Construction Site Accident Attorney in Poplar Grove

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When faced with the aftermath of a construction site accident in Poplar Grove, it is crucial to seek legal representation. Carlson Bier presents an unparalleled choice. Possessing extensive experience handling personal injury cases specifically related to construction site accidents, we are well-versed and sensitive to the challenges our clients face. Our tenacious team diligently investigates every angle of your case, working tirelessly to secure you just compensation for medical bills, lost wages, pain and suffering. At Carlson Bier not only do we understand Illinois laws pertaining these type of incidents thoroughly but state-of-the-art resources at our disposition aid us in building persuasive arguments for maximum benefits on behalf of our clients’. Committed fiercely in upholding your rights against insurance companies or negligent third parties involved; trust that with Carlson Bier you have compassionate yet formidable allies striving for optimal results in your case’s resolution-making us a wise consideration when needing attorney support following a Construction Site Accident.

About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in Poplar Grove Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our mandate is to ensure that your rights are safeguarded, especially when construction site accidents occur. No one expects to be injured on their job site but when disaster strikes, possessing the knowledge on how you can protect yourself legally becomes paramount. As a personal injury attorney group based across Illinois, we want to enlighten you about the key components of Construction Site Accident cases.

Construction site accidents span an array of incidents including falling from heights, being crushed under heavy machinery or materials, electric shock or even getting hit by a moving object. Such accidents can result in severe injuries and long-term incapacitation affecting not only your health but also your income earning potential.

Understanding the main reasons responsible for such mishaps is essential:

– Lack of training: Employers are required by law to provide proper safety training to workers involved in hazardous work conditions before they commence any task.

– Safety Equipment Failure: There may be cases where despite taking precautions, protective gear malfunctions leading to serious harm.

– Reckless Behavior: Studies have shown a high occurrence rate of accidents due to reckless behavior within the workplace.

Employing adequate legal representation ensures that rightful compensation is pursued diligently for medical bills incurred post-accident and lost wages during recovery period among other compensations relating to physical pain and emotional anguish.

The Carlson Bier team excels at managing claims against negligent employers or third parties who contributed towards unsafe working environments resulting in drilling accidents. We methodically collect evidence which could involve obtaining CCTV footage of the accident scene or interviewing co-workers present at the incident location.

One key point often overlooked amidst the chaos following an unexpected mishap is that there are time limitations set forth by Illinois Law regarding filing these lawsuits. To make sure no procedural rule jeopardizes your case worth preserving factual material ASAP post event cannot be emphasised enough.

We meticulously navigate this process with extreme dedication and assertive negotiation tactics lest any factor precludes full and rightful compensation. Having helped numerous clients regain their footing after debilitating mishaps, Carlson Bier is equipped to deliver justice even when faced with the most challenging of accidents.

Even though companies have methods in place for prevention of workplace casualties, accidents don’t stem from negligence alone; equipment failure, hazardous working conditions or even simple human error can contribute towards occurrence as well. The law outlines employer’s responsibilities towards creating safe environs for employees but laws are often deliberately overlooked or simply misunderstood leading to tragic consequences.

The aftermath of an accident keeps you occupied adjusting to potentially life-altering changes in personal damage like mobility challenges possibly requiring assistive devices or mental health disorders triggered by trauma suffered. During such times, the expertise available at hand plays a significant role in assuaging your stress levels and putting forward the best legal strategy tailored specifically for your case.

A construction site is deemed to be high-risk terrain calling for safety standards beyond compare. Accidents on these sites tend to bear grave implications calling for reliable representation extending beyond mere reparation claims. It isn’t a momentary phase but charting out long-term financial gains that factor in medical bills coupled with lost wages and counselling sessions required further down recovering roadmap.

We appreciate you taking time off your busy day to better understand the nuances surrounding construction site accidents today. Knowledge helps lever our situation better while bracing against unfortunate incidents undoubtedly impacting lives deeply. Reach out today by clicking the button below allowing us access into how we may assess what your potential claim could be worth! Your empowering journey starts here clearly defining every step within proceedings eliminating ambiguity before our mutually beneficial alliance begins showcasing our expertise dedicatedly focused on enhancing quality of your life post misadventure taking it all one stride at a time!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Poplar Grove Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Poplar Grove

Areas of Practice in Poplar Grove

Bike Mishaps

Expert in legal services for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to others's recklessness or hazardous conditions.

Thermal Damages

Providing professional legal help for individuals of major burn injuries caused by events or carelessness.

Hospital Carelessness

Providing professional legal advice for persons affected by medical malpractice, including negligent care.

Items Fault

Addressing cases involving defective products, delivering adept legal support to clients affected by product-related injuries.

Senior Abuse

Representing the rights of seniors who have been subjected to mistreatment in senior centers environments, ensuring justice.

Slip & Trip Incidents

Adept in dealing with slip and fall accident cases, providing legal assistance to victims seeking redress for their harm.

Birth Traumas

Providing legal aid for relatives affected by medical incompetence resulting in birth injuries.

Car Incidents

Crashes: Devoted to guiding individuals of car accidents get fair compensation for injuries and impairment.

Scooter Incidents

Expert in providing legal advice for bikers involved in scooter accidents, ensuring fair compensation for traumas.

18-Wheeler Mishap

Ensuring specialist legal services for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing just claims for losses.

Worksite Accidents

Committed to supporting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or negligence.

Brain Injuries

Focused on ensuring dedicated legal advice for victims suffering from neurological injuries due to misconduct.

K9 Assault Traumas

Adept at handling cases for individuals who have suffered harms from dog attacks or wildlife encounters.

Pedestrian Accidents

Specializing in legal assistance for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering compensation.

Unwarranted Death

Fighting for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, supplying understanding and adept legal guidance to ensure compensation.

Neural Injury

Focused on defending patients with vertebral damage, offering compassionate legal guidance to secure compensation.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer