FREE CASE CONSULTATION
312-622-2900
Facebook-f Linkedin Google Instagram

Construction Site Accident Attorney in Tinley Park

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Carlson Bier Reviews And Ratings 5 Stars Google Reviews - Best Personal Injury Law Firm In Chicago
Find Out if You Have a Case in 10 Seconds
Jeff Bier – Founding Partner At Carlson Bier Best Personal Injury Lawyer In Chicago
Carlson Bier - 14 W Superior St Ste. 1503, Chicago, Il 60654, United States

About Carlson Bier Associates

If you are in Tinley Park and have tragic experiences related to Construction Site Accidents, consider Carlson Bier, a renowned Illinois-based law firm specializing in personal injury cases. Our team deeply understands the laws pertaining to Construction Site Accidents and commits itself fully towards winning your case. At Carlson Bier, we fight for maximum compensation for victims of construction accidents on their journey towards recovery. With years of accrued experience handling similar cases, we proudly uphold impressive track records in obtaining significant settlements or verdicts on behalf of our clients. We not only empathize with the gravity of your situation but also dedicate ourselves to ensure justice is served. For a truly resilient partnership during such challenging times, direct your confidence toward us knowing that we are exceptionally skilled at navigating through intricate legal matters connected to Construction Site Accidents within the scope allowed under Illinois law legislation— reassuring all that honest practice remains as paramount importance to us as securing favorable outcomes for our clients.

Meet Our Attorneys
About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in Tinley Park Illinois

Law is a complex field, and it becomes more so when we speak about Personal Injuries, especially those that occur at Construction Sites. Here at Carlson Bier, a well-established and highly reputable law firm based in Illinois, our army of zealous personal injury attorneys have partnered with a multitude of victims who have suffered the unfortunate fate of construction site accidents to navigate their legal journeys to justice punctuated by fair compensation.

Construction Site Accidents can often lead to devastating consequences that range from incapacitating injuries to fatal outcomes. The nature of these incidents is diverse but invariably grim: falling from insecure heights or scaffolds; suffering nail gun injuries during carpentry operations; being struck by unstable cranes or machinery not correctly operated or maintained – resulting in catastrophic effects that echo far beyond immediate physical pain into extensive medical bills and subsequent financial instability.

As you negotiate your recovery process from such daunting adversities, pivotal information derived explicitly from the realm of law offers insight which could pave your path towards resolute justice:

• Legal Responsibility: Make note here – Contractors and property owners may hold partial liability for failing to ensure standard job-site safety measures, whereas manufacturers may also share responsibility through producing defective equipment.

• Comparative Negligence Rule: This rule allows injured parties – even if partially at fault for the accident – to recover damages relative to their degree of responsibility.

• Statute Limitations: There exists a strict timetable within which you must file your claim after an accident – typically two years on general personal injury grounds in Illinois.

Propelled significantly by engaging with capable legal counsel holding robust expertise in this sphere (like us!), anyone bewildered amidst the complexities of such cases can chart out effective strategies leveraging profound industry knowledge as reliable rudders steering away from tumultuous legal challenges.

In all instances surrounding Construction Site Accidents– regardless of whether they pertain to workers’ compensation claims or third-party lawsuits – lawyers navigating this terrain must principally evaluate evidence associated with the case. Our lawyers will work hard to understand your needs, conduct site inspections and go through accident reports, medical records and witness statements to build a formidable case that stands tall amidst a sea of opposing legal contentions.

Our team at Carlson Bier boasts an impressive roster of personal injury attorneys passionately committed to fighting for the comprehensive rights of their clients. Coupled with fierce determination and unyielding resilience, our advocates hold fast against big insurance companies often aimed at reducing potential settlements. We are here – standing alongside you in this trying episode – ready to fight tooth and nail towards tipping the scales of justice favorably.

We focus on representing you accurately – providing an air-tight legal strategy by analyzing every tiny detail regarding your predicament while shielding you from unnecessary hassles linked with intricate bureaucracy or manipulative tactics employed against you. While we ensure complete transparency in keeping you informed about every step along this journey, we also promise confidentiality upholding unmatched professional standards.

So why choose us? At Carlson Bier, it’s simple: Experience meets Excellence! Our wealth of experience converges seamlessly with a steadfast service culture characterized by empathy and efficacy; making each client feel valued is as key to us as securing their victory.

Does our pledge resonate with your needs? If so, no need to hesitate or ponder further because justice waits for no one. Instead, take the first step by finding out more about how much your case could potentially be worth using our online tool designed explicitly for helping individuals like yourself make informed decisions during these turbid times. Click on the button below now and remember – at Carlson Bier because we believe fervently that every individual deserves fair compensation following instances as severe as construction site accidents – Providing Peace through Justice isn’t just our tagline; It’s what drives us!

Find Out How Much Your Case is Worth
Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Tinley Park Residents

Links

Legal Associations and Lawyer Services

Online Legal Resources and Directories

Specialized Services and Educational Resources

Legal Blogs
SEE MORE

Frequently Asked Questions

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Tinley Park

Areas of Practice in Tinley Park

Bike Mishaps

Specializing in legal support for clients injured in bicycle accidents due to responsible parties' recklessness or unsafe conditions.

Fire Traumas

Offering specialist legal services for individuals of grave burn injuries caused by occurrences or misconduct.

Hospital Incompetence

Ensuring expert legal representation for patients affected by physician malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Goods Obligation

Managing cases involving defective products, offering skilled legal assistance to clients affected by faulty goods.

Geriatric Mistreatment

Advocating for the rights of aged individuals who have been subjected to misconduct in nursing homes environments, ensuring compensation.

Stumble and Slip Mishaps

Adept in addressing stumble accident cases, providing legal support to persons seeking redress for their harm.

Childbirth Damages

Providing legal aid for kin affected by medical negligence resulting in childbirth injuries.

Motor Accidents

Accidents: Devoted to supporting victims of car accidents gain equitable compensation for hurts and destruction.

Bike Incidents

Committed to providing legal advice for motorcyclists involved in two-wheeler accidents, ensuring justice for traumas.

18-Wheeler Crash

Providing adept legal assistance for drivers involved in semi accidents, focusing on securing just settlement for injuries.

Worksite Collisions

Concentrated on advocating for workers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to recklessness or negligence.

Head Damages

Dedicated to providing expert legal assistance for persons suffering from cognitive injuries due to incidents.

Canine Attack Injuries

Proficient in handling cases for people who have suffered harms from canine attacks or beast attacks.

Foot-traveler Accidents

Specializing in legal support for cross-walkers involved in accidents, providing expert advice for recovering damages.

Wrongful Loss

Fighting for families affected by a wrongful death, supplying understanding and professional legal assistance to ensure justice.

Spinal Cord Damage

Committed to representing individuals with spine impairments, offering professional legal services to secure recovery.

Instant Case Evaluation

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer

312-313-2440