...

Burn Injuries in Staunton

Burn Injuries Trial Lawyers
Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with burn injuries, you need a reliable and experienced lawyer who understands the complexities of these cases. Carlson Bier is your top choice in this regard; we boast formidable experience in personal injury law and more specifically, burn injuries suits. We have unmatched resolve when advocating for victims that have suffered the trauma of burns as a result of another’s neglect or intentional harm. Furthermore, our commitment to each case sets us apart—we are not satisfied until justice has been served to our esteemed clients. Our expertise in Illinois statutes ensures compliance while maximizing compensation benefits for emotional distress, lost wages and medical expenses. As Carlson Bier attorneys continue to master the delicate intricacies woven into burn injury law practice within Staunton’s unique legal landscape, our mission remains clear: Defending your interests fiercely while upholding the rule of law impassively! Regardless of where you reside in Illinois State – Staunton included – let Carlson Bier be your torchbearer during trying times caused by unfortunate incidents resulting in severe burn-related health complications.

About Carlson Bier

Burn Injuries Lawyers in Staunton Illinois

Burn injuries can cause significant physical and emotional trauma, transforming lives in an instant. When you’re reeling from the aftermath of such a life-changing event, it’s crucial to have trustworthy help by your side. At Carlson Bier, we offer more than just that – we offer strong advocacy, compassionate understanding, and unwavering dedication shown by our experienced Illinois-based personal injury attorneys.

As experts in the field of burn injuries law, Carlson Bier places paramount importance on keeping clients informed about every aspect of this complex area. Burn injuries fall into several categories: first-degree burns which affect only the skin’s outer layer; second-degree burns that reach underneath the skin; third-degree burns affecting deeper tissues and organs; and fatal fourth-degree burns involving all layers of skin and underlying tissues.

Recognizing the type of burn injury is pivotal because it plays a key role in determining liability and calculating compensation claims. Each case varies greatly as they often depend on factors like medical costs for treatment or surgery, hospital bills, ongoing health care requirements due to disfigurement or disability resulting from severe burns, lost wages during recovery period or potential loss of future earnings if unable to work post-injury.

At Carlson Bier, we are dedicated to helping victims pursuing compensation via various legal channels obtain justice for their suffering caused due to another party’s negligence or recklessness.

• Medical malpractice (resulting from surgical errors or improper use of equipment)

• Workplace accidents (occurred at construction sites factories etc., where safety regulations might have been disregarded)

• Faulty products (caused by inefficient quality checking leading dangerous malfunction)

• Auto accidents (due to careless driving under influence).

Victims may also file compensation claims owing to non-economic losses including mental anguish traumatic stress loss companionship lifestyle changes incurred as a result of burn-injuries.

A well-documented claim supported with strong evidence increases chances significantly winning rightful settlement amounts fair representation rights interests throughout this challenging journey.

Often navigating the legal landscape becomes highly complex. This is where Carlson Bier, with its extensive experience in handling burn injury cases, steps in to shoulder the burden for you. We strive not just towards winning your case – our ultimate aim is to enable a smoother pathway to recovery and rebuilding life after devastating incidents.

Efficiently dealing with insurance companies, court proceedings and ensuring thorough investigation of every detail regarding your incident forms the core of our service. Additionally, we work on a contingency fee basis; this means that you pay nothing unless we secure compensation for you.

We believe education about burn injuries and corresponding law isn’t a one-time process but an ongoing dialogue between attorney and client. It equips you better to understand us as we battle together against all odds standing in way achieving justice rightful dues.

Pain suffering resulting from severe burn-related trauma often can’t be quantified into numerical figures alone. However, having trustworthy allies like Carlson Bier advocating on your behalf simplifies complexities associated proving liability determining settlement amounts providing survivors affected parties renewed hope a shot at full physical financial recovery.

To know more about how Carlson Bier helps clients like you navigate through implications of severe burn injuries or assess potential value of your legal claim against responsible parties – simply click on the button below. Don’t let uncertainty deter striving justice advocating yourself victim serious burns caused someone else’s negligence recklessness. Knowledge resources await—take first step towards rehabilitation by discovering what you’re owed today!

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Previous slide
Next slide
Education & Information

Resources For Staunton Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Burn Accident FAQ​

There are three main types of burn injuries:

  • First-degree burns: These burns affect the outer layer of skin, the epidermis. They cause redness, pain, and swelling.
  • Second-degree burns: These burns affect the epidermis and the dermis, the second layer of skin. They cause redness, pain, swelling, and blistering.
  • Third-degree burns: These burns destroy the epidermis and the dermis, and can also damage the underlying tissues. They cause white, leathery, or charred skin.

Burn injuries can be caused by a variety of factors, including:

  • Heat: This includes flames, hot liquids, steam, and hot objects.
  • Electricity: Electrical burns can be caused by contact with live wires or outlets.
  • Chemicals: Chemical burns can be caused by exposure to acids, alkalis, and other corrosive substances.
  • Radiation: Radiation burns can be caused by exposure to ultraviolet (UV) rays from the sun or to other types of radiation.

The signs and symptoms of a burn injury will vary depending on the severity of the burn. However, some common signs and symptoms include:

  • Redness
  • Pain
  • Swelling
  • Blistering
  • Charred skin
  • Difficulty breathing
  • Shock

The treatment options for burn injuries will vary depending on the severity of the burn. However, some common treatment options include:

  • First-degree burns: These burns typically heal on their own within a few days. However, it is important to keep the area clean and moist.
  • Second-degree burns: These burns may need to be treated with medication or surgery.
  • Third-degree burns: These burns typically require surgery and skin grafts.

.

Yes, you may be able to file a lawsuit if your burn injury was caused by the negligence or recklessness of another person or party. A burn injury lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

All Attorney Services in Staunton

Areas of Practice in Staunton

Cycling Incidents

Specializing in legal services for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' lack of care or risky conditions.

Flame Injuries

Providing adept legal advice for people of serious burn injuries caused by incidents or carelessness.

Medical Carelessness

Extending dedicated legal representation for clients affected by hospital malpractice, including wrong treatment.

Goods Accountability

Handling cases involving defective products, providing expert legal services to victims affected by product malfunctions.

Elder Malpractice

Representing the rights of seniors who have been subjected to neglect in senior centers environments, ensuring restitution.

Stumble & Stumble Accidents

Expert in managing tumble accident cases, providing legal assistance to individuals seeking recovery for their injuries.

Birth Harms

Supplying legal guidance for kin affected by medical negligence resulting in infant injuries.

Auto Accidents

Incidents: Focused on aiding sufferers of car accidents receive reasonable settlement for wounds and destruction.

Scooter Crashes

Focused on providing legal assistance for bikers involved in bike accidents, ensuring rightful claims for harm.

Trucking Incident

Offering experienced legal assistance for individuals involved in big rig accidents, focusing on securing fair compensation for losses.

Worksite Collisions

Engaged in advocating for workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or irresponsibility.

Head Harms

Specializing in extending dedicated legal representation for clients suffering from cognitive injuries due to incidents.

K9 Assault Wounds

Adept at dealing with cases for persons who have suffered harms from K9 assaults or creature assaults.

Cross-walker Collisions

Focused on legal services for walkers involved in accidents, providing comprehensive support for recovering recovery.

Wrongful Death

Fighting for families affected by a wrongful death, supplying sensitive and adept legal support to ensure restitution.

Neural Damage

Specializing in supporting persons with spinal cord injuries, offering professional legal representation to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer