Personal Injury Attorney in Third Lake

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Personal Injury Attorney Chicago
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When contemplating legal representation for personal injury matters in Third Lake, it’s vital to seek out capable, knowledgeable lawyers who prioritize your best interests. Think Carlson Bier. This reputed Illinois-based law firm boasts a distinguished heritage of competent advocacy and fervent assiduousness on behalf of clients navigating the rocky terrain of personal injury cases. Our pool of expert attorneys is well-versed in this niche area with immense prowess gained from years devoted to these cases exclusively. At Carlson Bier, we discernibly understand that every client’s situation poses unique circumstances thus demanding personalized services delivered impatiently tailored value-centric solutions significantly enhancing chances for success in each case dispute resolution pertaining to personal injuries due attributable thereto throughout the entire state including Third lake environs notwithstanding our physical address location within Illinois territory boundaries domain extant! Trust us implicitly at Carlson Bier where experience meets dedication rendering quality service ensues unswervingly right here and now ambitiously pioneering ahead unwaveringly focused indeed!

About Carlson Bier

Personal Injury Lawyers in Third Lake Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we are more than just a law firm – we are advocates for those affected by unfortunate personal injury events in the state of Illinois. Our vast experience and extensive knowledge make us adept at navigating the complex channels of personal injury law. The services we provide are not just about offering representation; it’s about understanding your struggle, providing emotional support, and building a strategic case model to ensure maximum benefits.

Personal injury is an umbrella term that covers diverse scenarios where individuals suffer harm due to the negligence or deliberate actions of others. Whether you have been injured in an automobile accident or medical malpractice incident, our legal team at Carlson Bier has the acumen to pursue justice on your behalf.

• Quality Representation: We’ve carved out a niche for ourselves through reliable advocacy anchored in legal prowess and ethical standards.

• Hands-on Case Handling: Every client gets undivided attention from our seasoned attorneys who will proactively handle every aspect of their case.

• Vast Experience: Over time, we’ve amassed wealth of experience representing injured victims across various spectrums of personal injury law.

Basically, if someone else’s action or failure to act has caused harm to you – physically or emotionally – that constitutes “personal injury”. A crucial aspect to consider in cases related to personal injury is negligence. For legal purposes, negligence denotes carelessness or irresponsibility that leads to damage or harm. If one can prove that “duty of care” was breached resulting in injuries, this forms the bedrock of a compelling lawsuit.

Injuries might be instantly noticeable viz-a-viz scars from car accidents but they could also be profound ones like spinal cord damages which may take time before revealing full magnitude. More subtle if highly deleterious forms include psychological traumas such as PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder) leading from severe accidents. Regardless of how apparent these injuries might seem initially or late manifestation thereof–as seasoned lawyers practicing personal injury law, we pledge unstinted effort to drive the best recourse-solution intercepting your circumstances.

A personal injury can drastically change a person’s life. Whether it is medical bills piling up, lost wages due to absence from work or continued pain and suffering — the effects can be financially devastating as well as emotionally draining. To offset these challenges, generally, three categories of damages – economic, non-economic and punitive – are sought in a lawsuit.

• Economic: These include all financial losses associated with an injury i.e., out-of-pocket expenses such as medical bills and loss of income.

• Non-Economic: They encompass intangible losses like emotional stress, pain & suffering.

• Punitive (if applicable): This is aimed to punish defendants for gross negligence or intentional misconduct.

Navigating the specifics alone can be daunting. Carlson Bier aims at shouldering this burden for you by meticulously crafting a robust litigation strategy keeping in view every element of evidence correlating to your personal injury case.

Before taking legal action pertaining to any circumstance where you feel you’ve been wronged leading to severe distress/injury, attaining clarity about your situation coupled with precise information about possible consequences is instrumental. Our “Case Worth” tool designed specifically for our clients helps provide answers that effectively adapt to their unique situations. You deserve nothing less than complete justice – visualizing what lies ahead can significantly alleviate anxiety triggering from uncertainties while firming-up faith in positive outcomes.

Let us accompany you on your journey towards rightful compensation befitting the severity of your predicament. We invite you take advantage of our experience and dedication which has enabled uplifting lives beyond mere monetary gains over years spanning proven successful representations. Click on the button below so we can help establish how much worth does your case potentially holds premised upon distinct attributes intrinsic thereto awaiting precise legal interpretation by competent professionals constituting Carlson Bier–rolling back difficulties imbalance caused creating avenues for comprehensive relief and assured progress.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Third Lake Residents

Links
Legal Blogs
All Attorney Services in Third Lake

Areas of Practice in Third Lake

Pedal Cycle Crashes

Dedicated to legal advocacy for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to negligent parties' carelessness or unsafe conditions.

Thermal Wounds

Providing specialist legal support for sufferers of grave burn injuries caused by accidents or misconduct.

Physician Negligence

Offering dedicated legal representation for patients affected by physician malpractice, including misdiagnosis.

Products Liability

Taking on cases involving dangerous products, providing expert legal assistance to consumers affected by defective items.

Senior Mistreatment

Supporting the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to misconduct in elderly care environments, ensuring compensation.

Stumble & Slip Accidents

Expert in handling trip accident cases, providing legal assistance to sufferers seeking justice for their suffering.

Neonatal Traumas

Providing legal aid for families affected by medical malpractice resulting in newborn injuries.

Vehicle Collisions

Collisions: Concentrated on guiding clients of car accidents receive appropriate compensation for harms and impairment.

Motorcycle Incidents

Committed to providing legal assistance for riders involved in motorbike accidents, ensuring justice for traumas.

Big Rig Crash

Offering specialist legal representation for victims involved in truck accidents, focusing on securing fair settlement for harms.

Building Site Mishaps

Focused on advocating for workmen or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to oversights or recklessness.

Neurological Traumas

Focused on delivering expert legal representation for patients suffering from neurological injuries due to accidents.

Canine Attack Injuries

Adept at managing cases for individuals who have suffered injuries from puppy bites or animal attacks.

Jogger Incidents

Expert in legal advocacy for foot-travelers involved in accidents, providing dedicated assistance for recovering damages.

Wrongful Loss

Fighting for families affected by a wrongful death, supplying caring and skilled legal guidance to ensure compensation.

Backbone Harm

Committed to advocating for persons with backbone trauma, offering specialized legal services to secure justice.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer