...

Spinal Cord Injuries Attorney in Shelbyville

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

Understanding the emotional and physical challenges posed by spinal cord injuries, Carlson Bier stands ready to defend those seeking legal restitution in Shelbyville. Possessing a thorough cognizance of Illinois law and offering a formidable proficiency in personal injury litigation, we anchor our practice on upholding justice for spinal cord injury victims. At Carlson Bier, every case receives individual attention from seasoned attorneys adept at unraveling complex medical jargon while skillfully handling insurance companies’ tactics. Our sterling reputation emanates from decades of successful verdicts across Illinois secured through relentless pursuit of compensation for clients’ suffering and financial burden following their devastating injuries. Keenly aware that your crucial first step is choosing an attorney focused exclusively on spinal cord injuries cases, we encourage you to choose competence; choose experience; eventually advanced knowledge- Choose Carlson Bier! We combine personalized approach with unmatched expertise to help you navigate your journey towards just recompense for your pain–one informed decision at a time. With us on your side, let justice prevail!

About Carlson Bier

Spinal Cord Injuries Lawyers in Shelbyville Illinois

Navigating the complex world of personal injury law can be a daunting challenge, especially when dealing with such severe conditions as spinal cord injuries. At Carlson Bier, an eminent Illinois-based Personal Injury Attorney Group, we are adept at guiding you through these intricate legal dynamics while ensuring your rights and interests prevail. We understand that every case is unique, highlighting the need for individual treatment with utmost importance on the client’s welfare.

Spinal Cord Injuries (SCIs) primarily result from several issues such as car accidents, slip and falls, sporting activities, acts of violence among others. These devastating incidents often alter lives dramatically in various aspects including finances due to high medical costs and earning potentials due to inability to work. Other social effects include mental distress and strains on relationships. Thus our assistance goes beyond mere legal representation; it covers emotional support and comprehensive counseling throughout this ordeal.

We deeply appreciate how much coping with a spinal cord injury can drastically transform lives hence our commitment to delivering outstanding legal service:

• Comprehensive Case Evaluation: We provide elaborate scrutiny of your SCI situation to offer a clear roadmap for possible compensation.

• Filing for Lawsuit: Coupled with our extensive experience in litigations involving SCIs, we apply meticulous precision while filing lawsuits aimed at obtaining maximum benefits.

• Expert Legal Advice: Through strategic counsel based on decades-long performance in securing full compensation packages across Illinois for SCI patients, we deliver insightful advice capable of optimizing opportunities critical to successful outcomes.

• Negotiation expertise: As accomplished negotiators well-versed with engaging insurance companies or defense attorneys aggressively yet diplomatically when seeking fair settlements.

Honoring our pledge for transparent communication accessible by all; let’s delve further into why knowing the nature of Spinal Cord Injuries is invaluable during litigation procedures. The human spinal cord essentially connects the brain and body speeding up responses significantly – brought about by its possession of two kinds of matter: white matter carrying signals between the Barkin brain and the rest of the body, and gray matter dealing with sensory perception. Consequently, when spinal cord injuries occur causing partial or total loss in motor control and sensation below the site of damage, proving negligence becomes untenable due to diagnosis complexities.

Henceforth, one will appreciate that SCIs are divided into two broad categories Complete SCIs involving entire loss in sensory or motor function below injury sites and Incomplete: where some degree of functionality remains after an SCI. Further exploration reveals how Tetraplegia incorporating paralysis from neck downwards including arms, hands, trunk alongside legs is another significant type as well as Paraplegia featuring paralysis affecting all/part of trunks legs & pelvic organs only but not impacting arm functions. Knowing these subtle yet discerning differences enhances possibilities for arriving at fair compensations since each variant embodies varied care requirements plus diverse financial implications different impacts on victims lifestyles.

Carlson Bier prides itself on being a law firm persevering through every hurdle to guarantee maximum benefits for our clients grappling with Spinal Cord Injuries throughout Illinois. This quest underscores why it’s of paramount importance that you seek counsel from Carlson Bier; attorneys truly recognizing what you’re experiencing—attorneys vested in your wellbeing using their proficiency to ensure compensation adequately covers medical bills (both current and future), rehabilitation expenses, lost wages irrespective whether temporary or permanent not excluding noneconomic damages associated encompassing pain & suffering alongside lifestyle adjustments hence collectively ensuring brighter futures post-SCIs.

To learn more about pursuing your rights following a life-altering spinal cord injury, kindly click on the button below. Permit us offer comprehensive legal insights aimed at making a markedly meaningful difference during such challenging times by expertly evaluating what your worth could be in such personal injury lawsuits. At Carlson Bier; we stand ready always steadfastly advocating for our clients’ rights in pursuit of justice nobly navigating the very depths ensuring full compensations because we firmly believe nothing should stand in the way of your recovery.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Shelbyville Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Spinal Cord Injury FAQ​

Spinal cord injuries are commonly caused by traumatic events such as vehicle accidents, falls, sports injuries, and acts of violence like gunshot wounds. Medical conditions like arthritis, cancer, or infections can also lead to spinal cord damage.

Symptoms of a spinal cord injury can vary depending on the severity and location of the injury. Common symptoms include loss of movement, loss of sensation (including the ability to feel heat, cold, and touch), loss of bladder or bowel control, exaggerated reflex activities or spasms, changes in sexual function, pain or an intense stinging sensation caused by damage to the nerve fibers in the spinal cord, and difficulty breathing, coughing, or clearing secretions from your lungs.

The permanence of a spinal cord injury depends on the severity and type of injury. Complete spinal cord injuries, where all feeling and ability to control movement are lost below the spinal cord injury, have a lower chance of recovery. Incomplete injuries, where there is some motor or sensory function below the affected area, may allow for significant recovery. However, there is currently no cure for a spinal cord injury.

Immediate treatments for spinal cord injuries focus on minimizing further damage and include immobilization, surgery, and medications. Long-term treatment involves rehabilitation, which can include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and counseling to help with the emotional aspect of the injury. Technological advances such as exoskeletons, electrical stimulation devices, and ongoing research into cell regeneration and repair are also promising areas for treatment.

The impact of a spinal cord injury on daily life varies widely and depends on the severity of the injury. It can lead to reduced mobility or paralysis, requiring the use of wheelchairs or other assistive devices. It often necessitates modifications to living spaces, vehicles, and workplaces. Spinal cord injuries can also impact personal care, bladder and bowel management, and sexual health. Support systems, adaptive technologies, and rehabilitation can play significant roles in helping individuals lead fulfilling lives post-injury.

All Attorney Services in Shelbyville

Areas of Practice in Shelbyville

Two-Wheeler Collisions

Focused on legal services for people injured in bicycle accidents due to others's indifference or unsafe conditions.

Fire Wounds

Giving adept legal help for victims of severe burn injuries caused by incidents or misconduct.

Clinical Malpractice

Ensuring experienced legal advice for persons affected by medical malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Merchandise Obligation

Taking on cases involving dangerous products, providing skilled legal services to clients affected by faulty goods.

Nursing Home Neglect

Representing the rights of seniors who have been subjected to misconduct in senior centers environments, ensuring restitution.

Fall and Tumble Occurrences

Specialist in tackling stumble accident cases, providing legal advice to sufferers seeking compensation for their injuries.

Neonatal Harms

Extending legal support for relatives affected by medical malpractice resulting in birth injuries.

Car Accidents

Incidents: Dedicated to helping victims of car accidents gain appropriate remuneration for hurts and impairment.

Motorbike Collisions

Specializing in providing legal support for riders involved in motorcycle accidents, ensuring justice for losses.

Big Rig Incident

Ensuring experienced legal assistance for clients involved in lorry accidents, focusing on securing appropriate compensation for injuries.

Construction Site Mishaps

Dedicated to defending workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to safety violations or recklessness.

Neurological Impairments

Focused on delivering expert legal services for individuals suffering from brain injuries due to negligence.

Dog Bite Wounds

Skilled in addressing cases for victims who have suffered wounds from dog attacks or wildlife encounters.

Pedestrian Crashes

Specializing in legal services for walkers involved in accidents, providing professional services for recovering recovery.

Undeserved Demise

Striving for grieving parties affected by a wrongful death, delivering caring and experienced legal representation to ensure compensation.

Spinal Cord Injury

Expert in defending clients with backbone trauma, offering expert legal representation to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer