds your best interests at heart and emphasizes transparency, it’s important to clarify that we abide by Illinois law; hence we do not have a physical office in Pierron nor claim representation there.

Now comes the most crucial part – determining how much compensation you may be entitled to. Each case has its own unique circumstances like severity of injuries resulting from a dog attack etc., which means case worth can vary dramatically. This becomes an overwhelming process where you must battle insurance companies with crafty lowball tactics emphasizing more why retaining proficient legal guidance from seasoned professionals plays a vital role.

Our aim while handling such claims is putting Wilmington individuals first above all helping them tackle these stressful times capturing rightful monetary benefits they deserve as victims of Dog Bite Injuries. If you’ve been bitten or attacked by a dog, rely on Carlson Bier’s exceptional team who make relentless efforts getting their clients what they are rightly owing without exception.

Remember, time is of essence so take control today thereby enabling us to initiate early assessments granting maximized chances towards securing due settlement favourable in terms comprehensively covering costs on medical bills, lost income (present/future), rehabilitation or disability adjustments not forgetting pain and emotional trauma inflicted because of such unfortunate incidents.

We keenly invite you now! Click on the button below to find out just what your case is worth. A compassionate team member from Carlson Bier will reach out shortly ready to discuss how we may help make a difference in this difficult time navigating you confidently towards justice asides our unyielding commitment ensuring safe recovery meanwhile taking charge so that you can focus right back on getting better, stronger. We’re here by your side, reach out today and let’s begin this journey together towards a just resolution!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Pierron Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Pierron

Areas of Practice in Pierron

Bicycle Accidents

Expert in legal services for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' carelessness or dangerous conditions.

Burn Wounds

Extending expert legal assistance for sufferers of major burn injuries caused by mishaps or indifference.

Hospital Misconduct

Offering experienced legal services for persons affected by hospital malpractice, including surgical errors.

Merchandise Liability

Taking on cases involving unsafe products, delivering skilled legal help to individuals affected by faulty goods.

Geriatric Misconduct

Advocating for the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to neglect in elderly care environments, ensuring restitution.

Slip & Trip Accidents

Specialist in managing trip accident cases, providing legal services to sufferers seeking restitution for their losses.

Newborn Harms

Supplying legal guidance for relatives affected by medical incompetence resulting in birth injuries.

Vehicle Accidents

Collisions: Concentrated on supporting sufferers of car accidents gain reasonable payout for injuries and damages.

Bike Accidents

Specializing in providing legal support for motorcyclists involved in bike accidents, ensuring justice for damages.

Semi Accident

Offering specialist legal assistance for clients involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing appropriate compensation for injuries.

Construction Site Crashes

Engaged in defending workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or negligence.

Head Traumas

Dedicated to providing specialized legal support for clients suffering from brain injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Harms

Proficient in managing cases for clients who have suffered injuries from dog attacks or beast attacks.

Cross-walker Crashes

Specializing in legal assistance for joggers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering restitution.

Wrongful Fatality

Standing up for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, delivering compassionate and skilled legal representation to ensure compensation.

Spinal Cord Harm

Expert in advocating for victims with spine impairments, offering expert legal guidance to secure redress.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440