Dog Bite Injuries Attorney in Sleepy Hollow

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

After suffering a dog bite injury, you need professional legal assistance to ensure justice is served swiftly and effectively. The Carlson Bier attorney group, based in Illinois, advocates fiercely for victims of dog bite injuries. We take pride in tirelessly defending your rights as we guide you through the complexities of the law. With comprehensive expertise handling various facets of personal injury law and focusing on cases involving dog bite incidents – our commitment towards our clients is second to none. Our reputation speaks volumes about our aptitude in facilitating positive outcomes for those who entrust us with their predicament. Retaining Carlson Bier implies embracing uncompromising legal support personalized to your unique situation and demands while being cognizant of utmost respect for all relevant regulations within Illinois jurisdiction. By emphasizing thorough case investigations, strategic advocacy, and above all compassion, we promise adept representation during this challenging time. Choose Carlson Bier – Your resolute partner fighting sustainingly against injuries from canine aggression.

About Carlson Bier

Dog Bite Injuries Lawyers in Sleepy Hollow Illinois

As specialized personal injury attorneys headquartered in Illinois, Carlson Bier has observed a significant need for expertise relating to dog bite injuries – an area that we aim to address through the provision of comprehensive, understandable content on our website. Being subjected to a canine attack can be not only traumatizing but also harmful in more ways than one might perceive initially: from physical wounds to potential infections and from emotional distress to financial burdens.

Victims often ask what constitutes a dog bite injury case. The answer lies in understanding liability and negligence rules. For instance, if you are bitten by someone else’s pet while lawfully present at their home or public place, you may have legal grounds for receiving compensation due to another party’s culpability. Various factors such as provocation by the victim might affect the claim validity; hence it is vital to consult with professional attorneys who can investigate your case extensively.

• Injuries which result from being knocked down are equally applicable in these cases.

• Medical expenses correlated with treating rabies, tetanus or any other infection should be recoverable.

• Non-economic damages like suffering and trauma rightfully fall under compensable losses.

Illinois specifically adheres strictly to “strict liability” concerning domestic animal attacks. This implies that no excuse or denial including lack of prior aggressive behavior or even unawareness about potential dangerousness will exonerate the owner unless exceptions apply.

Carlson Bier aims not just at unravelling this complexity involved but also assisting affected individuals in obtaining maximal possible benefits right from covering hospital bills & long term care needs caused by disfigurements up till dealing with insurances smartly. We pride ourselves on being adept negotiators compatible with every circumstance encountered across diverse clients over decades of practice in the field.

Moreover, time is typically limited for filing such claims according to statute limitations enshrined within Illinois law which again emphasizes upon urgency required for seeking effective legal counsel post-incident occurrence quickly rather than delaying this imperative step until much later when key evidence might already deteriorate.

Indeed, Carlson Bier prioritizes lifelong learning to maintain the most up-to-date knowledge of this evolving area of personal injury law. Our team also respects client confidentiality and steers away from any potential conflicts with current laws; noting that we do not claim physical presence anywhere other than our Illinois base which abides faithfully by state regulations respective of service advertisements.

Finally, what is your dog bite case worth? At Carlson Bier, we understand how such incidents can affect victims and their families while knowing how crucial adequate compensation becomes for conducting a normal life post-trauma. Through our dedication towards clients plus wealth of experience handling similar situations beforehand; rest assured every pertinent nuance will be analyzed personally ensuring reflection within final determination made subsequently. Take one constructive action today towards securing your future by clicking the button below to discover more concerning monetary evaluation procedure that could pave way towards justice deserved rightfully!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Sleepy Hollow Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Dog Bite Injuries FAQ​

The most common causes of dog bite injuries in Chicago include:

  • Unprovoked attacks: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone with no warning or provocation.
  • Provoked attacks: These attacks occur when someone does something to provoke the dog, such as teasing it or trying to take its food away.
  • Territory guarding: These attacks occur when a dog bites someone who is entering its territory.
  • Motherhood protection: These attacks occur when a mother dog bites someone who is approaching her puppies.

If you are bitten by a dog in Chicago, you should:

  • Clean the wound immediately with soap and water.
  • Apply a bandage to the wound.
  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think your injuries are serious, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the dog bite to the local animal control agency.

Dog bite injuries can have a number of long-term effects, both physical and emotional. Some people may experience chronic pain, scarring, or nerve damage. Others may develop a fear of dogs or other animals.

Illinois is a strict liability state when it comes to dog bites. This means that the owner of a dog is liable for any injuries caused by the dog, regardless of whether the owner knew the dog was capable of such behavior.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, such as if the person who was bitten was trespassing on private property or if the person provoked the dog.

Yes, you are entitled to compensation if you are bitten by a dog and have suffered injuries. You can file a lawsuit against the dog owner to recover your damages, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

All Attorney Services in Sleepy Hollow

Areas of Practice in Sleepy Hollow

Cycling Crashes

Focused on legal advocacy for individuals injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' indifference or dangerous conditions.

Flame Wounds

Supplying professional legal assistance for people of severe burn injuries caused by events or recklessness.

Medical Misconduct

Ensuring specialist legal support for clients affected by clinical malpractice, including negligent care.

Merchandise Obligation

Taking on cases involving problematic products, providing expert legal guidance to consumers affected by harmful products.

Elder Mistreatment

Protecting the rights of the elderly who have been subjected to mistreatment in aged care environments, ensuring justice.

Trip and Fall Injuries

Specialist in tackling slip and fall accident cases, providing legal services to individuals seeking recovery for their injuries.

Neonatal Injuries

Providing legal aid for relatives affected by medical carelessness resulting in birth injuries.

Automobile Accidents

Mishaps: Committed to supporting patients of car accidents gain just payout for wounds and destruction.

Scooter Mishaps

Dedicated to providing representation for bikers involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring rightful claims for harm.

Big Rig Crash

Delivering experienced legal representation for persons involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for hurts.

Worksite Accidents

Committed to supporting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or irresponsibility.

Cognitive Injuries

Dedicated to offering dedicated legal representation for clients suffering from neurological injuries due to misconduct.

Dog Attack Wounds

Expertise in dealing with cases for clients who have suffered damages from K9 assaults or animal assaults.

Jogger Incidents

Specializing in legal services for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering recovery.

Unfair Fatality

Striving for families affected by a wrongful death, supplying compassionate and professional legal guidance to ensure justice.

Neural Trauma

Specializing in representing patients with spine impairments, offering compassionate legal representation to secure recovery.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer