...

Car Accident Attorney in Portland

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When facing the repercussions of a car accident, you deserve representation that stands for integrity, expertise, and unyielding commitment. Carlson Bier is that guiding force. As a leading law firm dedicated to personal injury cases including car accidents in Illinois state court systems, our legal team thrives on unwavering determination and deep-rooted experience to defend your rights ardently. Our track record speaks volumes as we’ve helped our clients secure significant settlements and verdicts in Portland’s jurisdiction—evidence of our widespread competence. Carefully navigating regulations inherent within intricate insurance laws becomes effortless when Carlson Bier is on your side since ensuring a maximum return on every claim becomes significantly increased with us by your side. Steering clear of self-representation ensures smart decision-making during challenging times; hence choosing Carlson Bier is profoundly beneficial – the right move towards justified compensation after an auto accident ordeal anywhere in Oregon’s most populous city.

About Carlson Bier

Car Accident Lawyers in Portland Illinois

At Carlson Bier, our unwavering commitment is to relentlessly advocate for victims of personal injury accidents throughout Illinois. Specialized in the realm of personal injury litigation, our law firm stands as an unyielding force against injustice and hardship linked to car accidents. We understand the trauma and turmoil you have been through – physically, emotionally, and financially; hence our goal is ensuring your voice is heard, your grievances addressed adequately, and securing the rightful compensation you deserve.

Knowledge is power and arming yourself with appropriate information about car accidents can significantly determine the success of your claim process. It’s essential to understand that after a car accident, there are immediate steps that need to be taken from collecting evidence at the accident scene capturing photographs if possible—contacting relevant authorities like police officers—to seeking immediate medical attention even before considering engaging a legal expert. Don’t forget to reach out officially notifying insurance companies about the situation. These proactive steps form concrete baselines for robust claims down the line.

Reaching out to competent attorneys like us at Carlson Bier ensures prompt action—keynotes including filing time-sensitive documents early enough which aids in maintaining substantive rights tied up in these give-and-take circumstances—that pave way for potential winning strategies during claims or trials processes.

To shed more light on this critical matter:

• Be conscious of timelines: Car Accident lawsuits fall under Illinois’ two-year statute limitation bound within which any court filings need materialising—a breach easily sees your case tossed out despite its validity.

• Understand comparative negligence: In situations where more than one party contributed to causing an accident – Illinois follows what is commonly referred as an “at-fault” system or modified comparatives negligence rule where allocation percentages do apply.

• Reality check on damages achievable: From tangible quantifiable damages such economic losses covering medical expenses lost earning capacities—to intangible non-economic losses suffering pain emotional distress scarring disfigurement—the spectrum wide open authenticates diverse possibilities uninformed parties often overlook.

• Dealing with insurance companies: Proceeding judiciously when communicating with insurance companies is paramount; an adept attorney features prominently here ensuring you do not fall prey to unwarranted low-ball settlements traps.

At Carlson Bier, we promise relentless representation protecting your rights while working tirelessly to negotiate the best settlement for your case. We are not afraid to step into the courtroom if it is in your best interest. Our experience and expertise assure you that no stone will be left unturned in seeking justice for your suffering and loss. Remember, our services are provided on a contingency basis—you do not pay us any legal fees until we successfully secure damages on your behalf.

Deciding whether you need legal advice after a car accident is not always straightforward. However, if significant injuries were sustained or substantial losses were incurred due to another’s negligence, engaging Carlson Bier’s proficient attorneys can make all the difference.

Personal injury claims involve many intricate details beyond mere accident facts—from interpreting complex laws understanding opaque liability issues manifesting clear delineation of at noneconomic vs economic damages navigating confusing negotiation processes knowing nuances court systems—to raising cogent arguments crucial phases litigation—you require experts who walk alongside you throughout this journey alleviating anxiety stress often entailed freeing up time focus on recovery better peace mind.

Now that you understand the complexities surrounding car accidents and how Carlson Bier can play an instrumental role in reclaiming control over your life by fighting aggressively for your rightful compensation – It’s high time to take decisive action. Click on the button below right now, find out what value lies locked up in your case’s worth – remember, under our watch that amount could significantly increase given our proven track record pooled expertise over years’ passion dedication serving justice delivering real tangible results transforming lives positively across Illinois!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Portland Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Car Accident FAQ​

The most common causes of car accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause drivers to lose control of their vehicles.
  • Vehicle defects: Defective vehicles can cause accidents in a variety of ways.
  • Weather conditions: Rain, snow, and ice can make roads slick and dangerous.

If you are involved in a car accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a car accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a car accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a car accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

In a car accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

    Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your vehicle.

    Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for car accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Portland

Areas of Practice in Portland

Bike Accidents

Dedicated to legal support for people injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' carelessness or unsafe conditions.

Flame Injuries

Giving specialist legal assistance for victims of grave burn injuries caused by incidents or indifference.

Medical Malpractice

Offering experienced legal assistance for individuals affected by medical malpractice, including negligent care.

Items Obligation

Managing cases involving unsafe products, extending skilled legal assistance to customers affected by defective items.

Elder Mistreatment

Representing the rights of elders who have been subjected to malpractice in senior centers environments, ensuring fairness.

Trip & Fall Incidents

Professional in tackling fall and trip accident cases, providing legal representation to persons seeking compensation for their suffering.

Neonatal Wounds

Supplying legal help for loved ones affected by medical negligence resulting in newborn injuries.

Motor Crashes

Accidents: Concentrated on helping victims of car accidents obtain equitable settlement for wounds and destruction.

Motorbike Accidents

Focused on providing legal support for motorcyclists involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring justice for traumas.

18-Wheeler Crash

Extending expert legal representation for persons involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing adequate compensation for harms.

Worksite Incidents

Concentrated on supporting workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to negligence or carelessness.

Neurological Harms

Expert in ensuring dedicated legal assistance for victims suffering from brain injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Traumas

Proficient in addressing cases for victims who have suffered wounds from dog attacks or animal attacks.

Jogger Accidents

Committed to legal assistance for walkers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering damages.

Unfair Fatality

Fighting for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, extending compassionate and skilled legal guidance to ensure fairness.

Backbone Injury

Expert in supporting individuals with paralysis, offering expert legal support to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer