Construction Site Accident Attorney in Sandoval

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Experience post-accident trauma in a construction site at Sandoval? You need a legal team with extensive knowledge and sterling reputation. Carlson Bier, renowned Illinois outfit maintaining an exceptional legal approach towards Construction Site Accidents, is your staunchest ally. We offer dedicated service from seasoned personal injury lawyers well versed in the complexities of such daunting experiences as yours. Handled by our group, multiple instances involving businesses and unions testify to our proficient litigation skills across diverse cases attributed to equipment malfunctions or employer negligence. Unrelenting advocates for justice and rightful compensation, we keenly grasp the economic plight that echoes every injury’s emotional toll rendering stand-bys like Workers’ Comp inadequate – hence our commitment to securing you maximum viability under law’s scope while sparing you legalese intricacy. To residents around Sandoval: choosing Carlson Bier imparts unwavering trustability wherever timely claims are required; consider us your lex loci referencing all pertinent accident legislation within statewide Illinois regulations – professional accessibility underlined with local familiarity! Rest easy knowing your cause is championed by intriguing expertise delivered assiduously amid empathic understanding proffered exclusively from Carlson Bier.

About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in Sandoval Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand that a construction site accident can cause devastating consequences not just physically, but also emotionally and financially. Our team of personal injury attorneys specialize in helping victims navigate through these challenging times while fighting for the maximum financial compensation they deserve.

Construction sites are inherently dangerous places – heavy machinery, precarious heights, and hazardous materials all contribute to the risks faced by workers daily. Common injuries resulting from construction accidents include falls from height, caught-in/between objects incidents, electrocutions, and struck by object events. These accidents often result in traumatic brain injuries, broken bones, spinal cord damage or even fatal injuries — leaving individuals with lasting debilitations requiring medical treatment and rehabilitation, lost income due to inability to work during recovery period as well unbearable physical pain and suffering.

Understanding the dynamics involved in a construction site accident is integral for obtaining fair compensation for your losses. At Carlson Bier:

• We scrutinize every aspect of your case meticulously.

• Seek out hidden parties that may share responsibility for your accident

• Collect crucial evidence such as eyewitness testimonies and data logs from machinery if applicable.

• Engage renowned field experts who will fortify our evaluations of potential safety violations at construction sites

Recently injured? Don’t try handling it on your own. Let knowledgeable personal injury lawyers guide you through this complex process.

Perhaps one of the most important aspects after getting injured at a job site is determining liability. Due to the multiple entities involved – owners, architects/engineers or contractors/subcontractors etc.– assigning blame might be more intricate than anticipated so an experienced attorney’s network can dramatically increase chances of successful claim resolution.

Illinois has strict laws governing worker’s rights enabling them file claims directly against third-party negligent company when they suffered harm on their premises due to unsafe conditions which employer/employee relationship normally wouldn’t cover under normal circumstances (worker’s compensation limitations). Yet many are unaware about these legal bolts opening up to compensation beyond regular workers’ comp benefits. This underlines the importance of seeking professional legal help when you’ve been injured on a construction site.

As dedicated personal injury lawyers, the team at Carlson Bier operates on a contingent-fee basis– meaning we won’t charge you unless we win your case. We work passionately towards getting accident victims maximum compensation for their losses so they can rebuild lives shattered by unfortunate accidents.

Filing an injury claim after a construction accident requires expert knowledge not just of law but also construction safety standards and regulations. Engaging our experienced attorneys increases your odds of winning fair settlements to cover huge medical bills, rehabilitation costs, loss of income during recovery period plus non-economic damages like pain & suffering or disfigurement etc. which laws in Illinois permit under certain circumstances.

At Carlson Bier, we understand that no two cases are alike. Our individualized approach lets us deliver personalized solutions tailored specifically to address unique situations faced by each client keeping priorities and wellbeing above everything else.

Every detail is accounted as we fight for justice owed to innocent victims inadvertently ignoring the misgiving of complex litigations because every life matters equally!

Ask yourself – “Does my current situation reflect any instance pointed here?” If yes, click the button below right away for claims evaluation from seasoned professionals waiting eagerly to bring you long overdue justice all free-of cost! Discover today how much YOUR case might be worth without obligation or any risk because your search for relentless advocates ends here – at Carlson Bier where excellence meets empathy!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Sandoval Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Sandoval

Areas of Practice in Sandoval

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Proficient in legal representation for people injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' recklessness or perilous conditions.

Flame Traumas

Supplying skilled legal help for individuals of intense burn injuries caused by events or misconduct.

Healthcare Malpractice

Offering expert legal support for patients affected by clinical malpractice, including surgical errors.

Merchandise Fault

Managing cases involving dangerous products, extending skilled legal services to individuals affected by defective items.

Geriatric Abuse

Advocating for the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to mistreatment in care facilities environments, ensuring compensation.

Stumble & Slip Injuries

Skilled in addressing stumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to individuals seeking compensation for their damages.

Infant Injuries

Providing legal support for loved ones affected by medical incompetence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Motor Collisions

Incidents: Dedicated to helping victims of car accidents receive just payout for harms and destruction.

Motorbike Crashes

Dedicated to providing legal advice for motorcyclists involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring fair compensation for losses.

Big Rig Collision

Ensuring expert legal assistance for clients involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing just recovery for losses.

Construction Collisions

Focused on defending workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or negligence.

Cerebral Injuries

Specializing in extending expert legal advice for victims suffering from cerebral injuries due to carelessness.

Canine Attack Harms

Expertise in handling cases for individuals who have suffered traumas from dog attacks or beast attacks.

Cross-walker Mishaps

Dedicated to legal support for walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering restitution.

Unjust Fatality

Working for loved ones affected by a wrongful death, delivering compassionate and professional legal representation to ensure compensation.

Neural Damage

Dedicated to advocating for individuals with vertebral damage, offering professional legal representation to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer