Construction Site Accident Attorney in Vienna

Let Carlson Bier Fight For You

Over $50 Million in Recoveries

Jeff Bier – Personal Injury Lawyer At Carlson Bier Associates
Personal Injury Lawyer Orland Park Illinois | Carlson Bier Associates

About Carlson Bier Associates

When dealing with construction site accidents in Vienna, Carlson Bier is an unrivaled choice to represent your legal interests. Our personal injury lawyers possess deep knowledge of complex construction safety regulations and labor laws, enabling us to fervently combat for justice on behalf of injured workers. We are vigilant advocates who ceaselessly fight for maximum compensation against negligent parties. At Carlson Bier, we believe the course of life shouldn’t be altered due to a worksite accident caused by someone else’s negligence. Tackling these cases requires an expansive grasp over different fields including employment law, product liability, and wrongful death claims. Our attorneys offer more than just their expertise – they provide compassionate consultation prioritizing clients’ needs first – because getting you back on track is our primary goal post such catastrophic mishaps. Trust your case in the dexterous hands at Carlson Bier where we bring transparency, diligence and unwavering commitment towards securing your rightful compensation for unfortunate construction site accidents within Vienna’s environs.

About Carlson Bier

Construction Site Accident Lawyers in Vienna Illinois

At Carlson Bier, we specialize in offering comprehensive legal services for victims of construction site accidents. As an esteemed personal injury law firm based in Illinois, our primary goal is to ensure justice served for those injured due to negligence or unsanitary conditions on construction sites. Construction site accidents can often result in devastating injuries, some leading to life-long disabilities. Our dedicated team of attorneys at Carlson Bier has exceptional expertise in these injury cases and utilize the fullest extent of the law to attain fair compensation.

Accidents occurring at construction sites are commonly a result of poor safety measures and neglectful practices. Some common scenarios include:

• Falling debris or equipment

• Falls from scaffolding

• Electrocutions and burns

• Equipment malfunctions

• Trench Collapses

• Exposure to hazardous materials

Our skilled attorneys thoroughly investigate each case and establish liability by pinpointing the breach of duty that led to your severe injuries. Often times, multiple parties may be held liable – this could range from contractors, subcontractors, or even manufacturers supplying faulty gear. By systematically analyzing all aspects of your accident, we are determined to hold those responsible accountable.

Injuries stemming from these circumstances can vary drastically; ranging from minor cuts and bruises to fatal consequences like death. Accidents such as falls can cause head traumas leading potentially lifelong effects like chronic pain or cognitive impairment . It’s also not uncommon for survivors to face emotional distress following the trauma of an accident which becomes limiting enough thus inhibiting day-to-day lifestyle changes..

By capturing these complexities surrounding such incidents ,we strive fervently towards justifiable recovery procedures..This includes actively pursuing coverage for medical expenses (both present & future), loss of wages,& personal suffering damages..

Let’s explore ways through which settlement negotiations work & how they’re pivotal elements within successful resolutions:

1.Presently ,our specialized lawyers analyze several factors before actual estimations begin:

2.)Medical-related costs (these include current bills, estimated future expenses and costs related to rehabilitation or therapy)

3.)Loss of income following an accident

4.)Diminished lifetime earning capacity (in case injuries have long-term impacts on your ability to work & earn)

5.)Pain & emotional suffering

Negotiating a fair settlement requires sharp analytical skills coupled with strong point of argument laws, which is exactly what our team offers. Our attorneys thoroughly understand every facet of personal injury law, specifically in relation to construction site accidents, & tirelessly exert themselves to ensure you receive the compensation deserved.

Choosing Carlson Bier means opting for fierce advocacy and proficient justice-support in difficult times. Remember; selecting the right legal representation can drastically influence overall case results which affects not only monetary aspects but also psychological relief ensuring a properly handled matter.

In Illinois, understanding who’s responsible could be more complex compared with other states.Due to state legislature stating comparative negligence ,I.e parties involved share equal fault figure.So in such cases if victim is found 25% liable for their accidents then they’re allowed to recover only 75% damages.(This percentage value is determined by court) However obtaining full recovery becomes even harder when trying proving less percent self-fault.This another important reason why having qualified representation counts during tricky negotiations between different parties involved .

Take that hassle-free step towards justice today – rely on expertise & experience underpinning each successful case at Carlson Bier. Click the button below to find out accurately how much you may rightfully claim back after sustaining these unforeseen adversities.It’s not just about receiving fair entitlement – it’s about re-establishing stability by providing deserving closure after experiencing such tragic events.At Carlson Bier , we strive harder towards achieving maximum client satisfaction within our permissible boundaries while ensuring every dollar counts.

Testimonials from Clients

Your Success Is Our Success

Notable Illinois Appellate Wins

Moruzzi v. CCC Servs., Inc., 2020 IL App (2d) 190411, 171 N.E.3d 61
Background: Insured motorist filed action against insurer for declaratory judgment seeking construction of automobile insurance policy issued to insured and that was in effect when insured was injured by an underinsured driver. The Circuit Court, DuPage County, Bonnie M. Wheaton, J., granted the insurer's motions for summary judgment. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Zenoff, J., held that:1 medical payments reduction clause in automobile insurance policy conflicted with underinsured motorist provisions so as to render reduction clause ambiguous, and thus medical payment benefits were deductible from insured's damages;2 law firm representing insured did not create common fund or common funds when it reached settlement with underinsured motorist, and thus law firm was not entitled to recover fees under common-fund doctrine; and3 collateral estoppel did not bar automobile insurers from litigating whether common-fund doctrine applied in insured motorist's declaratory judgment action.Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Maier v. CC Servs., Inc., 2019 IL App (3d) 170640, 132 N.E.3d 795
Background: After insured, who was injured in automobile collision with another driver, recovered full liability limits of driver's policy, she filed amended complaint for declaratory judgment against her own automobile insurer, alleging that insurer breached contractual duty to pay for insured's damages in accordance with uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage in insured's policy and that insurer acted in bad faith in denying insured such coverage. The Circuit Court, La Salle County, Troy D. Holland, J., granted the insurer's motion to dismiss claims as time-barred. Insured appealed.The Appellate Court ruled that neither the insurer nor the insured could add amended policy provisions to the court record. It was decided that the policy's requirement for a written arbitration demand applied to both uninsured and underinsured motorist claims. The court found that a letter from the insured's attorney to the insurer wasn't a valid arbitration demand nor a proof of loss to toll the statute of limitations. Finally, the insurer was permitted to use the defense based on the two-year statute of limitations period. The court's decision was affirmed.
Econ. Premier Assurance Co. v. Country Mut. Ins. Co., 2021 IL App (1st) 192364-U
Holding: The circuit court's order that granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment was proper where defendant had no duty to indemnify its insured with respect to the underlying complaint and therefore plaintiff was not entitled to recover against defendant on its subrogation or unjust enrichment claims; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Westerheide, 2023 IL App (5th) 220343-U
Holding: The court affirmed judgment of the circuit court granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff where the defendant failed to make a written demand for arbitration within two years from the date of the accident as required by the underinsured provisions of the defendant's automotive insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Olsak, 2022 IL App (1st) 200695, 216 N.E.3d 291
In a complex legal case, an insurer sought to avoid defending or indemnifying a hockey player under a policy issued to the player's stepfather after the player was sued for assaulting his coach. The initial Circuit Court ruling favored the insurer, but the Appellate Court reversed this decision, leading to a protracted legal battle. Ultimately, the Appellate Court determined the insurer was liable only up to the $3 million policy limit and found the insurer's four-year delay in seeking a declaratory judgment to be reasonable. This case highlights important aspects of insurance litigation and policy limit liabilities.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Durkin Elec. Co., Inc., 2022 IL App (1st) 210293-U, appeal denied, 199 N.E.3d 1187 (Ill. 2022)
Holding: The circuit court's order that denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and found that defendant was an additional insured under the policy was proper. The circuit court's order that denied defendant's motion for summary judgment and found that plaintiff did not have a duty to defend or indemnify defendant under the policy was proper; affirmed.
Country Preferred Ins. Co. v. Groen, 2017 IL App (4th) 160028, 69 N.E.3d 911
Background: Uninsured motorist (UM) carrier brought action against insured for declaratory judgment that it owed no benefits since workers' compensation received by insured exceeded policy limits. The Circuit Court, Sangamon County, Chris Perrin, J., entered summary judgment in favor of the carrier. Insured appealed.Holdings: The Appellate Court, Harris, J., held that:1 employer's medical payments entitled carrier to setoff, and2 setoff clauses were enforceable.Affirmed.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Frobish, 2021 IL App (3d) 190473-U
Holding: Allegations in the underlying complaint that a township employee caused property damage by excavating and digging out a ditch failed to impose a duty to defend under township employee's individual farm insurance policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Jones, 2018 IL App (1st) 173154-U
Holding: The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed; plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its claim for a declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the underlying complaint because the loss claimed in the underlying complaint is subject to an exclusion. The court held that it would also enter judgment for plaintiff because the underlying complaint does not allege an “occurrence” causing bodily injury within the meaning of the policy.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schmitt, 2021 IL App (5th) 190173-U
Holding: The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment of the circuit court where plaintiff had no duty to defend its insured and thus was not stopped from raising policy defenses to coverage for the underlying tort action contained in the amended declaratory action.
Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine, Inc., 222 Ill. 2d 303, 856 N.E.2d 338 (2006) (the late Keith Carlson)
Liability insurer brought action against insureds for a declaratory judgment based on failure to provide timely notice of lawsuits against them. The Circuit Court, Cook County, Stephen A. Schiller, J., entered judgment for the insurer. Insureds appealed. The Appellate Court, Wolfson, J., 358 Ill.App.3d 880, 295 Ill.Dec. 665, 833 N.E.2d 871, affirmed. Leave to appeal was granted.Holdings: The Supreme Court, Garman, J., held that:1 if the insurer did not receive reasonable notice of an occurrence or a lawsuit, the policyholder may not recover under the policy, regardless of whether the lack of reasonable notice prejudiced the insurer, overruling Rice v. AAA Aerostar, Inc., 294 Ill.App.3d 801, 229 Ill.Dec. 20, 690 N.E.2d 1067, and Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Baur's Opera House, Inc., 296 Ill.App.3d 1011, 230 Ill.Dec. 624, 694 N.E.2d 593, and2 insured did not need to prove that it was prejudiced by delayed notice of lawsuits.Affirmed.
Education & Information

Resources For Vienna Residents

Links
Legal Blogs

Construction Site Accidents FAQ​

The most common causes of construction site accidents in Chicago include:

  • Falls: Falls from heights are the leading cause of fatalities on construction sites.
  • Struck-by accidents: Struck-by accidents occur when workers are hit by falling objects, moving vehicles, or other equipment.
  • Electrocutions: Electrocutions can occur when workers come into contact with live wires or electrical equipment.
  • Caught-in/between accidents: Caught-in/between accidents occur when workers are caught between two moving objects or between a moving object and a stationary object.
  • Overexertion injuries: Overexertion injuries can occur when workers lift heavy objects or perform repetitive tasks.

If you are injured in a construction site accident in Chicago, you should:

  • Seek medical attention immediately. Even if you don’t think you’re seriously injured, it’s important to get checked out by a doctor.
  • Report the accident to your supervisor and to OSHA. OSHA is the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and they are responsible for investigating workplace accidents.
  • Contact a construction site accident lawyer. A lawyer can help you understand your rights and options, and can represent you in court if necessary.

As a construction site accident victim in Chicago, you have the right to:

  • Seek compensation for your medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages.
  • File a lawsuit against the person or company responsible for your accident.
  • Have your case heard by a jury.

In a construction site accident lawsuit in Chicago, you may be able to recover the following types of damages:

  • Medical expenses: This includes the cost of ambulance rides, hospital stays, doctor’s appointments, and physical therapy.
  • Lost wages: This includes the wages you lost while you were unable to work because of your injuries.
  • Pain and suffering: This includes compensation for the physical and emotional pain you have endured as a result of your injuries.
  • Loss of enjoyment of life: This includes compensation for the activities you can no longer enjoy as a result of your injuries.
  • Property damage: This includes the cost of repairing or replacing your personal belongings that were damaged in the accident.
  • Punitive damages: These damages are awarded to punish the defendant for egregious or reckless conduct.

The statute of limitations for construction site accident lawsuits in Illinois is two years. This means that you have two years from the date of the accident to file a lawsuit.

All Attorney Services in Vienna

Areas of Practice in Vienna

Bicycle Accidents

Expert in legal representation for persons injured in bicycle accidents due to others's recklessness or risky conditions.

Thermal Traumas

Extending specialist legal assistance for people of serious burn injuries caused by incidents or negligence.

Medical Negligence

Extending expert legal representation for clients affected by hospital malpractice, including medication mistakes.

Merchandise Liability

Managing cases involving unsafe products, offering professional legal support to customers affected by faulty goods.

Geriatric Misconduct

Representing the rights of seniors who have been subjected to abuse in nursing homes environments, ensuring restitution.

Fall and Trip Injuries

Specialist in dealing with stumble accident cases, providing legal representation to victims seeking recovery for their harm.

Newborn Traumas

Providing legal support for loved ones affected by medical carelessness resulting in newborn injuries.

Motor Accidents

Accidents: Devoted to guiding individuals of car accidents receive reasonable compensation for hurts and impairment.

Bike Mishaps

Focused on providing legal support for riders involved in bike accidents, ensuring fair compensation for traumas.

Trucking Crash

Extending professional legal representation for persons involved in trucking accidents, focusing on securing adequate compensation for damages.

Construction Site Mishaps

Engaged in supporting laborers or bystanders injured in construction site accidents due to carelessness or misconduct.

Cerebral Impairments

Dedicated to ensuring dedicated legal services for patients suffering from neurological injuries due to carelessness.

Dog Attack Harms

Proficient in handling cases for victims who have suffered harms from K9 assaults or beast attacks.

Cross-walker Collisions

Specializing in legal services for pedestrians involved in accidents, providing effective representation for recovering claims.

Unjust Passing

Striving for relatives affected by a wrongful death, providing sensitive and experienced legal assistance to ensure redress.

Backbone Impairment

Committed to advocating for clients with vertebral damage, offering expert legal representation to secure redress.

Contact Us Today if you need a Person Injury Lawyer