Construction Site Accident Attorney in Sherman

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

When you’re in need of experienced, dedicated legal representation following a construction site accident in Sherman, look no further than Carlson Bier. Our attorneys understand the complexities and uncertainties that arise after such an unfortunate event. With a deep knowledge of Illinois law related to personal injury cases, we confidently navigate the legal system on behalf of those who are left physically and emotionally distressed by accidents at their workplace. Construction site accidents can lead to significant financial pressures due to medical bills or lost wages; our aim is ensuring fair compensation for all affected individuals. We pride ourselves on providing empathetic yet aggressive representation designed to secure satisfactory results in these difficult situations through careful investigation and negotiation strategies with insurers and responsible parties alike. Let Carlson Bier be your advocate during this challenging period — trust us with your case as countless others have across Illinois.

About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in Sherman Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we understand how traumatic and overwhelming a construction site accident can be. As Illinois-based personal injury attorneys, we are committed to fighting for your rights and securing the compensation you deserve. Our team of skilled legal professionals has an extensive track record in handling complex attendant claims associated with such accidents. We know that every case is unique and demands individual attention; this is why we offer personalized services anchored on mutual trust, open communication, and steadfast commitment.

Construction site accidents potentially encompass a broad range of injuries caused by different factors including but not limited to faulty machinery/equipment, inadequate safety measures or training, negligent supervision or co-worker behavior. The most common injuries encountered in these accidents include broken bones, burns, eye injuries, hearing loss from loud noise exposure, head/brain injuries from falling objects and even ,long-term health issues due to hazardous substance exposure.

It’s critical to note that pursuing a claim after a construction site injury requires distinct knowledge about specific laws governing the sector differently regulated compared to other fields. Luckily at Carlson Bier,

• We have a deep understanding of workers’ compensation laws.

• Our lawyers specialize in third-party negligence litigation relevant when someone other than your employer contributed to your accident.

• We go beyond singular employee-employer relationships seeking liability among contractors/subcontractors if they played any role in causing the mishap.

• Moreover, our attorneys strive hard to assess all available insurance resources ensuring maximum coverage for your damages/injuries.

Of course navigating through the complexities of construction law might take time while you struggle coping with mounting medical bills or lost incomes which often follow such incidents. To ease this pressure:

• The initial consultation session at Carlson Bier is always free.

• The team operates typically under contingency fee arrangements implying no upfront costs; it means that unless we enjoy success on your case there will be no charge for our service thus aligning our interests directly with yours.

Evidence gathering is a critical aspect of successfully validating your claims, which can include pictures of the workplace scene & injuries, obtaining witness statements, and securing copies of accident reports.

• Carlson Bier is well-versed in meticulously compiling such evidence maintaining an unbroken chain of custody

• We seek relevant medical records build connections between the incident at work & your sustaining injury.

Throughout our history helping clients recover financially after construction site accidents, we’ve come across numerous cases where initial settlement offers from insurance companies simply don’t cover long-term costs.

• At Carlson Bier we push fiercely towards just recompense refusing to settle for less than what you deserve because we genuinely value your future quality of life over swift case closure!

Of course, understanding every intricacy about construction site accident law can seem daunting but with right guidance it doesn’t have to be. Remember each passing day counts if you’re considering to file a lawsuit against responsible parties as statutes of limitation applicable on personal injury claims tend to vary.

In conclusion let us reaffirm that at Carlson Bier, we are steadfastly committed serving stakeholders amidst turbulent times following a construction site mishap. Our Illinois-based team blends professionalism with deep empathy distinguished by prompt response times and personalized touch fostering trust among valued clientele.

Too often victims underestimate how much their case is worth due perhaps to anxiety or lack knowledge about fair compensation standards. Remember clicking the button below now will navigate you through preliminary evaluations offering insights regarding potential claim size fitting your unique circumstances. Take control today! Let us translate legal complexities into clear actionable paths leading towards comprehensive justice! Click below and find out how much your case could truly be worth! Don’t wait another moment; take the important first step in rebuilding your life post-injury by connecting with our dedicated attorneys today.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Sherman Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Sherman

Areas of Practice in Sherman

Cycling Incidents

Proficient in legal assistance for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to other parties' negligence or risky conditions.

Burn Wounds

Offering adept legal help for sufferers of major burn injuries caused by events or indifference.

Physician Incompetence

Ensuring professional legal advice for patients affected by hospital malpractice, including surgical errors.

Commodities Fault

Taking on cases involving defective products, extending adept legal assistance to customers affected by faulty goods.

Senior Mistreatment

Advocating for the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to neglect in nursing homes environments, ensuring justice.

Slip & Slip Mishaps

Adept in addressing trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to sufferers seeking justice for their harm.

Birth Injuries

Extending legal aid for households affected by medical incompetence resulting in newborn injuries.

Motor Mishaps

Crashes: Committed to supporting patients of car accidents obtain equitable payout for injuries and impairment.

Scooter Crashes

Dedicated to providing representation for individuals involved in bike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for injuries.

Truck Incident

Offering specialist legal services for victims involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing just claims for damages.

Building Site Incidents

Dedicated to representing laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or carelessness.

Head Impairments

Specializing in offering dedicated legal advice for clients suffering from cognitive injuries due to incidents.

Dog Attack Damages

Proficient in managing cases for persons who have suffered harms from dog bites or animal attacks.

Jogger Crashes

Specializing in legal assistance for walkers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering claims.

Unfair Death

Striving for families affected by a wrongful death, offering sensitive and professional legal support to ensure redress.

Spinal Cord Harm

Dedicated to representing victims with backbone trauma, offering dedicated legal support to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer