FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312.622.2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Car Accident Attorney in Schram City

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Google Guaranteed 5 Stars Advanced Local Service Ads Carlsonbier
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When in Schram City, and faced with the adversity of a car accident, enduring the potentially daunting maze that auto accident law tends to be is no small feat. For relief from these challenges, trust Carlson Bier. As top-tier personal injury lawyers in Illinois, we lead with an uncommon blend of empathy and productivity essential for car accidents scenarios. Our expertise spans several decades ensuring comprehensive representation tailored to maximize your entitled benefits seamlessly. At Carlson Bier, we are committed advocates who negotiate zealously on your behalf when dealing with insurance companies while fighting tirelessly for fair resolutions in court where necessary. Undoubtedly, our proven track record makes us a formidable ally during such difficult times. Steeped in profound understanding of Illinois’s legal framework related to vehicle collisions coupled with dedicated client-centric service positions us as ideal partners navigating through these complex situations alongside you. Relentlessly striving towards seeking justice and deserved compensation for victims sets Carlson Bier apart as superior practitioners when considering legal support for car accidents scenarios within the constitutional bounds of Illinois’s jurisdiction.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Car Accident Lawyers in Schram City Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in personal injury cases while primarily focusing on car accidents. Based in Illinois, our expert team of experienced attorneys is committed to ensuring that every victim secures fair compensation for their losses. Our core mission and philosophy revolve around offering unparalleled legal services with empathy and compassion.

Every year, numerous individuals become victims of car accidents leading to detrimental effects encompassing not only physical but also emotional distress. Furthermore, these accidents often result in significant financial burdens owing to medical bills or loss of income if you are unable to work during the recovery period. At Carlson Bier, we understand meticulous knowledge about car accident proceedings is paramount when preparing for a potential case. The following key points underscore crucial aspects regarding this:

• Understanding Negligence: Essentially road users have a duty of care towards each other. If they fail in fulfilling this obligation resulting in an accident, it can be termed as negligence.

• Proving Fault: Demonstrating the fault of the party involved can significantly dictate how the verdict leans. This involves gathering adequate irrefutable proof.

• Documenting Evidence: It’s beneficial to meticulously document everything from medical records indicating injuries sustained, details pertaining to repair costs for vehicle damage or even letters from employers substantiating time lost at work due to the crash.

• Statute of Limitations: In Illinois, it’s vital to file your car accident claim within two years from the date of occurrence.

Our commitment extends beyond winning cases; education and guidance on such topics comprise our service pillar too. We believe strongly in empowering our clientele through comprehensive education which is why we invest heavily into equipping them appropriately with accuracy, quality and timely information about personal injury lawsuits stemming from auto crashes.

Traversing through such difficult matters by yourself could put you at a disadvantage given its complex nature involving associated regulations and necessary protocols that must strictly be adhered to in order for you ensure maximum possible compensation for your damages. With substantial experience at our helm, we find solace in offering industry-leading advice and advocacy for clients who entrust us with their cases.

Equally important to underline is that Carlson Bier is not located in Schram City. Misrepresentation of practice location would be a direct violation of Illinois law which expressly forbids advertising presence within areas where firms do not maintain physical offices.

In conclusion, it’s pivotal to prioritize securing capable representation when navigating car accident lawsuits as this could significantly affect the final verdict concerning your compensation amount.

Our driving ethos encircles provision of world-class service coupled with robust legal assistance thus assuring you’ll secure every penny you rightfully deserve as compensation for any endured injuries or distress consequential from auto accidents. Following this passionate belief, we cordially invite you to tap onto the button below to get a free case evaluation instantly. This will help you understand how much your case might potentially be worth.

At Carlson Bier, your well-being matters but most importantly – justice does too. Trust us to go above and beyond ensuring you attain just that! Dive deeper into finding out what your deserved compensation claim should look like by clicking on the tab below; knowledge has never been so empowering!

Remember, at Carlson Bier we don’t just represent – We advocate fiercely for justice.

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Schram City Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Car Accident FAQ​

The most common causes of car accidents in Chicago include:

  • Driver negligence: This includes distracted driving, speeding, and failing to yield.
  • Road conditions: Potholes, uneven pavement, and other road hazards can cause drivers to lose control of their vehicles.
  • Vehicle defects: Defective vehicles can cause accidents in a variety of ways.
  • Weather conditions: Rain, snow, and ice can make roads slick and dangerous.

If you are involved in a car accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Exchange information with the other driver. Get their name, address, insurance information, and license plate number.
  • Take pictures of the scene of the accident. This will help you document what happened and build your case if you decide to file a lawsuit.
  • Report the accident to the police. This will create a record of the accident and help you get help if you need it.
  • Contact a car accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a car accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the driver who caused your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a car accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

In a car accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.

     

    Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your vehicle.

    Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for car accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Schram City

Areas of Practice in Schram City

Bike Crashes

Proficient in legal representation for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' negligence or risky conditions.

Thermal Wounds

Providing professional legal advice for patients of major burn injuries caused by events or negligence.

Medical Incompetence

Providing experienced legal representation for individuals affected by healthcare malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Items Obligation

Addressing cases involving defective products, supplying professional legal services to individuals affected by product malfunctions.

Aged Abuse

Defending the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to neglect in elderly care environments, ensuring restitution.

Tumble and Fall Mishaps

Specialist in dealing with slip and fall accident cases, providing legal advice to victims seeking restitution for their harm.

Childbirth Damages

Offering legal assistance for households affected by medical misconduct resulting in infant injuries.

Motor Collisions

Crashes: Committed to assisting clients of car accidents get equitable settlement for damages and harm.

Two-Wheeler Accidents

Dedicated to providing legal assistance for victims involved in scooter accidents, ensuring justice for losses.

Trucking Mishap

Offering expert legal advice for clients involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing appropriate settlement for injuries.

Construction Site Crashes

Focused on assisting employees or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or carelessness.

Brain Impairments

Expert in providing expert legal representation for persons suffering from cerebral injuries due to incidents.

Dog Attack Harms

Expertise in tackling cases for clients who have suffered wounds from puppy bites or beast attacks.

Cross-walker Crashes

Dedicated to legal representation for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering recovery.

Unjust Fatality

Working for families affected by a wrongful death, providing compassionate and adept legal guidance to ensure restitution.

Vertebral Harm

Focused on advocating for persons with paralysis, offering compassionate legal guidance to secure settlement.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440

cb
FREE CASE CONSULTATION

312.622.2900

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

© 2024 All Rights Reserved | Carlson Bier

Web Design By Bosseo​