...

Personal Injury Attorney in Plainfield

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When facing personal injury challenges, Carlson Bier is the premier choice to safeguard your rights in Plainfield. Our legal team has proven experience and exceptional knowledge in handling a wide range of personal injury cases, including auto accidents, medical malpractice, dog bites, workplace injuries, and wrongful death lawsuits. We understand that these incidents can be life-altering, which is why we provide assertive legal representation, fiercely advocating for maximum compensation on your behalf. Distinguished by IPSO (Illinois Personal Injury Service Office), Carlson Bier’s history of successful plaintiff verdicts underscores our commitment to justice for every client we represent. Choosing us not only secures the best possible outcome but also relieves you from extensive court procedures as we manage your case comprehensively at all stages of litigation until a favorable resolution is achieved. At Carlson Bier, your case will never be ‘just another number’; it receives the personalized attention it deserves. Trust us for steadfast advocacy in Plainfield.

About Carlson Bier

Personal Injury Lawyers in Plainfield Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are more than just a legal firm; we’re your trusted advocates in matters of personal injury law. Personal injury cases involve individuals who have suffered physical or emotional injuries due to the negligent actions of another party. If you’ve been injured in an accident caused by someone else’s carelessness, it’s crucial to seek immediate legal help from experienced personal injury attorneys like us.

Why should you consider pursuing a personal injury lawsuit? Firstly, these lawsuits hold at-fault parties accountable for their reckless behavior. Secondly, they ensure victims obtain full and fair compensation for all accident-related expenses, including medical bills, lost wages, pain and suffering, and other losses incurred.

Dedicated solely to representing the interests of those harmed by another’s negligence, our Illinois-based personal injury attorneys bring expertise and deep understanding to every case they handle. Here’s what sets us apart:

  • Comprehensive Case Evaluation: We understand that each case is unique and requires personalized attention, regardless of its nature.
  • Superior Negotiation Skills: Our lawyers possess superior negotiation skills, aiming for maximum benefits in both settlements and litigation.
  • Contingency-Based Representation: We only charge attorney fees when we win a settlement for you or secure a favorable verdict in court.
  • Quality Legal Counsel: Guided by values like compassion, integrity, and professionalism.

A key aspect that distinguishes us from others is our commitment to educating our clients about their rights and setting realistic expectations from the outset. It’s important to note that Illinois implements comparative fault laws, meaning if you’ve contributed even slightly to causing your injuries, this could reduce the total amount recovered through trial or settlement. However, recovery is not entirely barred if you are found less than 51% at fault!

We constantly seek to improve our strategies, aligning with our objective of bringing significant value to those relying on us for personal injury cases. Our lawyers will guide you through determining negligence, dealing with insurance adjusters, and ensuring that all your questions are answered.

Seeking legal representation after an accident can be intimidating. At Carlson Bier in Illinois, we prioritize simplifying this process by providing top-notch customer service and efficient legal advice, so you can focus on recovery without added stress.

In personal injury cases, no two situations are alike, making it important to get a professional assessment of your specific case’s potential worth. Should you choose us as your trusted advocacy partners, rest assured that we’ll leave no stone unturned in seeking maximum compensation for all damages incurred due to someone else’s negligence.

So why wait? Connect with our team today to craft solid arguments backed by evidence! Get informed about how much your case could potentially be worth. It all begins here—click the button below to discover the potential value of your claim. Remember: Time is critical in personal injury cases. The sooner you act, the better your chances of receiving full justice and fair compensation.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Plainfield Residents

Links
Legal Blogs
All Attorney Services in Plainfield

Areas of Practice in Plainfield

Bike Crashes

Focused on legal representation for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' carelessness or unsafe conditions.

Flame Injuries

Providing expert legal help for patients of grave burn injuries caused by mishaps or recklessness.

Medical Negligence

Offering expert legal support for patients affected by clinical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Commodities Liability

Addressing cases involving defective products, providing adept legal services to consumers affected by faulty goods.

Nursing Home Mistreatment

Defending the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to abuse in aged care environments, ensuring restitution.

Slip and Stumble Accidents

Professional in tackling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal support to victims seeking compensation for their damages.

Newborn Wounds

Delivering legal help for families affected by medical malpractice resulting in neonatal injuries.

Automobile Accidents

Collisions: Committed to aiding clients of car accidents obtain fair remuneration for injuries and losses.

Scooter Mishaps

Expert in providing legal services for victims involved in scooter accidents, ensuring just recovery for injuries.

Semi Incident

Ensuring experienced legal assistance for clients involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing appropriate compensation for hurts.

Building Site Accidents

Committed to defending workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or misconduct.

Neurological Injuries

Dedicated to extending professional legal representation for victims suffering from cognitive injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Bite Harms

Adept at dealing with cases for people who have suffered traumas from puppy bites or beast attacks.

Jogger Mishaps

Dedicated to legal services for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering restitution.

Unwarranted Death

Fighting for relatives affected by a wrongful death, delivering compassionate and adept legal support to ensure justice.

Neural Trauma

Committed to representing patients with paralysis, offering compassionate legal assistance to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer