Construction Site Accident Attorney in Plano

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you’re facing the aftermath of an unforeseen construction site accident, Carlson Bier is here to protect your rights. As a leading personal injury law firm in Illinois, we offer comprehensive legal counsel specializing in Construction Site Accidents and occupational hazard cases. With us by your side, be assured we will employ our vast expertise and knowledge to fight for the justice you rightly deserve. We understand that accidents on construction sites can leave long-lasting physical and emotional scars; hence our dedicated team tirelessly works to get you optimum compensation securing easy recovery for health care costs, recompense lost earnings resulting from disabilities or injuries sustained at such accidents. We pledge an unwavering commitment towards obtaining rightful legal solutions expediently because every client matters to us. Our unparalleled track record within this field speaks volumes about the level of competence presented by Carlson Bier – making it a prime consideration when seeking expert counselling following any unfortunate incident in a high-risk industry like construction. Trusting us means relying on experts who embody unprecedented professionalism whilst ensuring effective resolution schemes tailored as per individual needs related with Construction Site Accidents.

About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in Plano Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand that construction work is a hazardous industry. Despite meticulous safety measures, accidents on construction sites still occur. Injuries sustained from these types of mishaps can be devastating and life-altering. This specific subject matter revolves around the complexities of Construction Site Accidents and how professional legal intervention helps maximize your compensation claim.

When considering Construction Site Accidents, there are a few crucial factors to weigh in:

• Gravity of injuries: Typically, construction site injuries may range from minor abrasions/cuts to severe traumas like fractures, spinal cord injuries or even fatalities.

• Contributory negligence: Often workers inadvertently contribute to their accident due to non-adherence with safety regulations.

• Employer liability: If an employer fails to maintain safety benchmarks at the worksite resulting in accidents, they could be held accountable for workplace injury claims.

Similar scenarios may seem overwhelming when confronted alone; it’s essential you align yourself with qualified personal injury lawyers who focus exclusively in this field. Here at Carlson Bier – a dedicated team is committed solely towards advocating for victims of Construction Site Accidents across Illinois.

Several potential hazards exist within construction environments. Falls from height (ladders/scaffolding), Falling Objects hitting personnel below, Machinery-related incidents or exposure to dangerous substances fall within common causes for construction site accidents . Vital details often overlooked by victims include:

• Witness statements: Gather any available witnesses immediately after the incident .

• Medical bills reimbursement: Keep track of all medical expenses incurred because of the incident.

• Photographs : Capturing images of injury & area where incident occurred could play significant role during legal proceedings .

Comprehensive knowledge about OSHA standards , duty-of-care concept and other intricacies revolving around personal-injury law allows our lawyers at Carlson Bier ensure nothing gets overlooked while pursuing your case efficiently.The firm is sophisticatedly manned with attorneys whose extensive courtroom experience will dedicate invaluable insight into securing rightful damages owed back to you .

Time limitation constraints and intricacies of Illinois’ statute of laws concerning workplace accidents justly necessitates an expeditious approach. Be confident knowing that the time-sensitive process is handled accurately and timely by the practiced hands at Carlson Bier.

The financial burdens from medical bills, lost wages due to inability to work, along with emotional strain inflicted post-accident can quickly mount up . Facing such predicaments require stout representation who strives to procure maximum possible compensation as per your entitlements. It’s noteworthy that damages claimed will be determined under Illinois state law by factors such as severity of injury, influence on earning capacity and expected future medical expenses amongst others.

Each Construction Site Accident case is essentially unique with complex variables involved. Having an assertive legal counsel capable of thorough investigation ,strong negotiation abilities against insurance companies coupled with courtroom proficiency for potential trial scenarios significantly impacts overall outcome in favoring victim’s best interest .

Your option ahead now – is taking a decisive first step onto optimistically claim back control over zugzwanging circumstances enforced upon you through no fault of your own. By clicking on the button below ,you choose to invest in quality legal assistance which prides itself on crafting individualized cost-effective strategies aimed straightforwardly at achieving your fair restitution.

Accidents are never planned for . They could ambush anyone without notice leaving lasting effects not only physically but mentally too. Feeling entrapped within aftermath repercussions is insurmountably challenging ; reach out with confidence today – let our exceptionally renowned team’s expertise help untangle complexities empowering you move forward building stronger tomorrows together –Click below NOW and obtain a comprehensive understanding about how much worth YOUR CASE IS!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Plano Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Plano

Areas of Practice in Plano

Pedal Cycle Crashes

Focused on legal assistance for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' negligence or hazardous conditions.

Flame Burns

Providing skilled legal support for victims of grave burn injuries caused by incidents or recklessness.

Clinical Misconduct

Delivering specialist legal representation for individuals affected by physician malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Products Accountability

Taking on cases involving problematic products, supplying specialist legal help to clients affected by product-related injuries.

Elder Malpractice

Defending the rights of seniors who have been subjected to malpractice in aged care environments, ensuring protection.

Tumble and Fall Injuries

Skilled in tackling tumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to sufferers seeking compensation for their injuries.

Birth Harms

Supplying legal assistance for households affected by medical malpractice resulting in neonatal injuries.

Vehicle Accidents

Incidents: Devoted to aiding sufferers of car accidents gain appropriate remuneration for damages and destruction.

Bike Crashes

Committed to providing legal services for motorcyclists involved in bike accidents, ensuring adequate recompense for injuries.

Trucking Accident

Delivering specialist legal advice for victims involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing fair settlement for hurts.

Worksite Incidents

Dedicated to assisting workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or carelessness.

Brain Damages

Expert in offering compassionate legal support for patients suffering from head injuries due to negligence.

Dog Attack Traumas

Expertise in managing cases for persons who have suffered harms from dog attacks or animal assaults.

Pedestrian Incidents

Focused on legal support for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering claims.

Unfair Fatality

Fighting for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, extending understanding and professional legal guidance to ensure justice.

Neural Trauma

Committed to representing persons with spinal cord injuries, offering dedicated legal guidance to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer